if you impalm then pull your weapon out and its leaving a hole ? cool!
0
posted02/25/2004 10:47 AM (UTC)by
Avatar
deadlyfatality
Avatar
Member Since
10/21/2003 08:32 PM (UTC)
this is more realistic then let it impalm and stayed inpalmed
what doo you think?
Avatar
buterbals113085
02/23/2004 07:48 PM (UTC)
0
yeah i think it would be kool if you stab some one that it leaves a hole or some small open spot and then they bleed to death eventually but i think it would be better if you could stab them several times and then the cut gets wider and stuff
Avatar
XcarnageX
Avatar
About Me

I Have Become as the Wastelands of Unending Nothingness. Now Shall the Night Things Fill Me with their Whisperings, and the Shadows Reveal their Wisdom.

02/23/2004 08:09 PM (UTC)
0
First of all, it's not impalm, it's impale.

Anyway, it would probably be more realistic, but that's not the point of the impale. It's a sacrifice; you lose your weapon, but the opponent loses health. Otherwise it would be horribly abused.
Avatar
Legacy
02/23/2004 09:04 PM (UTC)
0
I think I'd be cool if you could chop of body parts, but you'd have to do a long button combination to do so.
Avatar
salbeinit
02/23/2004 11:10 PM (UTC)
0

Legacy Wrote:
I think I'd be cool if you could chop of body parts, but you'd have to do a long button combination to do so.


play TIME KILLERS, and after that think if u really want that.
I Think MK6 Will Have All The Flaws Fixed Like The Whole Impale And It Has A Whole And With Kano's Fatality.....Cool But Looked Shitty
Avatar
OutworldDemon
Avatar
About Me

C:Documents and SettingsOwnerMy DocumentsMy Pictures2002-06-30sm-7s-sig025.gif

02/25/2004 04:48 AM (UTC)
0

xcarnagex Wrote:
First of all, it's not impalm, it's impale.

Anyway, it would probably be more realistic, but that's not the point of the impale. It's a sacrifice; you lose your weapon, but the opponent loses health. Otherwise it would be horribly abused.


agreeing wif carnage. It would be way too gay if u could just keep stabbing yer victim and leaving holes so he has no chance. The weapon is meant to be sacrificed look at kitana if u miss with hers u lose yer weapon. Tell if i'm wrong cuz i'm pretty sure thats whut happenned wif kitana's weapons in DA
Avatar
tgrant
Avatar
About Me
Project MKK: Coming soon...

Currently working on: MKD & MKA - The One Ring Theory
02/25/2004 10:47 AM (UTC)
0

xcarnagex Wrote:
First of all, it's not impalm, it's impale.

Anyway, it would probably be more realistic, but that's not the point of the impale. It's a sacrifice; you lose your weapon, but the opponent loses health. Otherwise it would be horribly abused.


I agree. It would be horribly abused! Although I didn't like how th opponent fought on with the weapon impaled inside them. Maybe they could take the weapon out and break it. Then the weapon is still sacrificed and we have a bit of realism.
Pages: 1
Discord
Twitch
Twitter
YouTube
Facebook
Privacy Policy
© 1998-2025 Shadow Knight Media, LLC. All rights reserved. Mortal Kombat, the dragon logo and all character names are trademarks and copyright of Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.