This is friggin disgusting, Playboy did this for publicity so that horny fanboys will buy it.

this has been posted before.. but is it out yet?

Cool, I wonder if they will do the other female characters

Kai, thats my favorite line from that movie, lol
Anyway, I hope they dont have full frontal nudity for the sake of mankind. Its a giant step closer to those sci-fi movies that take place in the future where they have whore houses with virtual goggles(virtal whores/sex) and no actual ppl in their. I want real whores dammit!

Let me know if any of you buy it. I'm compiling a list of why humanity should become extinct and that would really help my cause.

thats just perverted...but thats society for ya
but atleast shes not showing it all off like a hoe

You'd think that they would've picked a girl with a nicer smile.

lmao.....sad. I hope that issue runs the magazine into the ground

I heard about this, it's so damn pathetic and really just another low for men's standards. How does Heff go to sleep knowing guys are going to spank the monkey to pixelated girls in his magazine?
btw, what the hell is this doing in the Deception forum? Shouldn't this be in General Discussion

Hah? Now they call it sad and low while earlier they made 'sexiest women" threads =p. How logical

WTF turns a person on from a freakin made up 3-D non realistic thing??? wow

azazis Wrote: Hah? Now they call it sad and low while earlier they made 'sexiest women" threads =p. How logical

Who exactly is "they" ?? If you've actually ever read my opinion in any of those threads you'd see that I thought it was rather humorous and pathetic that guys would drool over pixelated girls. I haven't really gotten into the Deception boards in quite a while. Get your damn stories straight before you try acting like a smart ass when you clearly are a dumbass

Well, I have a subscription, so am I contributing to the downfall of the human race? I really don't see what's so disgusting about this. It's edgy, it's art. That's Playboy in a nutshell, edgy art. Here's a newsflash: not everyone who buys Playboy buys it to jerk off. Newsflash #2: You have to be 18 to buy Playboy and when you're 18 you can buy porn of real women too. Just because someone has a fetish doesn't mean they're a loser or a reason for killing the human race. Perhaps you should have a little more respect for what others do in their personal lives. I'm sure you wouldn't want someone demonizing your fetish whatever it may be. We all have our own way to get freaky, it ain't cool to shit on someone else's way.

Bezou Wrote: Let me know if any of you buy it. I'm compiling a list of why humanity should become extinct and that would really help my cause.

Scarecrow Wrote: Here's a newsflash: not everyone who buys Playboy buys it to jerk off.

I suppose you're correct, they buy them for the great articles right?

Many men are turned on by some anime and video game characters, believe it or not.
It's like some kind of fetish for them.
I just hope they don't show Mileena (the bitch) without her mask and show her jacked up grill (mouth) LOL.
I would've opted for Kitana, but I understand that they chose Mileena because she seems to play a key role in this game.

Scans?

PaulLondon Wrote: Scans?

Not allowed on the boards, read the rules

manny86 Wrote: I suppose you're correct, they buy them for the great articles right?

I assume you're being a smartass, and if you are, have you ever actually read a Playboy? Tell me what magazine you're going to open up and find in-depth articles on sports, an open forum for amazing editorials, exclusive sit-down interviews that actually ask hard questions with notoriously evasive celebrities such as Kiefer Sutherland and Johnny Depp, as well as major figures like Matt Damon and OJ Simpson, and great short-stories written by many great authors including Stephen King? So yes, many people DO read it for the great articles and the fact that there's nude women posing (tastefully I might add) is a bonus.
And shouldn't this be in the General Discussion forum?

Scarecrow Wrote: manny86 Wrote: I suppose you're correct, they buy them for the great articles right? I assume you're being a smartass, and if you are, have you ever actually read a Playboy? Tell me what magazine you're going to open up and find in-depth articles on sports, an open forum for amazing editorials, exclusive sit-down interviews that actually ask hard questions with notoriously evasive celebrities such as Kiefer Sutherland and Johnny Depp, as well as major figures like Matt Damon and OJ Simpson, and great short-stories written by many great authors including Stephen King? So yes, many people DO read it for the great articles and the fact that there's nude women posing (tastefully I might add) is a bonus. And shouldn't this be in the General Discussion forum?

Just so you know, yes I was being a smart ass. Sure the articles may be great, but common sense tells you majority of the people who buy these magazines buy them for one thing. That one thing isn't just a bonus for some of these people, it is the reason they're buying these magazines, the bonus for most of these people is the articles. I'm not trying to put you down or say my point is more valid than yours. In no way do I think I'm better than you or vice versca. I'm just saying Playboy has and always will be about beautiful women displayed nude in a magazine, then come the articles. You may disagree with this, but this is my opinion and just like anyone else would, i'm sticking to it. Peace.

Scarecrow Wrote: Well, I have a subscription, so am I contributing to the downfall of the human race? I really don't see what's so disgusting about this. It's edgy, it's art. That's Playboy in a nutshell, edgy art. Here's a newsflash: not everyone who buys Playboy buys it to jerk off. Newsflash #2: You have to be 18 to buy Playboy and when you're 18 you can buy porn of real women too. Just because someone has a fetish doesn't mean they're a loser or a reason for killing the human race. Perhaps you should have a little more respect for what others do in their personal lives. I'm sure you wouldn't want someone demonizing your fetish whatever it may be. We all have our own way to get freaky, it ain't cool to shit on someone else's way. Bezou Wrote: Let me know if any of you buy it. I'm compiling a list of why humanity should become extinct and that would really help my cause.

Well, I'm not 18 and I manage to buy Playboy !
I'm just so big for my age...
Anyway, one would have to be blind not to notice all the articles and interviews. It's much more than jut filler material.
And this belongs in the General Discussion.

If someone wanted a stroke mag, they'd pick up something that shows a hell of a lot more than Playboy. In Playboy, you get two, MAYBE three pictorials showing breasts, ass, and you'll catch a SMALL glimpse of a vagina. If they wanted a magazine strictly for stroking it, they'd go buy a Hustler which is filled with hardcore porn from cover to cover. You can buy a Playboy in your damn grocery store, it's tame. Sure, if you're a 10 year old kid, finding a Playboy is like a gold mine. But for mature adults, Playboy is a classy magazine that happens to feature nude models. Seriously, get a subscription and you'll find yourself reading the articles more than looking at the naked women. When I want something to stroke it to, I go to the Hustler Store.

manny86 Wrote: Scarecrow Wrote: manny86 Wrote: I suppose you're correct, they buy them for the great articles right? I assume you're being a smartass, and if you are, have you ever actually read a Playboy? Tell me what magazine you're going to open up and find in-depth articles on sports, an open forum for amazing editorials, exclusive sit-down interviews that actually ask hard questions with notoriously evasive celebrities such as Kiefer Sutherland and Johnny Depp, as well as major figures like Matt Damon and OJ Simpson, and great short-stories written by many great authors including Stephen King? So yes, many people DO read it for the great articles and the fact that there's nude women posing (tastefully I might add) is a bonus. And shouldn't this be in the General Discussion forum? Just so you know, yes I was being a smart ass. Sure the articles may be great, but common sense tells you majority of the people who buy these magazines buy them for one thing. That one thing isn't just a bonus for some of these people, it is the reason they're buying these magazines, the bonus for most of these people is the articles. I'm not trying to put you down or say my point is more valid than yours. In no way do I think I'm better than you or vice versca. I'm just saying Playboy has and always will be about beautiful women displayed nude in a magazine, then come the articles. You may disagree with this, but this is my opinion and just like anyone else would, i'm sticking to it. Peace.

Scarecrow Wrote: If someone wanted a stroke mag, they'd pick up something that shows a hell of a lot more than Playboy. In Playboy, you get two, MAYBE three pictorials showing breasts, ass, and you'll catch a SMALL glimpse of a vagina. If they wanted a magazine strictly for stroking it, they'd go buy a Hustler which is filled with hardcore porn from cover to cover. You can buy a Playboy in your damn grocery store, it's tame. Sure, if you're a 10 year old kid, finding a Playboy is like a gold mine. But for mature adults, Playboy is a classy magazine that happens to feature nude models. Seriously, get a subscription and you'll find yourself reading the articles more than looking at the naked women. When I want something to stroke it to, I go to the Hustler Store.

Regardless of what other magazines you could choose to buy, the fact is the magazine is adult oriented. Sure there's hustler, club, etc.... my point is, playboy's foundation wasn't build on the articles. That's not an opinion that's a fact. Overtime the articles became a big factor in the sales, but that's not the whole case.
The real reason I even posted here was because I found that having nude pics of rendered pixelated girls is rather low and not "classy" You do your thing, I do mine. I prefer to be social meet real women, and make friends. If other people prefer to buy these magazines, read the articles, and whatever else they do, that's their choice. I'm not judging you, everyone has their own likes and dislikes, this just happens to be one of MY dislikes and my opinion on it.

I'm terribly sorry, but I do not understand how a discussion like this is in the "MK: Deception" forum. It would belong in the "General Discussion" forum...

Scorpion_Ninja987 Wrote: I'm terribly sorry, but I do not understand how a discussion like this is in the "MK: Deception" forum. It would belong in the "General Discussion" forum...

Scorpion Ninja, I established this along with a link awhile back, aswell as another person and yourself, so why continue repeating that this is the wrong place for this thread? It really doesn't contribute at all now does it?