kenshi105 Wrote:
i just don't see how there is over 50 characters and u only need to unlock 4.
its like they just got lazy and didn't care that all the old boss characters that completly destroy everyone else were able to be used once you get the game. and why daegon and taven?they werent that good.i think all the characters in the bottom row should be locked. i also think all the other boss and sub-boss characters from this game and all the others should be locked. whoever agrees and or disagrees go ahead and reply.
...Wow
First of all, too many characters to have majority of them unlocked. It wouldn't be fun if somehow a lot of characters were all locked and that you HAD to play Konquest mode just to unlock them all. They did a fine job keeping Taven and Daegon from being playable. Because, they were the only new characters added to this game. Why shouldn't they be locked?
Why shouldn't we be able to play as the bosses? That would be stupid to have another Trilogy game having every character in MK playable with the exception of bosses. Yeah, they're cheap to play as, but they're still playable.
I thought Taven was a good character, despite that I never really played as Daegon, but I'm sure he's as good as Taven.
No, I don't think the "last" row should be locked, that would be lame to have just the bosses to be locked. And all the others? Who's that? The rest of the roaster not including the bosses? So, you're saying that, with the bosses locked, and all the others, you're basically saying that you want every other character in the game to be locked.
Unlocking characters is stupid, imo, and for such a game like Armageddon to have too many unlockable characters would have made matters even worse. So yeah, that's my point on this.
