It occured to me a while ago, with both parties loving to act as if they're completely different, than you can get both parties to want the same thing, so long as you use different words that are more specific to each of them.

Basically, my point is, that to sell an idea to liberals, you just have to convince it's good for the environment, or that it contribues to civil rights, , or that it's practical, something like that. But to sell it to conservatives, you'd have to convince them that it's badass, and manly.

One thing Yahoo's been talking about a lot lately are micro-houses. They don't hesitate to bring up the environmental benefits of those little boxes. And of course, you get the cons' freedom fighters schtick, as can be expected when they're not in power, more babbling about socialism, and how libs want to stick us in boxes, yada yada. Many libs seem to love micro-houses, because they're apparently good for the environment, and practical, and so on.

But if we get a republican in the white house in 2016, these same cons complaining about micro-houses will probably love them out of a sudden, no doubt because said houses will now be marketed as a real man's home, because real men don't need much, you see. Libs on the other hands, will now complain about inhumane conditions, and cons will be happy to call them wusses, spoiled brats, faggots and so on.

So, am I right? Can you sell almost anything to partisan hacks of both parties, so long as you use the right words, the right slogans? Red beds for cons, blue beds for libs, etc?