First off, I'd like to say that you can't define humanity.

It's one of those things that seems like such an incredibly simple task that absolutely no person is able to do it.

I suppose that we could always return to the barest of infallible principles: humanity is simply the act of being alive and a member of the
race Homo sapiens. The art of thought and reason comes into play nowhere here, and it is for this fact and this fact only that this is the only way
to define humanity--because after this point, no two members of our infamous race are alike.

Now, there are majorities and there are those with power who shape these majorities but there are not true principles that can be applied to owning a working human brain. Because we are the only known race capable of defining truth, we have no means to define it except for in comparison with other definitions of it, nullifying the concept completely. If there
is no truth, there can be no justice, there can be no certainty, there can be no order, because without the simple thing of truth it is mpossible to get an actual point across.

Without certainty or truth we cannot have communication because everything a person could say is entirely incorrect due to the fact that there is no one overbearingly intelligent enough to verify it.

Of course as with every principle it can just as easily be reversed to prove the exact opposite: if it is wholly impossible to be correct, then
it is equally impossible to be incorrect.

This is why every human is infinitely powerful because he or she has the unalienable and undenyable ability to force himself or herself upon another since there is no person truly qualified to prove him or her wrong, but cripplingly powerless because they themselves don't have the ability to prove themselves correct, and ultimately, that they really
exist at all.

Of course, as with all things, global society has moved completely away from such undeniable principles. This would be obvious and canon if we
were not indeed physical beings, bound by animalistic instinct and incapable, try as we may, to understand the ultimate laws of the universe. In essence we are not creatures of mind but creatures of instinct, which, ironically, brings us right back to where we started: that humans are but members of the race Homo sapiens, and therefore only able to be defined as animals and nothing else, ergo we are completely contradictory to the laws of the universe.

This is because the universe can only truly be examined when one is not a part of it. When you equate the self into understanding the philosophical and phisiological theorems of existence itself, we are always distracted by our individual need. We constantly attempt to apply the rules of obilivion to ourselves, which is just plain silly because we aren’t the center and the chief working part of this universe, but merely an anomaly, a malfunction that simply does not equate.

Heh...go figure.