First off i like to say that sure everyone can have their own opinion on a game or anything for that matter.But lets be real here,egm cant review games for some reason.If you really read their reviews,you would noticed its not a review but more of a rant.They dont really ever go into a game or if they give it a low score they give a half half-assed review if you even want to call ita review.I will admit I like their previews of games and they get them alot before others.But I think if you have the internet you can just look at in online months before egm prints it in their mag.I think they need to grow up alittle bit and be more muture about how they react to fans or anyone who sadly reads their mag.I know they been doing this for awhile now but this is seriously b-s cause before and by before i mean years ago there was actually some good ppl at egm that gave real reviews.But if you want to know what got me all mad was their review of the new T3 game.One of them gave it a 2.5.I will admit somethings on there are annoying in the game but the graphics in general makes it atleast 7.0.I know that shouldnt make a good game and it doesnt but it is a really good game to play.And if you read the review???with the 2.5 its really has nothing to do with the game.I also believe if some reviewer has something personal agaist someone or something with the game then they shouldnt review the game.Like if someone liked street fighter more the mk you can understand where I am going with that one.

Sorry for this rant but I am sick of egm kissing japs asses and they seem to think that ppl in north america cant make a decent game.But that topic is entire different from this well kinda but I dont want to go into it right now.