How come Dragons do not play a big role in this game?
0
posted07/17/2008 07:58 PM (UTC)by
Avatar
Icebaby
Avatar
Member Since
05/27/2008 09:03 PM (UTC)
The only time I got to see Dragons actually getting involved with this game was the Konquest in Armageddon. That was the only time I got to see Dragons involved with this game. A long time ago, I thought I was going to see Dragons appear in this game, though the only time I did see a Dragon was the logo itself.

I'll never understand why Dragons may not play such a huge part in MK, even though I understand that it's not Medieval-ish (And even though this topic is coming up the day after I went to the Rennasance Fair) I would really like to see Dragons play a larger role in this game.

What about you guys? Do you feel that Dragons should play a larger part in the game, even though it's a little to late to ask for it seeing how the crossover game will be taking place. Should the next game feature Dragons?

Ps. I do love Dragons a lot, I love drawing them a whole lot, just to let you all know.
Avatar
The_Doctor
07/14/2008 05:08 PM (UTC)
0
Wasent Onaga a dragon? Any who i dont think they used the logo for as something to intend people to think this game is about dragons but who knows but the creaters.
Avatar
Nightcrow
07/14/2008 05:51 PM (UTC)
0
Well i guess it would feel ultra cheap to have dragons or dragon based characters to play a big role on a game whose logo is a Dragon.

I think they came up with that logo back in '92 to increase the sort of dark and serious, tough fealing around MK.

The dragon logo is much more recognizable and respectfull than any crazy letter font to a game title.
Avatar
Icebaby
07/14/2008 11:15 PM (UTC)
0
The_Doctor Wrote:
Wasent Onaga a dragon? Any who i dont think they used the logo for as something to intend people to think this game is about dragons but who knows but the creaters.


Yes, I know that Onaga is/was a dragon, but he's not the type of Dragon I was referring to.

As I'm not really talking too much about the logo, that's not my point at all. I'm strictly talking about having a Drargon somewhat in the game, not as a character to play as, but somewhat fitting in the storyline to a certain character.

Like, can there be a character that has to do something with a Dragon in a way? As a taimer? You can't ask for another character to morph into a Dragon because that is taken by Liu Kang... but still, can't they at least be featured in some sort of way possible?
Avatar
PapaRoachFan
07/15/2008 12:43 AM (UTC)
0
my guess is that the dragon is there because the game was originally going to be based off of enter the dragon.
Avatar
Icebaby
07/15/2008 01:49 AM (UTC)
0
*Slaps face* Apparently you guys are not getting what I'm trying to say. I'm waiting for one more comment to see if they actually understand what I mean by this.
Avatar
RazorsEdge701
07/15/2008 02:37 PM (UTC)
0
Dragons are nearly extinct in Outworld by the time of the games. Hence calling it the LAST great dragon egg in Deadly Alliance.
Avatar
WaveMotionFist9
07/15/2008 04:22 PM (UTC)
0
RazorsEdge701 Wrote:
Dragons are nearly extinct in Outworld by the time of the games. Hence calling it the LAST great dragon egg in Deadly Alliance.


yeah, thats pretty much it.
Avatar
PapaRoachFan
07/16/2008 03:16 AM (UTC)
0
*BONK

oh, your asking why dragons don't play a big role, not why its the logo!

to answer your question... I don't know.

Avatar
Ninja_Mime
07/17/2008 07:58 PM (UTC)
0
Actually, I kind of like that we don't have any dragons until MKDA. The buildup to the Dragon King was fantastic.
Pages: 1
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
© 1998-2024 Shadow Knight Media, LLC. All rights reserved. Read our Privacy Policy.
Mortal Kombat, the dragon logo and all character names are trademarks and copyright of Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.