OK So I have been thinking this for a wile. . .. Tell me if you guys have noted this as well.

MK: Deadly Alliance is like MK 1: They were new game play, One fatality, new story (or saga in the story) and kind of the team testing the waters.

MK: Deception is like MK2: They took every thing that was great about there predecessor’s and doubled it. Then added a bunch of stuff to make it better. And when people are asked what’s the best mortal Kombat they usually say MK2 or MK:D.

MK: Armageddon is like MK3: OK it’s a bit more like MK trilogy. . .But what I’m getting at is this. They Made more upgrades to the fighting system (MK3 was combos, MK:A was air combat) And even though they are not that bad of games, They seemed like a let down after the raging success of there predecessors.