Heh funny how people aren't replying to this thread.

Actually i was thinking the same thing after reading a thread at the top of the page titled "what was wrong with MK:DA".

It wasn't all bad, for example the character designs were pretty good for the most part - for example raiden, sub zero, shang tsung, kung lao and scorpion had good outfits, even though they were just revamped versions of old attires, they worked well as did many other characters.

The addition of Mavado (however ridiculous he may have seemed), Bo Rai Cho and one or two other new characters that were quite good and seemed to slot into the storyline well.

Aestheticly(sp?) the stages were not too bad as a whole...keep in mind im not talking about breakable objects, hazards, invisable walls or anything else that contributed to actual gameplay.

The menus were good, i thought...not that really counts for anything...but i still thought they were good.

I thought the krypt was a farily good idea (for those mystery whispers if not anything else).

I'm sure there's more than just the small stuff I've listed here, but It's been too long since i played the game to remember it.

(Btw, the styles - a lot of them weren't really all that accurate)

I like MK: DA. With that I can think of alot of things why I love this game. For example like the all the diff fighting styles. Like MK3-MKT it gave each character their own flavor instead of just having everyone with the same common moves like uppercuts and round houses. MK: DA gameplay to me is cool in a since each character's style has to be dealt with differantly, and to that is the fun/ challange of it. Also with MK: DA gameplay the fighting is much more in your face. You can't just use your special moves to cheaply win, so the major in your face fighting.

MK Deadly Alliance was pretty good. Good graphics, interesting story, and all those extras you get in the Krypt