Banned Members
3D Kombat Klassics
Pages: 1
Banned Members
0
posted12/29/2007 07:13 PM (UTC)byI'd like to bring something up and have it explained to the rest of the members by a mod (any).
For the past several months, the Xbox forum on MKO has consisted of little more than meaningless threads that all seem to result in centering around on member (MKF30). Little else is discussed here as most discussions take place at MKAC, where a vast majority of Xbox players reside.
Now, it was brought up by a mod (GhostDragon) on several occasions that it was undesired to have consistent arguments with MKF30. Specifically, between MKF30 and Pig. Neither one of those members would cease their arguing or expression of opinions/facts to and against one-another. In fact, nearly no members would adhere to this as it is virtually the only discussion in the MKO-Xbox forum.
Recently, Pig was banned from MKO, apparently for refusing to stop his argumentative posts towards MKF30. Now, my question is this...
If Pig was band for refusing to stop his arguments with MKF30; why was MKF30 not banned as well (I've seen him post here since then)? In a way, I can understand Pig's ban. He didn't listen to a mod. But his continued arguments could only persist if MKF30 argued back. Why, then, was only Pig banned? What was Pig doing that MKF30 did not?
I've already asked GhostDragon about this through a PM, but I still haven't gotten an answer. I think it's something that should be addressed to all members. Reason for the thread.
For the past several months, the Xbox forum on MKO has consisted of little more than meaningless threads that all seem to result in centering around on member (MKF30). Little else is discussed here as most discussions take place at MKAC, where a vast majority of Xbox players reside.
Now, it was brought up by a mod (GhostDragon) on several occasions that it was undesired to have consistent arguments with MKF30. Specifically, between MKF30 and Pig. Neither one of those members would cease their arguing or expression of opinions/facts to and against one-another. In fact, nearly no members would adhere to this as it is virtually the only discussion in the MKO-Xbox forum.
Recently, Pig was banned from MKO, apparently for refusing to stop his argumentative posts towards MKF30. Now, my question is this...
If Pig was band for refusing to stop his arguments with MKF30; why was MKF30 not banned as well (I've seen him post here since then)? In a way, I can understand Pig's ban. He didn't listen to a mod. But his continued arguments could only persist if MKF30 argued back. Why, then, was only Pig banned? What was Pig doing that MKF30 did not?
I've already asked GhostDragon about this through a PM, but I still haven't gotten an answer. I think it's something that should be addressed to all members. Reason for the thread.


0
0
ChaosTheory Wrote:
I'd like to bring something up and have it explained to the rest of the members by a mod (any).
For the past several months, the Xbox forum on MKO has consisted of little more than meaningless threads that all seem to result in centering around on member (MKF30). Little else is discussed here as most discussions take place at MKAC, where a vast majority of Xbox players reside.
Now, it was brought up by a mod (GhostDragon) on several occasions that it was undesired to have consistent arguments with MKF30. Specifically, between MKF30 and Pig. Neither one of those members would cease their arguing or expression of opinions/facts to and against one-another. In fact, nearly no members would adhere to this as it is virtually the only discussion in the MKO-Xbox forum.
Recently, Pig was banned from MKO, apparently for refusing to stop his argumentative posts towards MKF30. Now, my question is this...
If Pig was band for refusing to stop his arguments with MKF30; why was MKF30 not banned as well (I've seen him post here since then)? In a way, I can understand Pig's ban. He didn't listen to a mod. But his continued arguments could only persist if MKF30 argued back. Why, then, was only Pig banned? What was Pig doing that MKF30 did not?
I've already asked GhostDragon about this through a PM, but I still haven't gotten an answer. I think it's something that should be addressed to all members. Reason for the thread.
I'd like to bring something up and have it explained to the rest of the members by a mod (any).
For the past several months, the Xbox forum on MKO has consisted of little more than meaningless threads that all seem to result in centering around on member (MKF30). Little else is discussed here as most discussions take place at MKAC, where a vast majority of Xbox players reside.
Now, it was brought up by a mod (GhostDragon) on several occasions that it was undesired to have consistent arguments with MKF30. Specifically, between MKF30 and Pig. Neither one of those members would cease their arguing or expression of opinions/facts to and against one-another. In fact, nearly no members would adhere to this as it is virtually the only discussion in the MKO-Xbox forum.
Recently, Pig was banned from MKO, apparently for refusing to stop his argumentative posts towards MKF30. Now, my question is this...
If Pig was band for refusing to stop his arguments with MKF30; why was MKF30 not banned as well (I've seen him post here since then)? In a way, I can understand Pig's ban. He didn't listen to a mod. But his continued arguments could only persist if MKF30 argued back. Why, then, was only Pig banned? What was Pig doing that MKF30 did not?
I've already asked GhostDragon about this through a PM, but I still haven't gotten an answer. I think it's something that should be addressed to all members. Reason for the thread.
I can give you answer you can shoot me down if you think I'm wrong. It was probably because MKF bitched and cried to the mods about people commenting on his strange irrational posts and him referring to these resposes as flames when in reality they are just facts on the lame things he actually does but he doesn't want it brought to anyone's attention. I received a pm from GhostDragon as well warning me about arguing/flamming MKF. Well I think GhostDragon is actually one of the cooler mods but it seems if he's put under the pressure of this forum turning into a flame MKF site he'll do what he has to do.
About Me
Ghostdragon - Fan Submission Director ghostdragon@mortalkombatonline.com
Mortal Kombat Online - The Ultimate Mortal Kombat Experience
http://www.mortalkombatonline.com
-Isaac Watts
0
To be honest, I was already fed up w/ both of them, since I had been editing or deleting a good number of their posts in various threads after telling them and others in various posts ad nauseam to get back on topic.
I could care less if MKF spouts the wisdom of Lao Tze or not. Debating or challenging on what he says is fine, but purposeful attacking via flaming and ridicule (especially the use of that sig) as what's been exhibited is not. And to be fair, there have been times where MKF has invited trouble on himself with taking a few jabs at him, but we all know he wasn't the main instigator. And since Pig was, he was closer to the brink and he should have known that.
Now, in looking back through most of the otiose posts from the both of them (which was exhausting to read through) and thinking of when Pig's temp ban expires, I'm of the opinion (at this time) that I may need to watch this forum like a hawk (more so than now) when it does.
In the mean time, I'm just going to say that it can't get even close to bad as it has been here. Decent threads have been killed and there's no reason for some many threads to have been locked on account of the needless drama. So, for those who've been in on it all, MKF included, do not let whatever debates or civil arguments go so far off that I have to issue a warning. It'll be the only one you'll receive.
Now, I'd prefer that any further comments, questions, money that needs to be laundered through off shore bank accounts, etc. for me be referred via PM or this thread if you must, though I really prefer PM. Reason being, a thread (stickied or not) concerning XBox gameplay or anything related should get more prominence.
Ghostdragon
I could care less if MKF spouts the wisdom of Lao Tze or not. Debating or challenging on what he says is fine, but purposeful attacking via flaming and ridicule (especially the use of that sig) as what's been exhibited is not. And to be fair, there have been times where MKF has invited trouble on himself with taking a few jabs at him, but we all know he wasn't the main instigator. And since Pig was, he was closer to the brink and he should have known that.
Now, in looking back through most of the otiose posts from the both of them (which was exhausting to read through) and thinking of when Pig's temp ban expires, I'm of the opinion (at this time) that I may need to watch this forum like a hawk (more so than now) when it does.
In the mean time, I'm just going to say that it can't get even close to bad as it has been here. Decent threads have been killed and there's no reason for some many threads to have been locked on account of the needless drama. So, for those who've been in on it all, MKF included, do not let whatever debates or civil arguments go so far off that I have to issue a warning. It'll be the only one you'll receive.
Now, I'd prefer that any further comments, questions, money that needs to be laundered through off shore bank accounts, etc. for me be referred via PM or this thread if you must, though I really prefer PM. Reason being, a thread (stickied or not) concerning XBox gameplay or anything related should get more prominence.
Ghostdragon
Pages: 1
© 1998-2025 Shadow Knight Media, LLC. All rights reserved. Mortal Kombat, the dragon logo and all character names are trademarks and copyright of Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.







