Deception in the bios!
Deception in the bios!
0
posted09/18/2004 02:19 PM (UTC)by
I have believed for a long time now that the bios we have received and read are not complete. Enemies for certain characters seem to be missing as well as friends and allies of some characters.
Some information in the bios also seems to be sketchy and incomplete. Ashrahs is a good example of this.
And, judging by how the bios are written, we may be being deceived by them. Take Tanyas for example. It speaks in the first person as if she is telling us her story. We know Tanya to be evil, deceptive, cunning, sly etc. Since the bio is written in the first person, what if she along with other characters are using their own words to deceive us into believing they're something they are not?
Tanyas bio makes her seem somewhat good and we know that isn't the case. The deception here is to make us feel that she might be trying to be good and then she will suddenly shock us later on. This will add to the deception feel and the drama of the story as it is like she has just lied to us directly.
What do you think?
And thanks to queve who suddenly triggered this thought in our latest convo.
Some information in the bios also seems to be sketchy and incomplete. Ashrahs is a good example of this.
And, judging by how the bios are written, we may be being deceived by them. Take Tanyas for example. It speaks in the first person as if she is telling us her story. We know Tanya to be evil, deceptive, cunning, sly etc. Since the bio is written in the first person, what if she along with other characters are using their own words to deceive us into believing they're something they are not?
Tanyas bio makes her seem somewhat good and we know that isn't the case. The deception here is to make us feel that she might be trying to be good and then she will suddenly shock us later on. This will add to the deception feel and the drama of the story as it is like she has just lied to us directly.
What do you think?
And thanks to queve who suddenly triggered this thought in our latest convo.
0
never thought of that, good thought. that would expain other things too.
P.S. Were is tanya's bio at?
P.S. Were is tanya's bio at?
| tgrant Wrote: Take Tanyas for example. It speaks in the first person as if she is telling us her story. We know Tanya to be evil, deceptive, cunning, sly etc. Since the bio is written in the first person, what if she along with other characters are using their own words to deceive us into believing they're something they are not? And thanks to queve who suddenly triggered this thought in our latest convo. |
LOL! Glad to be a source of "inspiration". LOL. Just kidding T.
This is indeed a very good observation!!! Highly possible.
I actually hope its true since I dislike Tanya's known Bio very much. Its so simple....so not her, she almost sounds like a good guy/girl!
This is a great observation T. Highly possible.
Good job!

0
| MrSilvers Wrote: never thought of that, good thought. that would expain other things too. P.S. Were is tanya's bio at? |
I believe it could explain other things. Tanyas bio is on the official MKD site.
Here it is:
Tanya
I had been called an enforcer of the Deadly Alliance. I preferred the term ambassador. It was my duty to impose the will of Quan Chi and Shang Tsung upon the denizens of Outworld. But the sorcerers rule was short-lived and I found myself leaderless, longing to return to my birthplace in Edenia. When Baraka caught up with me, he gave me a choice: Serve his new lord of Outwork or die. I have lived for thousands of years because I make the right decisions. I pledged my service to the Dragon King. Onaga was aware of Shao Kahns invasion of Edenia so many years ago. Apparently the Dragon King had been watching Shao Kahn from beyond death. Whatever the late emperor had been attempting, Onaga was determined to complete it. He was looking for lost information, ancient spells that would fuse the Elder Gods six Kamidogu into one and therefore make it possible for him to wield their combined might. I brought him to Edenia, where I believed that information still existed.
I think the Characters are telling their stories in first person to deceive people, and to make us fall into their stories and deceive us from their deception.
I think the bios may not be completed either, because not all of their 'friends' 'enemies' are complete, plus their bios are very brief. However I guess we have to make until MKD.
I think the bios may not be completed either, because not all of their 'friends' 'enemies' are complete, plus their bios are very brief. However I guess we have to make until MKD.

0
| queve Wrote: tgrant Wrote: Take Tanyas for example. It speaks in the first person as if she is telling us her story. We know Tanya to be evil, deceptive, cunning, sly etc. Since the bio is written in the first person, what if she along with other characters are using their own words to deceive us into believing they're something they are not? And thanks to queve who suddenly triggered this thought in our latest convo. LOL! Glad to be a source of "inspiration". LOL. Just kidding T. This is indeed a very good observation!!! Highly possible. I actually hope its true since I dislike Tanya's known Bio very much. Its so simple....so not her, she almost sounds like a good guy/girl! This is a great observation T. Highly possible. Good job! |
lol Thanks, man! I like Tanyas bio. Looking at it another way, she seems troubled.
Hopefully, this is true though. I would want Tanya to be at her evil best!
| Toxik Wrote: I think the Characters are telling their stories in first person to deceive people, and to make us fall into their stories and deceive us from their deception. I think the bios may not be completed either, because not all of their 'friends' 'enemies' are complete, plus their bios are very brief. However I guess we have to make until MKD. |
These are my beliefs too. The characters directly lying to us is a great way to write the bios imo. It would add more depth to the story and help draw us in some more and make us feel apart of the story.
I hope this is a definite possibility.

0
| DMitch Wrote: Why does everyone thinks that everything we get is made to deceive us. It's just a bio. The game being named Deception doesn't mean that everything is. |
And why must people like yourself bitch at every little attempt that any person does to put forward their views and theories? Believe what you will, but stop being so negative about people expressing their own views. Sorry to come across harshly there, but it is irritating.
| DMitch Wrote: Why does everyone thinks that everything we get is made to deceive us. It's just a bio. The game being named Deception doesn't mean that everything is. |
So your saying you believe a lier like Tanya just kidding.
tgrant and queve nice thinking, cause we never know if they are telling us the truth or not since some people are evil and just trying to deceive us or they are leaving some juicy stuff out that they dont want us to know.
I like these first person bios even if they are meant to deceive us or just are really telling us the truth.

0
| TheKrypt Wrote: DMitch Wrote: Why does everyone thinks that everything we get is made to deceive us. It's just a bio. The game being named Deception doesn't mean that everything is. So your saying you believe a lier like Tanya just kidding. tgrant and queve nice thinking, cause we never know if they are telling us the truth or not since some people are evil and just trying to deceive us or they are leaving some juicy stuff out that they dont want us to know. I like these first person bios even if they are meant to deceive us or just are really telling us the truth. |
Exactly. Someone like Tanya cannot be trusted fully based on what she says. We have seen how she acts and know what she is like, so why should we fully believe what she says?
We could never tell if she was being truthful or not.

0
I agree with you TGrant. Not in a bad way, MK Deception is the most unclear story so far. The bios for me are a bit confusing since why do some characters have allies that have been thought to be dead? Doesn't make since to me. As well as some of the characters like Noob Smoke and Radien. I have tons of questions, I fear I will spend most of my time in Konquest mode, instead of training -_- to uncover the MK: Deception.
i dont see how her bio makes her seem like a good gal
in mk4 she served shinnok and quan chi.during mkda she was serving the deadly alliance,now mk6 she's serving onaga.
her 1st task, was/is to over take the throne in edenia. which she did, if u read sindels and jades trading cards. she got the statue for the dragon king..
now what i am actually curious about, is how will mileena take the news of tanya having control of the throne and not her? if sindel and kitana end up dead after all of this drAgon king stuff.. tanya might still have control of the throne.. i see a jade/mileena/tanya fight over the throne in a future mk..
her 1st task, was/is to over take the throne in edenia. which she did, if u read sindels and jades trading cards. she got the statue for the dragon king..
now what i am actually curious about, is how will mileena take the news of tanya having control of the throne and not her? if sindel and kitana end up dead after all of this drAgon king stuff.. tanya might still have control of the throne.. i see a jade/mileena/tanya fight over the throne in a future mk..
| Frost4584 Wrote: I agree with you TGrant. Not in a bad way, MK Deception is the most unclear story so far. The bios for me are a bit confusing since why do some characters have allies that have been thought to be dead? Doesn't make since to me. As well as some of the characters like Noob Smoke and Radien. I have tons of questions, I fear I will spend most of my time in Konquest mode, instead of training -_- to uncover the MK: Deception. |
Agreed! Great post.
BTW, Tgrant, I so agree with your last posts.
About Me
0
It would be funny if she called herself a lying little bitch in her bio..but thats not likely and logical...so there's nothing deceiving in her bio at my opinion..but I could be wrong, although thats not likely either because im rarely wrong..

About Me

My MKO Pic
click it---> FFBF TOURNAMENT WEBSITE <---click it
0
damn it now i got to much thoughts in my head lol some good points in here....aaahhh i'm bleeding

| lifelesssquared Wrote: damn it now i got to much thoughts in my head lol some good points in here....aaahhh i'm bleeding |
Yeah I know, same here, there are many thoughts in my mind floating around concerning MK:D. I kinda get confused at times, then my brain has to reboot again. lol
0
that's gotta be some quantum physics man!!! best theory i've ever heard! don't i know u from trmk?
0
that would be very cool if we are trick and persuded by the character them selves.
this idea would be very cool in Konquest cause you get to meet the character face to face, and you get to choose if you want to believe them or not.
other then that i think its boon way of making us understand the character by having it written or said in there own words, so it is like we are being told a story.
this idea would be very cool in Konquest cause you get to meet the character face to face, and you get to choose if you want to believe them or not.
other then that i think its boon way of making us understand the character by having it written or said in there own words, so it is like we are being told a story.

0
Okay, do we even know what the actual "Deception" is? I have a feeling that it's just one worthwhile part in the plot and doesn't go as deep as every character trying to trick us through telling their story (though it is a good theory).
I like MK and the MK team, but I don't think they'd be as deep as you're suggesting. The First person view is most likely a minor (but welcome) twist on telling their bios.
I like MK and the MK team, but I don't think they'd be as deep as you're suggesting. The First person view is most likely a minor (but welcome) twist on telling their bios.
what im curious about that pertains to the Bios is if the ones posted at IGN are gonna be the same ones included with the Kollectors Edition. If so, im definitely not getting it, ill save the 10 bones for all the other games im copping this year.
I agree with you. It's not like Tanya came up to us and said "Hey, my name's Tanya. Let me explain my past." maybe it's what she's thinking, would she lie to herself? Maybe she never even really said it anyways, I'll go with that. Decieving bios would be so annoying, I sincerely hope that this is not the case.
| DMitch Wrote: Cuz it's a god damn bio, not a testimony. |
| MPKombat Wrote: what im curious about that pertains to the Bios is if the ones posted at IGN are gonna be the same ones included with the Kollectors Edition. If so, im definitely not getting it, ill save the 10 bones for all the other games im copping this year. |
teh trading kards only give part of the bio - the rest is mostly background info on the character.The real in game bios are like in DA - in 2 parts and therefore go into more detail.
Great theory,BTW,Tgrant!

0
| Frost4584 Wrote: I agree with you TGrant. Not in a bad way, MK Deception is the most unclear story so far. The bios for me are a bit confusing since why do some characters have allies that have been thought to be dead? Doesn't make since to me. As well as some of the characters like Noob Smoke and Radien. I have tons of questions, I fear I will spend most of my time in Konquest mode, instead of training -_- to uncover the MK: Deception. |
I know Ill be on Konquest a lot trying to piece together the story. MKd has set up a lot of interesting side stories along with the main story. I cant wait to find out everything.
| danadbab Wrote: i dont see how her bio makes her seem like a good gal in mk4 she served shinnok and quan chi.during mkda she was serving the deadly alliance,now mk6 she's serving onaga.. her 1st task, was/is to over take the throne in edenia. which she did, if u read sindels and jades trading cards. she got the statue for the dragon king.. now what i am actually curious about, is how will mileena take the news of tanya having control of the throne and not her? if sindel and kitana end up dead after all of this drAgon king stuff.. tanya might still have control of the throne.. i see a jade/mileena/tanya fight over the throne in a future mk.. |
She doesnt seem evil enough in her bio. Its almost as if she isnt doing anything for herself. I believe Tanya to be selfish and Deceptive, but all she wants here in her bio is to go home. It seems she only did all of what she did so she could go to Edenia.
However, what you say is true. Mileenas reaction wont be a pleasnt one. She and Tanya will most likely clash at some point.
| kitana_arsenal Wrote: It would be funny if she called herself a lying little bitch in her bio..but thats not likely and logical...so there's nothing deceiving in her bio at my opinion..but I could be wrong, although thats not likely either because im rarely wrong.. |
Lol That would be funny. She probably does. And maybe there is no deception in the bio, but its a possibility.
| lifelesssquared Wrote: damn it now i got to much thoughts in my head lol some good points in here....aaahhh i'm bleeding |
lol Youll be fine man.
| TheKrypt Wrote: lifelesssquared Wrote: damn it now i got to much thoughts in my head lol some good points in here....aaahhh i'm bleeding Yeah I know, same here, there are many thoughts in my mind floating around concerning MK:D. I kinda get confused at times, then my brain has to reboot again. lol |
Lol Same here. I love all the speculation though. It adds to the excitememnt.
| Boomstick Wrote: that's gotta be some quantum physics man!!! best theory i've ever heard! don't i know u from trmk? |
Wow! Thanks, dude!
© 1998-2025 Shadow Knight Media, LLC. All rights reserved. Mortal Kombat, the dragon logo and all character names are trademarks and copyright of Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.








