difference between armageddon and trilogy
0
posted06/25/2007 07:33 PM (UTC)by
Avatar
annilation
Avatar
About Me

I feel so alone, gonna end up a Big ole pile of them bones.

Member Since
06/17/2007 06:48 PM (UTC)
trilogy had all types of fatalities except for babyality armageddon has only a kreate-a-fatality it would be better off with all types of fatalitiesconfused
Avatar
mepeople
06/20/2007 04:58 PM (UTC)
0
It would be better if it didnt have KAF period. even if they only had 2 fatality each it would have been better.
Avatar
LitoJ
06/20/2007 05:33 PM (UTC)
0
Maybe it would of been good if all characters had 2 Fatalities and all of them had KAF as well?

KAF for the newcomers to MK and old fashioned fatalities for the rest of us?
Avatar
PumkinKing93
06/20/2007 09:33 PM (UTC)
0
how bout they took the best 2 fatalities they ever had in mk according to our polls and then they just put em in the game
Avatar
TheSilverSurfer
06/20/2007 11:01 PM (UTC)
0
annilation Wrote:
trilogy had all types of fatalities except for babyality armageddon has only a kreate-a-fatality it would be better off with all types of fatalitiesconfused

This is why your sappose to own both to satisfy different gameplay man. Trilogy, and Armageddon.
Avatar
lastfighter89
06/21/2007 07:33 PM (UTC)
0
trilogy was a comnplete game.
Armageddon is a half-assed one.
Avatar
filth
06/21/2007 07:56 PM (UTC)
0
PumkinKing93 Wrote:
how bout they took the best 2 fatalities they ever had in mk according to our polls and then they just put em in the game
i agree.
Avatar
Chrome
Avatar
About Me

06/21/2007 09:20 PM (UTC)
0
TRILOGY

Half-assed unfinished game with a very broken gameplay, shit character roster, and lame finishers. Broken programming too, loadtime troubles, freezes and generally buggy.

ARMAGEDDON
Half-assed unfinished game with mediocre gameplay (better than MKD, less than enough as MKDA), better roster and debatable finishers. MK Trilogy was the sinkhole of the MK series before MK4.
Avatar
.
06/22/2007 05:58 PM (UTC)
0
mepeople Wrote:
It would be better if it didnt have KAF period. even if they only had 2 fatality each it would have been better.


I agree!

I prefer the video fatalities (that's what they're called, right?), too.
Avatar
DarzieP
Avatar
About Me

OptimusGrime Wrote:Li Mei needs to be series mainstay. She betrayed goddamned planets because she wanted to fuck a dragon. Best character in anything ever.

06/22/2007 08:24 PM (UTC)
0
But the reason MK:A didn't have individual fatalities was because of the amount of characters. Somewhere in around 128 fatalities, there's gonna be repeats.
Avatar
TheIceCreamMan
06/22/2007 11:19 PM (UTC)
0
Better a few repeats than every character having the same generic moves.

I would be happy if every character had at least one fatality to call their own and KAF was for KAKs.
Avatar
genesim
06/24/2007 04:55 PM (UTC)
0
Yeah more like a hundred repeats in the current version.
Avatar
general_baraka14
06/24/2007 11:52 PM (UTC)
0
i like the idea of having every type of fatalities for each characters and hara kiris and if they had Kreate a fatality option aswell. That woulda been good
Avatar
queve
06/25/2007 07:33 PM (UTC)
0
Overall, MKT is a much better and complete game because we knew what we were getting and what to expect from it (no new storyline or endings, etc., just a better Mk3/MKU game).

MKA failed miserably. A very bad MK game, very bad.
Pages: 1
Discord
Twitch
Twitter
YouTube
Facebook
Privacy Policy
© 1998-2025 Shadow Knight Media, LLC. All rights reserved. Mortal Kombat, the dragon logo and all character names are trademarks and copyright of Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.