mkflegend Wrote:The_Truth Wrote:sektor_rulz Wrote:
I like the rating, not the review.
Bingo.
My opinion, they both suck royally.Rating and review.
It's like UltimateRyu said. there's an uncanny bias and anyone can see this(or perhaps not) but I sure do.
It's fine to not like MK:A, but 5 out of 10?Come on that's bs, and it's far from that bad even if you don't like it.Even all my friends that don't like MK say it's a good game just not for them.
Eh, whatever man.
I don't care for Armageddon. It did nothing for me and I really have no interest in playing a game where the priorities were in making shitty side games instead of putting in basic things like throw escapes (which were in apparently at one time but now aren't..?) and at least
somewhat logical frame data. Yeah it's more balanced than Deception, like that would be hard, but it's still not fun to play to me. I'm sick of canned combos, I'm sick of being at huge frame disadvantage after throwing a
jab, and I'm sick of every character not feeling different save for special moves. This also doesn't even cover how disgusted I was with the storyline among other things...
It deserved the 5/10 rating as far as I'm concerned, it did
not however need this reviewer's negativity talking about stuff that he obviously didn't even try out.
Whatever though if this game is good for you, fantastic. I couldn't be arsed to argue over Armageddon anymore, I just hope they do something good in the next one. u_u
98% of the Internet population has a Myspace. If you're part of the 2% that doesn't, copy and paste this into your sig.
, This guy is off his meds. & wtheck is Eurogamer!!!???
