tabmok Wrote: Which charectar is better.sub is a better at the actual kombat scorpion has cooler powers.and a cooler look.of course Sub-zero is truly the Hardest of the 2.

Both Sub-Zero & Scorpion are of equal fighting calibur and status, to exclude either of them in the next installment of Mortal Kombat would be an unforgivable crime.

As to your question of which is better, they are both equal in power I believe, just different kinds of power & skills and in the hands of a good player they are both equally as good!

This might be kinda hard to decide.Older Brother Sub-Zero (I don't know the number) killed Scorpion and two years later he came back as Scorpion and killed that Sub-Zero.The current Sub-Zero,I don't know how good he can fight against Scorpion.I'm saying Scorpion would beat him

would sub-zero beat scorpion without the dragon medalion is the question, other wise scorps would hapkida his ass all the way back to the north pole.no offence all does subzeros out there just kiddin.

Scorpion is better than the younger Subzero. With the Dragon Amulet the battle could go either way. As for the older brother, he is defintely better

Personally, I find this topic cheesy, old, and lame.

Zentile Wrote: Personally, I find this topic cheesy, old, and lame.

You're right!!!!

Baraka could hold his own against both these two

sub-zero, only reason is because i like frost so...

they both rock, Scorpion is fire, Sub-zero is ice. they both look extremely cool, they have bad ass combos, they are truly, in my opinion, the best character's in MKDA, (so is kung lao but thats not the point). How can you have Sub-Zero, with out scorpion, to get rid of one, is a BIG mistake for Ed Bonn and his team to do.