i dunno it fucking sucks

Perhaps the US shouldn't do anything. Other countries can handle this and they'll do a much better job than we could.

DrCube Wrote: Perhaps the US shouldn't do anything. Other countries can handle this and they'll do a much better job than we could.

Oh really? The U.N. doesn't exert much strength if any when situations like this pop up and the U.S. shows up only when it's too late.


GD

That sux!

I know what you're saying, but to some extend we're required to by signed argreements we have. Does that mean physical force? Not nessicarly. And also remember, sometimes we can lend troops, we don't need to be in charge(that is I guess, if I were running the U.S.)

What do you think the responsibility should be of rich countries?

DrCube Wrote: Perhaps the US shouldn't do anything. Other countries can handle this and they'll do a much better job than we could.

I'll go check another news site and give you an update
You have six threads on the front page, give it a rest.

OMG....the US has their hands full with the Middle East, now they want to mess around there? Isn't that a little too much?

born-again-vampire Wrote: I know what you're saying, but to some extend we're required to by signed argreements we have. Does that mean physical force? Not nessicarly. And also remember, sometimes we can lend troops, we don't need to be in charge(that is I guess, if I were running the U.S.) What do you think the responsibility should be of rich countries?

Simple, well... not that simple, but countries tshould take a proactive stance agaisnt such atrocities with the backing of the U.N. Where's the 'moral authority' of the U.N then if it can just turn a blind eye to these situations?


GD

the genocide in sudan should be handled as was or would be any other terrorist threat because that is afterall what they are. They should be handled harshly, in a no negotiation manner, noone has the right to drive innocent people from their land, or kill them especially when women and children are involved.