The Most Aggressive Defense of Teachers.....
General Discussion
Pages: 1
The Most Aggressive Defense of Teachers.....
0
posted04/26/2011 01:43 AM (UTC)by

Member Since
03/31/2011 02:00 AM (UTC)
I was at a graduation party for a friend, and we were all sitting around talking about careers and college and whatnot, and I mentioned to my friend's uncle that I was studying to be a teacher. This is something I take a lot of pride in, and something I am very excited about. He looked at me as if I'd told him I wanted to pursue a career in installing screen doors on submarines. "Yeah, but you won't make any money!" he said. So my friend posted this YouTube video on my Facebook page... this guy articulates everything I was feeling...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EzT5iKpxjFA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EzT5iKpxjFA
About Me
Puto, ergo non est deus
Non opus est, si pretium non habetis.
0
That was just fucking beautiful.
-Shoe
-Shoe
0
Good video....then I noticed one of the commenters claimed to be a teacher, and apparently doesn't know the difference between there their and they're.


About Me

MK Online Featured User 31/3/2010 12/4/2011
-----------------------Gifts-----------------------
Shinnok-fan64 - s3Kt0r
0
I agree with that. Do job you love, not job that pay you well.
I loved working in community hall because I was helping people. Yes, there was jobs that was offering me more money and hours but end of the day, I was making money for greedy pig who don't give a shit about me if I was jobless or not.
I loved working in community hall because I was helping people. Yes, there was jobs that was offering me more money and hours but end of the day, I was making money for greedy pig who don't give a shit about me if I was jobless or not.

0
Props to you for having the balls to become a teacher in the U.S. of all places.
Try not to let the unfair demonetization get to you.
Try not to let the unfair demonetization get to you.


About Me
0
Chrome Wrote:
I, as a teacher, approve.
I, as a teacher, approve.
Same sentiments here

0
FlamingTP wrote: "Good video....then I noticed one of the commenters claimed to be a teacher, and apparently doesn't know the difference between there their and they're." Their just unaware of what there doing over they're. Its hard to no what to do sumtimes win the rules of grammer r tricky.



About Me
0
That video was amazing.
About Me
Puto, ergo non est deus
Non opus est, si pretium non habetis.
0
StormChaser Wrote:
FlamingTP wrote: "Good video....then I noticed one of the commenters claimed to be a teacher, and apparently doesn't know the difference between there their and they're."
Their just unaware of what there doing over they're. Its hard to no what to do sumtimes win the rules of grammer r tricky.

FlamingTP wrote: "Good video....then I noticed one of the commenters claimed to be a teacher, and apparently doesn't know the difference between there their and they're."
Their just unaware of what there doing over they're. Its hard to no what to do sumtimes win the rules of grammer r tricky.
I don't think you're trying to troll. But your attempt at using there, their, and they're failed.
They're implementing a rule there for their enjoyment. Their rule will proposes to change things there and they're very excited. There will be no question as to why their rule exist as they're trying to correct grammar. They're there because of their ownership.
-Shoe
I dunno. He misused each instance of the homonym so perfectly it could only have been deliberate.
As much as I hated teachers when I was a child, much as a prisoner would hate his jailors, I have a supreme respect for anyone brave enough to deal with the youth of today. I have the distinct impression that, were it to fall to me, the human race would never recover.
As much as I hated teachers when I was a child, much as a prisoner would hate his jailors, I have a supreme respect for anyone brave enough to deal with the youth of today. I have the distinct impression that, were it to fall to me, the human race would never recover.

0
ShoeUnited Wrote:
I don't think you're trying to troll. But your attempt at using there, their, and they're failed.
They're implementing a rule there for their enjoyment. Their rule will proposes to change things there and they're very excited. There will be no question as to why their rule exist as they're trying to correct grammar. They're there because of their ownership.
-Shoe
StormChaser Wrote:
FlamingTP wrote: "Good video....then I noticed one of the commenters claimed to be a teacher, and apparently doesn't know the difference between there their and they're."
Their just unaware of what there doing over they're. Its hard to no what to do sumtimes win the rules of grammer r tricky.

FlamingTP wrote: "Good video....then I noticed one of the commenters claimed to be a teacher, and apparently doesn't know the difference between there their and they're."
Their just unaware of what there doing over they're. Its hard to no what to do sumtimes win the rules of grammer r tricky.
I don't think you're trying to troll. But your attempt at using there, their, and they're failed.
They're implementing a rule there for their enjoyment. Their rule will proposes to change things there and they're very excited. There will be no question as to why their rule exist as they're trying to correct grammar. They're there because of their ownership.
-Shoe
I know dude... it was a joke, hence the winking face at the end of my post.
Pages: 1
© 1998-2025 Shadow Knight Media, LLC. All rights reserved. Mortal Kombat, the dragon logo and all character names are trademarks and copyright of Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.