Johnny Cages Adventures [comic series]
0
but here's the thing, i love you artists who hate when people don;'t give you good crisitism or make sense when they're raiting you... you guys get so mad that it's cute... but i'm not saying your cute becuase i don't even know you... you're just like sharpeye... and god don't get me started with that horrible artist... but seriously you guys get so mad that its so god darn cute... you know what i mean hun? ha ha 
Sub-Frost055 Wrote:
okay. here;s something
0 / 5 for your comics because you thought my signature sucks! you don't probably even know what it is... i'll give you a cookie if you guess it right. you're an ass.
2L84ME Wrote:
Now, if you consider this an insult, I'll definitely be laughing.
When people are rating others it doesn't have to make any sense? Haha, right. That's like going to one of Jax007's art submissions, and rating it a 0/5 just for the hell of it. It does have to make sense.
Let's take for an example, official critiques. Book critiques, to be specific. It would make absolutely no sense to go up to the author of the book, and tell them something like this:
"I didn't read your book, but I can pretty much tell that it sucks by noticing the type of font you used. 0/10."
Don't try to make a point when what you're saying makes no sense.
Oh the irony of it all =/
@Zentile
USUALLY when people say "overall", they combine the scores that they have for the separate categories (if they rated by category) and total them up.
Sub-Frost055 Wrote:
you're obviously taking this WAY too seriously, first off, computers suck showing feelings, so people wouldn't technically understand that what you just said was exaggerated. people don't have to make sense when raiting you on your work. i'm not being rude here, but you're making a big scene out of something that's so pointless. i'd be laughing if you came back to insult me... because there's really no point. but i'm just saying people don't have to make sense when raiting you. just be happy that they give you points instead of nothing. just be proud of that.
2L84ME Wrote:
If someone is giving you a detailed response and rating, and they supply different ratings for separate categories, the combined total of those numbers is what the overall rating is. An overall rating isn't:
5/5, I liked the art.
4/5, I like the concept.
So overall that's a 3/5, cause you got some stuff to work on.
No.
And at your response to my previous post, have you EVER heard of exaggeration? 5/5 + 1/5 = 3/5, not 2/5. What's so hard about that?
When you see some reviews around here, you mostly see:
Nice concept, but the art was lacking. 5/5
It just doesn't fucking work.
Iori9 Wrote:
You guys are missing the point of "overall" rating, its not that you just add all the points together, its what you think about the overall thing that you are rating, if someone gave them a lot of 5/5's before, then I strongly doubt they will give overall 0/5
Some people sometimes average out the whole ratings together, but I just tell them what I think about the art/project/whatever in all the aspects, the rating can be pretty random as well, because you combine both positive aspects, and both negatives aspects, it depends what you think of both, for example:
If one review gave someone a 4/5 for something, and 0/5 for art or something else that they hated a lot, put them in the overall score, he begins to realize how bad the art or whatever ruined the game/thing/project and did not care about the other thing he rated on because of this and its up ratting it a 2/5ish
Anyway, I am not good at explaining stuff in text, as you can see, but I did what I could.
You guys are missing the point of "overall" rating, its not that you just add all the points together, its what you think about the overall thing that you are rating, if someone gave them a lot of 5/5's before, then I strongly doubt they will give overall 0/5
Some people sometimes average out the whole ratings together, but I just tell them what I think about the art/project/whatever in all the aspects, the rating can be pretty random as well, because you combine both positive aspects, and both negatives aspects, it depends what you think of both, for example:
If one review gave someone a 4/5 for something, and 0/5 for art or something else that they hated a lot, put them in the overall score, he begins to realize how bad the art or whatever ruined the game/thing/project and did not care about the other thing he rated on because of this and its up ratting it a 2/5ish
Anyway, I am not good at explaining stuff in text, as you can see, but I did what I could.
If someone is giving you a detailed response and rating, and they supply different ratings for separate categories, the combined total of those numbers is what the overall rating is. An overall rating isn't:
5/5, I liked the art.
4/5, I like the concept.
So overall that's a 3/5, cause you got some stuff to work on.
No.
And at your response to my previous post, have you EVER heard of exaggeration? 5/5 + 1/5 = 3/5, not 2/5. What's so hard about that?
When you see some reviews around here, you mostly see:
Nice concept, but the art was lacking. 5/5
It just doesn't fucking work.
you're obviously taking this WAY too seriously, first off, computers suck showing feelings, so people wouldn't technically understand that what you just said was exaggerated. people don't have to make sense when raiting you on your work. i'm not being rude here, but you're making a big scene out of something that's so pointless. i'd be laughing if you came back to insult me... because there's really no point. but i'm just saying people don't have to make sense when raiting you. just be happy that they give you points instead of nothing. just be proud of that.
Now, if you consider this an insult, I'll definitely be laughing.
When people are rating others it doesn't have to make any sense? Haha, right. That's like going to one of Jax007's art submissions, and rating it a 0/5 just for the hell of it. It does have to make sense.
Let's take for an example, official critiques. Book critiques, to be specific. It would make absolutely no sense to go up to the author of the book, and tell them something like this:
"I didn't read your book, but I can pretty much tell that it sucks by noticing the type of font you used. 0/10."
Don't try to make a point when what you're saying makes no sense.
Oh the irony of it all =/
@Zentile
USUALLY when people say "overall", they combine the scores that they have for the separate categories (if they rated by category) and total them up.
okay. here;s something
0 / 5 for your comics because you thought my signature sucks! you don't probably even know what it is... i'll give you a cookie if you guess it right. you're an ass.
Haha, obviously you don't understand what I was trying to prove.
RATINGS.HAVE.TO.MAKE.SENSE.
Hopefully you've learned that by my comment about your already crappy signature.
P.S.
I don't have to know what the hell your signature is, to know that it completely sucks ass anyway.
0
...stop whining about 1 small post.You don't have to "total them up" like you said,you expect me to give you 6/5 for those comics.jokes are way more important than the placed sprites.If you want to get a 5/5 for the sprites Submit a Fake.Stop whining about other people's posts and I gave you a 1/5 not because I was mad at your other post,but because it was my honest score...you kept acting like an ass about it.It's just a fucking score for your shitty little comics.Just stop whining about it....-_-" You don't have a 'gift' for comics,that's for sure.Try something new instead of acting like an 8-year old on the internet.I try to help you out ,but all you do is take the negative shit up your ass.We're just trying to help by saying to make them .Keyword-Funny
Cyber_EV1L Wrote:
...stop whining about 1 small post.You don't have to "total them up" like you said,you expect me to give you 6/5 for those comics.jokes are way more important than the placed sprites.If you want to get a 5/5 for the sprites Submit a Fake.Stop whining about other people's posts and I gave you a 1/5 not because I was mad at your other post,but because it was my honest score...you kept acting like an ass about it.It's just a fucking score for your shitty little comics.Just stop whining about it....-_-"
...stop whining about 1 small post.You don't have to "total them up" like you said,you expect me to give you 6/5 for those comics.jokes are way more important than the placed sprites.If you want to get a 5/5 for the sprites Submit a Fake.Stop whining about other people's posts and I gave you a 1/5 not because I was mad at your other post,but because it was my honest score...you kept acting like an ass about it.It's just a fucking score for your shitty little comics.Just stop whining about it....-_-"
You see, this is why I don't give a shit about your critique. You aren't being honest, and only lower it because it'll make you feel better about yourself. You try to insult me because you're ticked off and can't handle the situation maturely. THIS is why I don't give a damn about your scores, your ratings, your critique, or your posts, because it really doesn't freaking matter.
0
2L84ME Wrote:
You see, this is why I don't give a shit about your critique. You aren't being honest, and only lower it because it'll make you feel better about yourself. You try to insult me because you're ticked off and can't handle the situation maturely. THIS is why I don't give a damn about your scores, your ratings, your critique, or your posts, because it really doesn't freaking matter.
Cyber_EV1L Wrote:
...stop whining about 1 small post.You don't have to "total them up" like you said,you expect me to give you 6/5 for those comics.jokes are way more important than the placed sprites.If you want to get a 5/5 for the sprites Submit a Fake.Stop whining about other people's posts and I gave you a 1/5 not because I was mad at your other post,but because it was my honest score...you kept acting like an ass about it.It's just a fucking score for your shitty little comics.Just stop whining about it....-_-"
...stop whining about 1 small post.You don't have to "total them up" like you said,you expect me to give you 6/5 for those comics.jokes are way more important than the placed sprites.If you want to get a 5/5 for the sprites Submit a Fake.Stop whining about other people's posts and I gave you a 1/5 not because I was mad at your other post,but because it was my honest score...you kept acting like an ass about it.It's just a fucking score for your shitty little comics.Just stop whining about it....-_-"
You see, this is why I don't give a shit about your critique. You aren't being honest, and only lower it because it'll make you feel better about yourself. You try to insult me because you're ticked off and can't handle the situation maturely. THIS is why I don't give a damn about your scores, your ratings, your critique, or your posts, because it really doesn't freaking matter.
If you don't give a damn why do you keep on whining about it.I gave you an honest score,you can't handle it maturely.
0
2L84ME Wrote:
Haha, obviously you don't understand what I was trying to prove.
RATINGS.HAVE.TO.MAKE.SENSE.
Hopefully you've learned that by my comment about your already crappy signature.
P.S.
I don't have to know what the hell your signature is, to know that it completely sucks ass anyway.
Sub-Frost055 Wrote:
okay. here;s something
0 / 5 for your comics because you thought my signature sucks! you don't probably even know what it is... i'll give you a cookie if you guess it right. you're an ass.
2L84ME Wrote:
Now, if you consider this an insult, I'll definitely be laughing.
When people are rating others it doesn't have to make any sense? Haha, right. That's like going to one of Jax007's art submissions, and rating it a 0/5 just for the hell of it. It does have to make sense.
Let's take for an example, official critiques. Book critiques, to be specific. It would make absolutely no sense to go up to the author of the book, and tell them something like this:
"I didn't read your book, but I can pretty much tell that it sucks by noticing the type of font you used. 0/10."
Don't try to make a point when what you're saying makes no sense.
Oh the irony of it all =/
@Zentile
USUALLY when people say "overall", they combine the scores that they have for the separate categories (if they rated by category) and total them up.
Sub-Frost055 Wrote:
you're obviously taking this WAY too seriously, first off, computers suck showing feelings, so people wouldn't technically understand that what you just said was exaggerated. people don't have to make sense when raiting you on your work. i'm not being rude here, but you're making a big scene out of something that's so pointless. i'd be laughing if you came back to insult me... because there's really no point. but i'm just saying people don't have to make sense when raiting you. just be happy that they give you points instead of nothing. just be proud of that.
2L84ME Wrote:
If someone is giving you a detailed response and rating, and they supply different ratings for separate categories, the combined total of those numbers is what the overall rating is. An overall rating isn't:
5/5, I liked the art.
4/5, I like the concept.
So overall that's a 3/5, cause you got some stuff to work on.
No.
And at your response to my previous post, have you EVER heard of exaggeration? 5/5 + 1/5 = 3/5, not 2/5. What's so hard about that?
When you see some reviews around here, you mostly see:
Nice concept, but the art was lacking. 5/5
It just doesn't fucking work.
Iori9 Wrote:
You guys are missing the point of "overall" rating, its not that you just add all the points together, its what you think about the overall thing that you are rating, if someone gave them a lot of 5/5's before, then I strongly doubt they will give overall 0/5
Some people sometimes average out the whole ratings together, but I just tell them what I think about the art/project/whatever in all the aspects, the rating can be pretty random as well, because you combine both positive aspects, and both negatives aspects, it depends what you think of both, for example:
If one review gave someone a 4/5 for something, and 0/5 for art or something else that they hated a lot, put them in the overall score, he begins to realize how bad the art or whatever ruined the game/thing/project and did not care about the other thing he rated on because of this and its up ratting it a 2/5ish
Anyway, I am not good at explaining stuff in text, as you can see, but I did what I could.
You guys are missing the point of "overall" rating, its not that you just add all the points together, its what you think about the overall thing that you are rating, if someone gave them a lot of 5/5's before, then I strongly doubt they will give overall 0/5
Some people sometimes average out the whole ratings together, but I just tell them what I think about the art/project/whatever in all the aspects, the rating can be pretty random as well, because you combine both positive aspects, and both negatives aspects, it depends what you think of both, for example:
If one review gave someone a 4/5 for something, and 0/5 for art or something else that they hated a lot, put them in the overall score, he begins to realize how bad the art or whatever ruined the game/thing/project and did not care about the other thing he rated on because of this and its up ratting it a 2/5ish
Anyway, I am not good at explaining stuff in text, as you can see, but I did what I could.
If someone is giving you a detailed response and rating, and they supply different ratings for separate categories, the combined total of those numbers is what the overall rating is. An overall rating isn't:
5/5, I liked the art.
4/5, I like the concept.
So overall that's a 3/5, cause you got some stuff to work on.
No.
And at your response to my previous post, have you EVER heard of exaggeration? 5/5 + 1/5 = 3/5, not 2/5. What's so hard about that?
When you see some reviews around here, you mostly see:
Nice concept, but the art was lacking. 5/5
It just doesn't fucking work.
you're obviously taking this WAY too seriously, first off, computers suck showing feelings, so people wouldn't technically understand that what you just said was exaggerated. people don't have to make sense when raiting you on your work. i'm not being rude here, but you're making a big scene out of something that's so pointless. i'd be laughing if you came back to insult me... because there's really no point. but i'm just saying people don't have to make sense when raiting you. just be happy that they give you points instead of nothing. just be proud of that.
Now, if you consider this an insult, I'll definitely be laughing.
When people are rating others it doesn't have to make any sense? Haha, right. That's like going to one of Jax007's art submissions, and rating it a 0/5 just for the hell of it. It does have to make sense.
Let's take for an example, official critiques. Book critiques, to be specific. It would make absolutely no sense to go up to the author of the book, and tell them something like this:
"I didn't read your book, but I can pretty much tell that it sucks by noticing the type of font you used. 0/10."
Don't try to make a point when what you're saying makes no sense.
Oh the irony of it all =/
@Zentile
USUALLY when people say "overall", they combine the scores that they have for the separate categories (if they rated by category) and total them up.
okay. here;s something
0 / 5 for your comics because you thought my signature sucks! you don't probably even know what it is... i'll give you a cookie if you guess it right. you're an ass.
Haha, obviously you don't understand what I was trying to prove.
RATINGS.HAVE.TO.MAKE.SENSE.
Hopefully you've learned that by my comment about your already crappy signature.
P.S.
I don't have to know what the hell your signature is, to know that it completely sucks ass anyway.
that's becuase you really don't know what it is. i don't care if its crappy, i was'nt intentionally making it THE GREATEST SIGNATURE EVER it's a snapshot from a game, you'll never see THE GREATEST SNAPSHOT EVER from a picture. you want crit here's crit
your comics suck becuase its copy and paste, boooooring
they're not funny
i stopped reading them after the first one because it was that crappy
i can make sense or not, but pal here's something, i highly doubt you're going to get any nice comments about anything you make in the future becuase you make too big of a fucking deal about raiting... not to mention that people here probably hate you because of you whining about stupid scores. wow
and by the way that thread was showing off signatures not raiting them learn to read what the thread is suppose to be loser before saying anything. because you just made yourself look like an idiot by saying that it sucks and raiting it in that thread/. that thread is to show off what you've done with sigs... i just wanna know what they think about a snapshot signature from a game you don't even know what its from. i laugh at you becuase over 5 billion people play this world wide. not make it the greatest thing ever to set their eyes on it.
zentile doesn't have to be nice in critising your work nor does he have to be mean
people don't have to add right or add wrong to give you a score. be proud that they're at least giving you something, as for me, i took my vote on what i thought about your work because you insult people who are giving you advice. here's a tip for next time buddy, you want people to be nice to you and judge your work, you be nice to them, whether they're your online friends or not, you don't have any right either insulting them or humiliating them (which i highly doubt) beaucse something didn't make sense.
stop arguing with cyber_ev1l, he's abosolutely right and i'm taking his damn side on this situation becuase he's right.
just for everyone's sake and mine, stop whining.
(And all of the above is not whining, its common sense, you'll know what it means once you understand the full meaning of it.... which you obviously don't.)
not to mention that your arguing with people you have no idea who they are and like. so shut up and eat your beans.
I barely skimmed through your useless message, but here's what I have to say:
I've gotten plenty of nice comics, just go check out the old version of this thread. Almost every single comment made were compliments, and I've been getting high ratings since, even from other forums. This is why I hardly care for your opinion, you're pushing it too far to let it be known that my comics suck. They don't, it's just your opinion.
And don't make the mistake by thinking you've been here longer than I have. I've been here since 2003, hun. I know PLENTY of people around here.
I've gotten plenty of nice comics, just go check out the old version of this thread. Almost every single comment made were compliments, and I've been getting high ratings since, even from other forums. This is why I hardly care for your opinion, you're pushing it too far to let it be known that my comics suck. They don't, it's just your opinion.
And don't make the mistake by thinking you've been here longer than I have. I've been here since 2003, hun. I know PLENTY of people around here.
0
there's an old thread? ha ha, what happened? you probably also skimmed through the important parts of my point... and no, raitings.do.not.have.to.make.sense. i don't care how long you've been on this site... and DON'T YOU EVER CALL ME HUN!
© 1998-2025 Shadow Knight Media, LLC. All rights reserved. Mortal Kombat, the dragon logo and all character names are trademarks and copyright of Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.