well i was hoping that they knew for sure who was goin to be sub zero but oh well, some news i better than no news.
Azure_Lightning Wrote:
Forget MK Annihilation?
I don't think so. If they're making it a sequel os the first movie, what, are they gonna fight Shao Kahn again? You can't disregard the fact that Shao Kahn DOES appear in the end of the first movie. They can't just throw that in the garbage.
And if they think that Annihilation sucked, well, suck it up and try to make it better next time. It's not like you can simply ignore a sequel that didn't do too well and do another version. It doesn't work like that. IMHO, a movie loses all its credibilty by doing that.
they decided not to count annihilation because not only the movie turned out bad, but they also messed up the storyline ( shao khan being raiden;s brother, raiden fighting 3 reptiles - for no reason and out of nowhere, sheeva dying, shinnock being tossed into another dimension -or something like that- by the elder gods, rain dying, shao khan dying).
what i don;t understand is how come raiden is an elder god ( which is represented thru smoke ........the god of thunder which shoots lightning btw is represented by smoke........) and how they can resurect johnny cage if he was still alive at the end of the first movie ( and pretty damn popular for beating scorpion and goro). the last thing to add to this is that i don;t see Anderson's name as director........and why is that? we all know he's directing it.
because of all that ^ i think this thread is based on lies to start with. you can't make a sequal to the mk movie and ignore mk: annihilation, but still count in MK3 what happened in mk2 -which they just stated they;re pushing aside. how much sese does that make? does anyone know what i mean?
