Should i buy MK:Trilogy or MK3?
2D Kombat Klassics
Pages: 1
Should i buy MK:Trilogy or MK3?
0
posted06/25/2003 09:56 PM (UTC)by

Which is better?


About Me
0
scorpio Wrote: get both of them...but if you are just wanting one, the choice is obviouse. |
I only want one, so what is the obvious choice? Trilogy?


About Me
http://www.animevisions.net/Pictures/gifs/kenshin.gif
0
Yes.
Trilogy feutures more characters,fatalities,babalities,brutalities,fergatality(hint hint only one of those.),etc.
So choose MKTrilogy.
Trilogy feutures more characters,fatalities,babalities,brutalities,fergatality(hint hint only one of those.),etc.
So choose MKTrilogy.
0
no contest.. trilogy is mk3 with double the characters.


About Me
0
i have ps2 which can read older playstation games


About Me
<a href="http://www.mkodyssey.net" <img src="http://img20.photobucket.com/albums/v61/ChiefThunder/mkoblue.gif"
0
yes


About Me
0
trilogy is mk3 plus mk2 plus mk1 all put into one so i would say trilogy is the better choice


About Me
0
Trilogy with out a doubt. It has more characters and better cheats. Not to mention better fatalities.

0
Trilogy definatly, unless you are getting it for PC, then go with MK3.

0
Trilogy definatly, unless you are getting it for PC, then go with MK3.
Sub-Zero4Evr Wrote: Trilogy definatly, unless you are getting it for PC, then go with MK3. |
I have Triogy for PC and it works exelent! From what Ive seen the best Mk games are the Arcades and Pcs. For example, Mk4 is kind a crappy in PS, BUt in PC its exelent!
So, go for MkTrilogy, BUT I recomend U to buy them both. For some reason, is not the same feeling. When i play Mk3 there are just so many things I like of it BETTER then in Trilogy, but when playing Trilogy, there are BILLIONS of things that are better then Mk3.

0
you should get trilogy it has better sound effects sounds like your in the arcade when you play it everyone has a fatality only 1 problem there isnt away to make pit fatals one button.oops forgot you cannot perform the pit2 fatal.i give it a 9.8 out of 10
UREIKO Wrote: queve Wrote: When i play Mk3 there are just so many things I like of it BETTER then in Trilogy. The things that are in MK3 are in Trilogy. |
No, not really. Like, the charcatres, when fighting with them, they feel more free and faster, better then in Trilogy. I guess I like it a lot since it was the first Mk game I ever owned.
AND also it has those COOL intro pics (The people dying, Motaros army, Sindel reviving, Sonya runnig after Kano) and the COOL bio pics that arent In Trilogy.
Not everything mk3 has MkTrilogy has.
I agree. Playing MK3 is not the same as MKT.
MK 3 has it's own vibe. The smaller roster, the strictly MK3 backgrounds and the presentation(the intro, the battleplan, ect.) all give it it's own feel.
MKT feels more like an uber game. Like one big mish mash of games. While it does follow the MK3 story and it is part of the storyline, it still feels like a "dream match" game.
Overall I think MKT is a better game but yeah, I also like to just play MK3 and UMK3 from time to time.
MK 3 has it's own vibe. The smaller roster, the strictly MK3 backgrounds and the presentation(the intro, the battleplan, ect.) all give it it's own feel.
MKT feels more like an uber game. Like one big mish mash of games. While it does follow the MK3 story and it is part of the storyline, it still feels like a "dream match" game.
Overall I think MKT is a better game but yeah, I also like to just play MK3 and UMK3 from time to time.
Pages: 1
© 1998-2025 Shadow Knight Media, LLC. All rights reserved. Mortal Kombat, the dragon logo and all character names are trademarks and copyright of Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.