SNES MK3 Vs MAT2 MK3
0
posted10/29/2004 11:45 PM (UTC)by
Avatar
theREALganondorf
Avatar
Member Since
10/12/2004 03:05 PM (UTC)
So last time I had PS one MK3 VS MAT2 MK3 and

everyone agreed that the PS one version had better graphics, sounds etc.

All in all much better then the so called Perfect arcade version HA!!!

But anyways here is a new match

SNES MK3 Vs MAT2 MK3

I thought this would give the MAT2 MK3 a fighting chance...or so I thought

The backgrounds in each version are identical which prooves that the MK3 on MAT2 is not arcade perfect. They just took it from a SNES game.

The sprites are the same size, and the music is the same

that means these programers took the game from the SNES version and slapped it on a PS2 DVD.

WHat lazy bastards!
Avatar
AloneInLife
10/28/2004 09:07 PM (UTC)
0
maybe you should check your psone MK3 vs MAT2 MK3 topic again. are you riddict by any chance?
Avatar
Tony
Avatar
About Me

SubZero
==================================
Systems:Wii
Currently Playing: Sonic and the Secret Rings
==================================

10/28/2004 09:19 PM (UTC)
0
The SNES version of MK 3 doesn't stand a chance against the MK 3 from Midway Arcade treasures. The MK 3 from MAT 2 is the arcade version. Granted there are a few bugs in the game but it doesn't make the game fall into the "worse than the SNES version" category.

The last time I checked, the backrounds look similar, but the SNES quality is no where near the quality of MK 3 on MAT 2. The sprites on the SNES are smaller and are missing animation.

The game on MAT 2 is MK 3 like I remember from the arcade days and I love it. The PS one game is a great translation too. The PS version had all the original backrounds, and music, sounds etc, but was missing frames of animation and suffered from some annoying load times. Remember Shang Tsungs morphing problem? Give me MAT 2 MK 3 anyday!
Avatar
MK2KungBroken
Avatar
About Me
The Prophet - R.I.P. 1979-2006www.kombatnetwork.com
- Your Source for UMK3 Competition -
When something better than UMK3 comes out, I'll let you all know, because it still hasn't happened yet.
10/29/2004 06:00 AM (UTC)
0
Only thing I can say for SNES is at least they did the best they could with what little they had to work with.

Matt
Avatar
Rayado
Avatar
About Me

10/29/2004 08:01 PM (UTC)
0
Yeah, they did make MK 3 for SNES pretty good, but the sounds were horrible. Does anyone know why there was so little blood in Genesis and Snes? Cuz when they ported MK II on both systems, they had decent amounts of blood from the arcade (not all the blood, but a good amount)
Peace
Avatar
dreemernj
10/29/2004 11:45 PM (UTC)
0
Yeah, they really maxed out the SNES when they were making MK2 and MK3. I thought they were okay. UMK3, honestly, pushed the limits too far for the SNES and I think that game stunk.

And also, PSone MK3 had terrible graphics and does not stand up next to MAT2 MK3.
Pages: 1
Discord
Twitch
Twitter
YouTube
Facebook
Privacy Policy
© 1998-2025 Shadow Knight Media, LLC. All rights reserved. Mortal Kombat, the dragon logo and all character names are trademarks and copyright of Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.