Theme ImageMortal Kombat Online
Kombat KontentDiscussionsTournamentsCalendarKastsKreationsGamesNewsFight Klub
Theme Image0 visitingIcon332 chatting
Sign In
2D Kombat Klassics
Pages: 1
1
Sub bosses vs Boss ( MK1-MK4)
0
posted09/07/2003 11:07 AM (UTC)by
Avatar
FROST4584
Avatar
Member Since
08/18/2003 06:27 AM (UTC)
I've been playing MK since it 1st came out in 1992. Through out the years I have noticed that the subboss are 50% harder than the Final boss. I mean I had a harder time with Goro, Kintaro and Motaro, than Tsung and Khan. End the end the sub boss seem like they could beat the bosses. I would like to hear others opinions about this, and thanks for your time.

PS I hope Dragon King and the sub boss for MK6 is super hard. I like a good fight.
Avatar
Alpha_Q_Up
Avatar
 •09/07/2003 06:08 AM (UTC) •
0
Mk1-GOro could probably beat Shang
MK2-A close one,but porbably Kintaro
MK3-Shoa Kahn would woop Motaros ass
MK4-Hell if stryker was the sub-boss he would win
MKDA-Moloch could beat Shang and Quan chi at the same time
Avatar
balkcsiaboot
Avatar
 •09/07/2003 11:07 AM (UTC) •
0
Well, for me...

MK1 - Goro was damn easy compared to Shang.
MK2 - Kintaro was tough, but still easy compared to Kahn.
MK3 - Motaro was fucking hard as hell. Kahn was easier
MK4 - Goro was cheap as shit, and Shinnok just sucked. He was an easy boss
MKDA - Moloch is one cheap ass bitch. He's a lot harder than the bosess.

I don't know about you, but I'm talking about the ARCADE versions. In the consoles it's a lot different. Except MKDA, of course.

For SNES, The only thing that changes is that Goro is harder than Shang Tsung in MK1. But they're both pretty easy. The rest of the games I think stays the same.
Pages: 1
1
Reply to Thread
Discord
Twitch
Twitter
YouTube
Facebook
Privacy Policy
© 1998-2025 Shadow Knight Media, LLC. All rights reserved. Mortal Kombat, the dragon logo and all character names are trademarks and copyright of Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.