which classic games had the best graphics for fatalities?
0
posted04/06/2004 07:55 PM (UTC)by
Avatar
sektor101
Avatar
Member Since
03/05/2004 08:56 PM (UTC)
i think it was mk2 and mk4 it was cool mk2 u can see body parts flying in the screen.mk4 the 3-d camaras were awesome u can see everyway what ure doing to the guy/girl and the graphics were awesome new charchter were nice. a million thanks for the mk tem for making those 2 game exactly the way the did it.
Avatar
takermk
04/05/2004 06:25 PM (UTC)
0
MK2
Avatar
Matt41
04/05/2004 06:28 PM (UTC)
0
MK2
Avatar
Hideo_Sakaguchi
Avatar
About Me

Must kill Sub-Zero. Whee~

04/05/2004 06:55 PM (UTC)
0
MK 2, especially with the stuff like the insides coming out and what have you. Not to mention the body (or what's left of it) falling over when the move was done. I thought it was pretty stupid in MK 3/UMK 3/MK Trilogy that once you decapitate someone, they continued standing straight up, or the hands would hover next to the body if you knocked their torso in half or whatever. The bones and legs didn't look half as cool as the insides shown in MK 2 (why they didn't just use the character's own arms and legs for the Fatalities I don't know), not to mention in many cases you have two or three skulls, four pairs of legs/arms, an extra rip cage or two, etc. No to mention 90% of the moves ended up with your oponent exploding in some form or another. Got old after awhile.

MK 4 was better than MK 3 in most cases. It's only flaw was lack of original finishers. More than half the moves were just 3D versions of classic 2D Fatalities. It was cool seeing them in 3D, but at the same time seeing them in 3D doesn't make up for the lack of new Fatalities. The game also suffered from the 'explosion' factor as well. Too many sequences centered around the Fatality causing your oponent to explode. Once again it gets boring after a while.

MK 1 has great finishers, especially for its time. Overall, I'd rank MK 1 over MK 3 and 4 in terms of Fatalities. MK 3 and 4 may have had more, but MK 1 had quality. Most of MK 3's were either exploding moves or just plain stupid (such as Jax's Stomp, both of Kabal's, Liu Kang's Arcade drop, both of Rain/Human Smoke/Noob's, Kung Lao's Hat Slice, ect), let alone the multiple body parts. MK 4's, again nice looking, was pretty much the same-old, same-old and a lot of the orignal finishers weren't that great (exception being Quan Chi's leg rip). Most of the moves came straight out of MK 1-3 in some form or another. MK 1 at least had (at then) original and unique moves.

From best to worst, I'd go with 1) MK 2, 2) MK 1, 3) MK 4, and 4) MK 3.
Avatar
sektor101
04/05/2004 07:11 PM (UTC)
0
i have to agree with all of u mk2 is a really good game the graphics r cool the fatalities were just awesome especially kung lao the hat slice awesome mk2 is a really good game but all the other games were ok
Avatar
Zero_Beats
04/05/2004 10:34 PM (UTC)
0
MK2.
Avatar
predac0n
04/06/2004 12:42 AM (UTC)
0
MK2
Avatar
Dark_No0B
04/06/2004 01:10 AM (UTC)
0
Definately MK2.
MK2
Avatar
MK2KungBroken
Avatar
About Me
The Prophet - R.I.P. 1979-2006www.kombatnetwork.com
- Your Source for UMK3 Competition -
When something better than UMK3 comes out, I'll let you all know, because it still hasn't happened yet.
04/06/2004 08:08 AM (UTC)
0
MK3, uh umm I mean 2.
Avatar
sektor101
04/06/2004 07:55 PM (UTC)
0
nice everybody is with mk2 cool grin
Pages: 1
Discord
Twitch
Twitter
YouTube
Facebook
Privacy Policy
© 1998-2025 Shadow Knight Media, LLC. All rights reserved. Mortal Kombat, the dragon logo and all character names are trademarks and copyright of Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.