regarding shao khan
0
posted01/01/2004 11:15 PM (UTC)by
Avatar
outworld222
Avatar
Member Since
09/15/2003 03:46 AM (UTC)
All Im saying is in all my years of existance, I never eeeeeever thought shoa khan would get humiliated and gotten his head knocked off by two undeserving punks. I still cant believe that he is dead or possibly but less likely injured. Wow. Just amazing. The mk team sure knows how to make suspense.
I seriously doubt it is the last time weve heard of him. he will be back in future mks.
Avatar
mister_satan666
Avatar
About Me

http://www.mefi.org/ Check this website (very important). My gf's family is hosting a fundraising event next month so check out the website for details. We accept Paypal donations.

12/01/2003 08:56 PM (UTC)
0
i hope he is only mentioned in name

quan chi is a much better villian
Avatar
outworld222
12/01/2003 09:18 PM (UTC)
0
I kinda agree with you on that, but I have to ask youre opinion, do you think in mk 4 quan chi was a bigger villan than shinnok? Did he kinda overshadow him?
Avatar
mister_satan666
Avatar
About Me

http://www.mefi.org/ Check this website (very important). My gf's family is hosting a fundraising event next month so check out the website for details. We accept Paypal donations.

12/01/2003 09:31 PM (UTC)
0
in game quan chi was more powerful

in storyline shinnok was more powerful

yet quan chi used his trickery to defeat shinnok
Avatar
Godzilla
12/02/2003 08:29 PM (UTC)
0
If Shang Tsung could morph in MKDA, that would be so cool.
Avatar
izzy_daman
12/02/2003 08:32 PM (UTC)
0
Khan is the best villian there ever is, was , and ever will be in MK history, period. I would definately love to see him back in MK6 as a playable character. Doesn't need to be a boss or sub-boss. He should come back with a killer story line, a hot ass new look, and a new arsenal of devasting moves.
Avatar
Subzero_5th
12/04/2003 05:15 PM (UTC)
0
I totally agree. Kahn is a far more better villain than Quan Chi. Not to mention more powerful. Even in his weakened form he could have taken Quan Chi and Shang Tsung one on one with either one. But in his strongest position it would be worse for the 2 puny sorcerers. We haven't seen the last of Kahn according to Midway.
Avatar
DeathScepter
Avatar
About Me

Save a life; Kill a necromorph

12/05/2003 02:12 AM (UTC)
0
Shao Kahn as a playable character howbeit powerful one.

I do think that He should be rivals with the Dragon King.
Avatar
Moosie_Fate
12/05/2003 10:24 AM (UTC)
0
I think it'd be cool if MK6 was a much darker game where Shao Kahn battled against the Dragon Kings forces and Raidens earth forces acted as a covert operation trying to bring down each group from the inside because they know their only chance for survival is to attack while Khans & the DK’s attention is focussed towards each other. That way Kahn & the DK can be boss and sub boss in either order depending on who you play as, but both would be unplayable.

It’d also be cool if Raiden was a boss and every fighter was allied with either Kahn the DK or Raiden and the bosses you face are the leaders of the two opposition groups.
Kahn is my favorite Boss character. I would love for him to be in MK6. The idea of having Kahn vs the Dragon king is awesome. Although, I don't know how much Kahn can do, seeing as how he was beaten by two weaklings compared to him that is. It doesn't look good for him imo.
Avatar
Born-Again-Vampire
Avatar
About Me

Anything war can do, peace can do better.
12/17/2003 06:27 AM (UTC)
0
I would like to see more sides than good and evil. I would like to see the lines blur, and maybe choose different paths in a story mode.
moosie_fate Wrote:
I think it'd be cool if MK6 was a much darker game where Shao Kahn battled against the Dragon Kings forces and Raidens earth forces acted as a covert operation trying to bring down each group from the inside because they know their only chance for survival is to attack while Khans & the DK’s attention is focussed towards each other. That way Kahn & the DK can be boss and sub boss in either order depending on who you play as, but both would be unplayable.

It’d also be cool if Raiden was a boss and every fighter was allied with either Kahn the DK or Raiden and the bosses you face are the leaders of the two opposition groups.

Avatar
Subzero_5th
12/17/2003 06:00 PM (UTC)
0
Kahn was only beaten by those 2 weaker villains because he himself was weak. Had it been one on one with either of them The Emperor would have won.
Avatar
queve
12/17/2003 07:20 PM (UTC)
0
Shao Khan was a cool character...but I dont want to see him again. He was used to much! I want a new boss. Not Kahn again, let him rest...dead.
Avatar
subzero961
12/17/2003 07:33 PM (UTC)
0
Kahn was only used in 2 games. I agree with the posters about Shao Kahn being the strongest villian in MK. Shao Kahn should most definately make a comeback.
queve Wrote:
Shao Khan was a cool character...but I dont want to see him again. He was used to much! I want a new boss. Not Kahn again, let him rest...dead.

Avatar
outworld222
12/17/2003 07:41 PM (UTC)
0

"Kahn was only beaten by those 2 weaker villains because he himself was weak. Had it been one on one with either of them The Emperor would have won."

All fighters know that if you were taken on by two fighters, nomatter how good you are, you WILL probably get taken down. Thats just common sense. Many of you have nephews and little kids running around. This is just an example. You know that you could probably neutralize a kid. But even when two little kids are attacking you(just for fun) you probably know that they are dominating you, in other words, even two little kids ganging up on an adult is still a force to be wreckened with.
Avatar
Born-Again-Vampire
Avatar
About Me

Anything war can do, peace can do better.
12/17/2003 10:49 PM (UTC)
0
Only when we are talking about 3 equal species. Two humans don't have a good change against a great white! But I get your drift and Shang and Quan are powerfull- they are just empty characters.
outworld222 Wrote:

"Kahn was only beaten by those 2 weaker villains because he himself was weak. Had it been one on one with either of them The Emperor would have won."

All fighters know that if you were taken on by two fighters, nomatter how good you are, you WILL probably get taken down. Thats just common sense. Many of you have nephews and little kids running around. This is just an example. You know that you could probably neutralize a kid. But even when two little kids are attacking you(just for fun) you probably know that they are dominating you, in other words, even two little kids ganging up on an adult is still a force to be wreckened with.

Avatar
Sub-Saibot
Avatar
About Me

www.facebook.com/dyerseve88

12/18/2003 01:28 AM (UTC)
0
So MK2, MK3, UMK3, and MK: Trilogy is 2 games huh?


subzero961 Wrote:
Kahn was only used in 2 games.

font>

Avatar
Subzero_5th
12/18/2003 04:35 PM (UTC)
0
I know what you mean Outworld. But this isn't real life. This is MK.
Avatar
SNAKE_EATER
Avatar
About Me

new forum http://s11.invisionfree.com/ultimaterevange/index.php?act=idx

12/20/2003 07:19 AM (UTC)
0
like tealc said (quote) i have seen many gou'ould suck up there conquere and then when they have gain there trust annhilate them

what if shao kahn was takon over by the dragon king and only a meer servant but in the next game he takes away the dragon kings armies

what do ya think
Avatar
Born-Again-Vampire
Avatar
About Me

Anything war can do, peace can do better.
12/20/2003 07:26 AM (UTC)
0
I agree but I think some people consider MK3, MKU, MKT as one game.
Sub-Saibot Wrote:
So MK2, MK3, UMK3, and MK: Trilogy is 2 games huh?


subzero961 Wrote:
Kahn was only used in 2 games.

font>

Avatar
FROST4584
12/20/2003 09:15 AM (UTC)
0

born-again-vampire Wrote:
I agree but I think some people consider MK3, MKU, MKT as one game.
Sub-Saibot Wrote:
So MK2, MK3, UMK3, and MK: Trilogy is 2 games huh?


subzero961 Wrote:
Kahn was only used in 2 games.

font>


I think 3 was one large game ment to connect the dots till MKT. To me MK3 was broken off into 3 parts, just like star wars 1 2 3 and 4,5,6. These Movies and MK3 are dealt in miccro storylines that took more than 1 game to explain. i do consider MK3,UMK3,MKT in terms of extending the storyline much like star wars has with its . triolgy. getting back to the topic, I liked Khan the best in terms of bosses but he got used up. like the person said above Khan was in MK2 to MKT. I am tired of him. Shinnok wasn't hard at all in MK4 and Tsung and Chi weren't hard in MK :DA. I hope that Dragon King and the sub boss are super hard.
I hope the 1st Pic of someone in MK6 is Frost and Midway gives us a Christmas pic of something in MK6.
Avatar
queve
12/23/2003 02:12 PM (UTC)
0

subzero961 Wrote:
Kahn was only used in 2 games. I agree with the posters about Shao Kahn being the strongest villian in MK. Shao Kahn should most definately make a comeback.
rest...dead.


Mk2, Mk3, MkU, MKTrilogy, and even in MKDA he was the “boss” for a short while.
I know that MkU and MkT were updated versions of Mk3, but STILL, Kahn was there, as a boss, again

It gets lame and boring.
Avatar
DanDaBrit
01/01/2004 10:13 PM (UTC)
0
wot if shao kahn was aware of the fact that the dragon king was coming and that it was inevitable?i mean remember this guy was the ruler of outerwold, as well as being powerful ur gona hav to be pretty damn smart to keep people like shang tsung and quan chi inline.No1 would trust those to,i doubt kahn would hav either.What if he knew wot they were plannin,that might explain why reiko receives kahn's helmut at the end of mk:gold.Being kahn's loyal servant he was willin to b the sacrafice,so instead of kahn being killed it was actually reiko.[obviously kahn was alot bigger than reiko,So some illusion was made to make reiko appear more like kahn:D]This would allow kahn to step back into the shadows and to prepare for what was comin,every1 would assume he is dead.But instead he is jus waiting for the right moment to strike down his enemies..and is actually playin tsung and quan chi like pawns.Mk 6 would centre around the dragon king.When u beat him its not over,but u do seriously weaken him...this is when a new more evil kahn could strike so mk7 would b a war between the dragon kings armies and kahn's.INstead of being a battle for earth its a battle for outerworld...which means all of the outerworld inhabitants would hav to chose sides,so all the warriors who had no reason to fight b4[as they didnt care if they earth was part of kahn's old empire] are drawn out and must go to war.
Avatar
BlindSite
01/01/2004 10:28 PM (UTC)
0
I would be better if it was an all out power struggle.

The Dragon King with his armies, Shao Kahn with his forces, the Edenians (because they know they won't be far behind after outworld is taken), Clans like the lin kuei, red and black dragon and Earths lot because of course it'll be a chance for them to do some damage as was mentioned before whilst their enemies are focused on each other. Plus the Dead Army that whomever took control (whichever story you wish to follw) could be in place.

All of these contingency's give people a chance to return. Kano, Mavado, Hsu Hao, Frost, Sub Zero, Cyrax, Sektor, smoke, noob saibot, Reiko, sonya blade, raiden, Jax and the list goes on not to mention all of the sub boss possibilites from either one of the forces. (I liked the idea of different bosses for different alignment).
Avatar
Born-Again-Vampire
Avatar
About Me

Anything war can do, peace can do better.
01/01/2004 11:08 PM (UTC)
0
Yeah I like that idea. I said in another force there should be more sides than good and evil.
Pages: 2
Discord
Twitch
Twitter
YouTube
Facebook
Privacy Policy
© 1998-2025 Shadow Knight Media, LLC. All rights reserved. Mortal Kombat, the dragon logo and all character names are trademarks and copyright of Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.