Should MK go with the SC stragedy?
3D Kombat Klassics
Pages: 1
Should MK go with the SC stragedy?
0
posted07/23/2008 04:00 PM (UTC)by

About Me
As Mr. Sloan always says, there is no "I" in team, but there is an "I" in pie. And there's an "I" in meat pie. Anagram of meat is team... I don't know what he's talking about.
Member Since
04/26/2004 07:44 PM (UTC)
Like have the 360 have 1 exclusive character,and the PS3 have 1? or have something that separates the 2? Your thought?
0
Would you want that?
I wouldnt have thought so.
& Besides it would piss a lot of people off, had their favourite character been on the other console, which they may not have.
It's already been confirmed there are no console exclusives.
I wouldnt have thought so.
& Besides it would piss a lot of people off, had their favourite character been on the other console, which they may not have.
It's already been confirmed there are no console exclusives.
About Me
Winter is Coming A Lanister always pays his debts You know nothing Jon Snow! We do not sow! Valar Morghulis
0
O God no. That's what they did wit Deception remember? The Gamecube was the only console that featured Shao Khan and Goro. Can you guess what console i had? Yeah the PS2. Bad idea man.
0
Hell no, I hate Namco's/SC's logic in that sensebecause it's not fair to have different characters on different consoles. They know different fans(especially of SW) will want to play as Vader or Yoda more then anythingBoon even admitted that in a few interviews month back or so, they don't want to put the fan in that position to decide "which version or get all versions"
I don't blame him, I would do the same. I believe SC is doing that for a few reasons. A. Help's out Sony and Xbox in that "Yoda for 360" while "Vader for PS3" B. putting SW characters to attract more fans since SC3 wasn't that great and had no exclusives, it was just for PS2
So, to answer the topic. No, I think Midway's doing it the right way, Namco the wrong way honestly. I don't like "exclusive character per console" at all...
I don't blame him, I would do the same. I believe SC is doing that for a few reasons. A. Help's out Sony and Xbox in that "Yoda for 360" while "Vader for PS3" B. putting SW characters to attract more fans since SC3 wasn't that great and had no exclusives, it was just for PS2
So, to answer the topic. No, I think Midway's doing it the right way, Namco the wrong way honestly. I don't like "exclusive character per console" at all...
0
No but I BET that they will release this game on Wii with 2 new characters...
Wanna see... We wiill
Wanna see... We wiill


About Me
Long Live Johnny Cage!!
0
To me it dont matter I have them all. I mean if one is to consider them self a gamer one should have them all. At least that what we do around here.
No its not a money thing its a sacrifice thing. Sacrifice on stuff to get other
stuff. Thats what its all about.
No its not a money thing its a sacrifice thing. Sacrifice on stuff to get other
stuff. Thats what its all about.
0
No..it's stupid..
No, it's just a scam to take 3 times more of your money. If they're going to the effort of extra characters why not let everyone have the opportunity to play them.
But seeing as it's been said there are no exclusives it doesn't really matter what we think.
But seeing as it's been said there are no exclusives it doesn't really matter what we think.
mkflegend Wrote:
Hell no, I hate Namco's/SC's logic in that sensebecause it's not fair to have different characters on different consoles. They know different fans(especially of SW) will want to play as Vader or Yoda more then anythingBoon even admitted that in a few interviews month back or so, they don't want to put the fan in that position to decide "which version or get all versions"
I don't blame him, I would do the same. I believe SC is doing that for a few reasons. A. Help's out Sony and Xbox in that "Yoda for 360" while "Vader for PS3" B. putting SW characters to attract more fans since SC3 wasn't that great and had no exclusives, it was just for PS2
So, to answer the topic. No, I think Midway's doing it the right way, Namco the wrong way honestly. I don't like "exclusive character per console" at all...
Hell no, I hate Namco's/SC's logic in that sensebecause it's not fair to have different characters on different consoles. They know different fans(especially of SW) will want to play as Vader or Yoda more then anythingBoon even admitted that in a few interviews month back or so, they don't want to put the fan in that position to decide "which version or get all versions"
I don't blame him, I would do the same. I believe SC is doing that for a few reasons. A. Help's out Sony and Xbox in that "Yoda for 360" while "Vader for PS3" B. putting SW characters to attract more fans since SC3 wasn't that great and had no exclusives, it was just for PS2
So, to answer the topic. No, I think Midway's doing it the right way, Namco the wrong way honestly. I don't like "exclusive character per console" at all...
I see your point, but Namco gets mad money that way.
I know some folks who actually bought both the Xbox and PS2 just to get both versions of SC2, and I'm willing to bet money they'll do it again. True fans go at it that way. I did it with MKTrilogy. Once I get my Wii, I'll do the same thing with Armageddon. It's the love of the game, and that's where the money comes in. It's a win-win, if you ask me.
Pages: 1
© 1998-2025 Shadow Knight Media, LLC. All rights reserved. Mortal Kombat, the dragon logo and all character names are trademarks and copyright of Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.