
0
I don't really care anymore, at first I was perplexed as to why men would want be with other men as opposed to being with a woman. But now I'm indifferent.
0
Indifferent/against.
I'll think nothing less of them, unless they start talking about something like who they find attractive in front of me, then they better keep their distance or I'll get very annoyed.
I'm fully against a child being brought into a gay couple's home. I believe a child needs both a father figure representative and a mother figure representative to turn out right. Nothing can replace a mother's caring love or a father's influence and guidance.
I'll think nothing less of them, unless they start talking about something like who they find attractive in front of me, then they better keep their distance or I'll get very annoyed.
I'm fully against a child being brought into a gay couple's home. I believe a child needs both a father figure representative and a mother figure representative to turn out right. Nothing can replace a mother's caring love or a father's influence and guidance.
Drifting_Ravage Wrote:
Indifferent/against.
I'll think nothing less of them, unless they start talking about something like who they find attractive in front of me, then they better keep their distance or I'll get very annoyed.
I'm fully against a child being brought into a gay couple's home. I believe a child needs both a father figure representative and a mother figure representative to turn out right. Nothing can replace a mother's caring love or a father's influence and guidance.
Indifferent/against.
I'll think nothing less of them, unless they start talking about something like who they find attractive in front of me, then they better keep their distance or I'll get very annoyed.
I'm fully against a child being brought into a gay couple's home. I believe a child needs both a father figure representative and a mother figure representative to turn out right. Nothing can replace a mother's caring love or a father's influence and guidance.
How do you feel about single parents?
Personally, i think 2 things about it
1) I firmly believe it is a natural occurance. It has been noted to take place in the animal kingdom, so i'm pretty sure it has nothing to do with concious control.
2) I don't see any problem with it. Telling someone they can't love someone because of a stipulation is wrong. Let people be with who they want to be with, and let them love each other. Let them be happy.
I don't think any of us have any right to tell someone they can't love a certain type of person. The one thing in the world that binds us together is the one thing people keep trying to tear apart, for whatever inane reason.

0
I'm staunchly against it, with either sex.
To me it's not natural, male and female anatomy is designed to work together, and that's that, case closed. You cannot argue with that, you cannot go against biology.
To me it's not natural, male and female anatomy is designed to work together, and that's that, case closed. You cannot argue with that, you cannot go against biology.
I always hate this question. I feel like it's a lose-lose situation for me, but I don't back away from my beliefs and morality.
I'm against homosexuality for a myriad of reasons. I always feel like a bad guy when I say that, and think that's exactly the reaction those for it want. But, to me, it's just not right. I'm reluctant to use my religion, since people tend to scoff and call me a biggot just for that alone, but it is against my Christian beliefs. Beyond that, though, I believe it is social unnatural. Those who support it always use the example that I have no right to restrict someone else for loving another, regardless of gender. I will agree with that. People will do whatever the heck they want regardless of what I believe or say. But my standards don't change. The world's standards do. Fifty years ago, homosexuality would never have been so proudly promoted because society dictated it was wrong. Now they dictate that it is all right. But just because society says it's right, does that make it right? There has to be a transcendent standard, and that's what I follow. According to that same logic, is it then already for two people who deeply love each other, but are blood-related, to have an incestuous relationship? Society still dictates that that is wrong, but will it always be that way? I don't let my standards change. I'm not against homosexuals, just their life-styles. I can disapprove without condemnation. People are given free-will and can use it however they see fit, but I don't think it's right. That doesn't make me any better or any worse than someone with a contrary opinion, but, in the end, someone has to be right: it is either wrong or right.
I'm against homosexuality for a myriad of reasons. I always feel like a bad guy when I say that, and think that's exactly the reaction those for it want. But, to me, it's just not right. I'm reluctant to use my religion, since people tend to scoff and call me a biggot just for that alone, but it is against my Christian beliefs. Beyond that, though, I believe it is social unnatural. Those who support it always use the example that I have no right to restrict someone else for loving another, regardless of gender. I will agree with that. People will do whatever the heck they want regardless of what I believe or say. But my standards don't change. The world's standards do. Fifty years ago, homosexuality would never have been so proudly promoted because society dictated it was wrong. Now they dictate that it is all right. But just because society says it's right, does that make it right? There has to be a transcendent standard, and that's what I follow. According to that same logic, is it then already for two people who deeply love each other, but are blood-related, to have an incestuous relationship? Society still dictates that that is wrong, but will it always be that way? I don't let my standards change. I'm not against homosexuals, just their life-styles. I can disapprove without condemnation. People are given free-will and can use it however they see fit, but I don't think it's right. That doesn't make me any better or any worse than someone with a contrary opinion, but, in the end, someone has to be right: it is either wrong or right.
Does it matter? We're all human beings with emotions and feelings. We eat, we sleep, we talk, we think, we play video games just like everybody elses in this world. Just because some people like different gender (or in this case, the same gender) doesnt mean we all have to treat each other differently. Nothing more and nothing less.
About Me

0
Libra Wrote:
Does it matter? We're all human beings with emotions and feelings. We eat, we sleep, we talk, we think, we play video games just like everybody elses in this world. Just because some people like different gender (or in this case, the same gender) doesnt mean we all have to treat each other differently. Nothing more and nothing less.
Sorry, but in a way that's false. Handicapped kids are treated specialy, and not everyone plays video games. Does it matter? We're all human beings with emotions and feelings. We eat, we sleep, we talk, we think, we play video games just like everybody elses in this world. Just because some people like different gender (or in this case, the same gender) doesnt mean we all have to treat each other differently. Nothing more and nothing less.
Doesn't have anything to do with the thread, but just saying
SubMan799 Wrote:
Doesn't have anything to do with the thread, but just saying
Libra Wrote:
Does it matter? We're all human beings with emotions and feelings. We eat, we sleep, we talk, we think, we play video games just like everybody elses in this world. Just because some people like different gender (or in this case, the same gender) doesnt mean we all have to treat each other differently. Nothing more and nothing less.
Sorry, but in a way that's false. Handicapped kids are treated specialy, and not everyone plays video games. Does it matter? We're all human beings with emotions and feelings. We eat, we sleep, we talk, we think, we play video games just like everybody elses in this world. Just because some people like different gender (or in this case, the same gender) doesnt mean we all have to treat each other differently. Nothing more and nothing less.
Doesn't have anything to do with the thread, but just saying
Oh but it does belong to this thread. There is a lot of people who treat homosexuality differently because of their beliefs or their views on them. A lot of people treat homosexuality like is some kind of disease.
There are many people out there who takes great length to show how much they dislike homosexuality by beating them up or even killing them (like Mathew Shepard for example). Why do you want to hurt someone because they like sombody who happens to be the same gender as the person? We're human beings, we shouldnt be treated differently because of our sexual preferences.
In the past, i read an article about a high school graduate, who was beaten to death by a metal baseball bat, been cut in multiple places by a knife and been shot about 14 times because he was gay. Again, why did the killer have to kill someone because he was gay? A person shouldnt be treated like that. Such a hateful world we live in. We all should be treated equally as human beings and not by our preferences or beliefs.
About Me

0
Libra Wrote:
Oh but it does belong to this thread. There is a lot of people who treat homosexuality differently because of their beliefs or their views on them. A lot of people treat homosexuality like is some kind of disease.
There are many people out there who takes great length to show how much they dislike homosexuality by beating them up or even killing them (like Mathew Shepard for example). Why do you want to hurt someone because they like sombody who happens to be the same gender as the person? We're human beings, we shouldnt be treated differently because of our sexual preferences.
In the past, i read an article about a high school graduate, who was beaten to death by a metal baseball bat, been cut in multiple places by a knife and been shot about 14 times because he was gay. Again, why did he have to kill someone because he was gay? Such a hateful world we live in. We all should be treated equally as human beings and not by our preferences or beliefs.
SubMan799 Wrote:
Doesn't have anything to do with the thread, but just saying
Libra Wrote:
Does it matter? We're all human beings with emotions and feelings. We eat, we sleep, we talk, we think, we play video games just like everybody elses in this world. Just because some people like different gender (or in this case, the same gender) doesnt mean we all have to treat each other differently. Nothing more and nothing less.
Sorry, but in a way that's false. Handicapped kids are treated specialy, and not everyone plays video games. Does it matter? We're all human beings with emotions and feelings. We eat, we sleep, we talk, we think, we play video games just like everybody elses in this world. Just because some people like different gender (or in this case, the same gender) doesnt mean we all have to treat each other differently. Nothing more and nothing less.
Doesn't have anything to do with the thread, but just saying
Oh but it does belong to this thread. There is a lot of people who treat homosexuality differently because of their beliefs or their views on them. A lot of people treat homosexuality like is some kind of disease.
There are many people out there who takes great length to show how much they dislike homosexuality by beating them up or even killing them (like Mathew Shepard for example). Why do you want to hurt someone because they like sombody who happens to be the same gender as the person? We're human beings, we shouldnt be treated differently because of our sexual preferences.
In the past, i read an article about a high school graduate, who was beaten to death by a metal baseball bat, been cut in multiple places by a knife and been shot about 14 times because he was gay. Again, why did he have to kill someone because he was gay? Such a hateful world we live in. We all should be treated equally as human beings and not by our preferences or beliefs.
okay, you can be against gay,and do that stupid protest thing, but wtf?
A guy came to our school a few weeks ago who was against racism, and hating. He told us about what people do because of what they beleive in. He also told us where the word fag originated. I was in shock. (Healso told us what the Washington Redskins were, but that's a different story)
I'll admit I'm against it, but this stuff just freaks me out

0
Yea i dont really care about it unless it is around or conducted near me.
Garlador Wrote:
I always hate this question. I feel like it's a lose-lose situation for me, but I don't back away from my beliefs and morality.
I'm against homosexuality for a myriad of reasons. I always feel like a bad guy when I say that, and think that's exactly the reaction those for it want. But, to me, it's just not right. I'm reluctant to use my religion, since people tend to scoff and call me a biggot just for that alone, but it is against my Christian beliefs. Beyond that, though, I believe it is social unnatural. Those who support it always use the example that I have no right to restrict someone else for loving another, regardless of gender. I will agree with that. People will do whatever the heck they want regardless of what I believe or say. But my standards don't change. The world's standards do. Fifty years ago, homosexuality would never have been so proudly promoted because society dictated it was wrong. Now they dictate that it is all right. But just because society says it's right, does that make it right? There has to be a transcendent standard, and that's what I follow. According to that same logic, is it then already for two people who deeply love each other, but are blood-related, to have an incestuous relationship? Society still dictates that that is wrong, but will it always be that way? I don't let my standards change. I'm not against homosexuals, just their life-styles. I can disapprove without condemnation. People are given free-will and can use it however they see fit, but I don't think it's right. That doesn't make me any better or any worse than someone with a contrary opinion, but, in the end, someone has to be right: it is either wrong or right.
society dictated it was wrong when 2 folks of different back rounds, color, race and religion dated.. dont compare two siblings to two lovers. I always hate this question. I feel like it's a lose-lose situation for me, but I don't back away from my beliefs and morality.
I'm against homosexuality for a myriad of reasons. I always feel like a bad guy when I say that, and think that's exactly the reaction those for it want. But, to me, it's just not right. I'm reluctant to use my religion, since people tend to scoff and call me a biggot just for that alone, but it is against my Christian beliefs. Beyond that, though, I believe it is social unnatural. Those who support it always use the example that I have no right to restrict someone else for loving another, regardless of gender. I will agree with that. People will do whatever the heck they want regardless of what I believe or say. But my standards don't change. The world's standards do. Fifty years ago, homosexuality would never have been so proudly promoted because society dictated it was wrong. Now they dictate that it is all right. But just because society says it's right, does that make it right? There has to be a transcendent standard, and that's what I follow. According to that same logic, is it then already for two people who deeply love each other, but are blood-related, to have an incestuous relationship? Society still dictates that that is wrong, but will it always be that way? I don't let my standards change. I'm not against homosexuals, just their life-styles. I can disapprove without condemnation. People are given free-will and can use it however they see fit, but I don't think it's right. That doesn't make me any better or any worse than someone with a contrary opinion, but, in the end, someone has to be right: it is either wrong or right.
just like in the past i wish you'd never post in these topics because you are the biggest moron of them all.
do you folks need me to explain X & Y chromosome again??
About Me

0
ShingoEX Wrote:
You lost credibility once you threw in the word "moron".
We can do without crap like that in these kinds of discussion.
You lost credibility once you threw in the word "moron".
We can do without crap like that in these kinds of discussion.
Agreed.


About Me
0
I am not against homosexuals. However, I consider gay sex like a sin, but I don't consider myself worthy of judging anyone anyway. I got no gay friends (at least that I know of) except people I met on MKO. They're great friends, and if they prefer cocks then that's their business.
A child being raised by two parents of the same sex is wrong imo, that it be two men or two lesbians.
~Quoted for truth~
Keith Wrote:
But if his/her parents loved him/her wouldn't that be all that mattered.
But if his/her parents loved him/her wouldn't that be all that mattered.
A child being raised by two parents of the same sex is wrong imo, that it be two men or two lesbians.
~Quoted for truth~
Chrome Wrote:
I perceive it as sin, but that doesn't make you more or less in my eyes. We are all detined to sin, and there is no measure between sins.
I perceive it as sin, but that doesn't make you more or less in my eyes. We are all detined to sin, and there is no measure between sins.
ReptilianHelms Wrote:
People only consider being gay unnatural, because of the gay people making a huge song and dance about it being "different" to others.
People only consider being gay unnatural, because of the gay people making a huge song and dance about it being "different" to others.
Keith Wrote:
People these days are too focused on sexuality.
People these days are too focused on sexuality.
Blade-Tsung Wrote:
(Hot) Lesbians make my world go 'round.
(Hot) Lesbians make my world go 'round.
ShingoEX Wrote:
You lost credibility once you threw in the word "moron".
We can do without crap like that in these kinds of discussion.
who said i had credibility? You lost credibility once you threw in the word "moron".
We can do without crap like that in these kinds of discussion.
you really should read a bunch of his posts from the past on this subject.
krsx66 Wrote:
I'm staunchly against it, with either sex.
To me it's not natural, male and female anatomy is designed to work together, and that's that, case closed. You cannot argue with that, you cannot go against biology.
I'm staunchly against it, with either sex.
To me it's not natural, male and female anatomy is designed to work together, and that's that, case closed. You cannot argue with that, you cannot go against biology.
The problem with your argument is that supposedly, homosexuality is caused by a "mixup" of sorts on a biological level...a naturally-occuring biological level.
danadbab Wrote:
you really should read a bunch of his posts from the past on this subject.
ShingoEX Wrote:
You lost credibility once you threw in the word "moron".
We can do without crap like that in these kinds of discussion.
who said i had credibility? You lost credibility once you threw in the word "moron".
We can do without crap like that in these kinds of discussion.
you really should read a bunch of his posts from the past on this subject.
I won't, as those posts have nothing to do with this one, and I'd rather like to keep this discussion going without the (unnecessary) insults...
0
i dont really care, people are allowed to love/like who ever the fuck they want to. It has zero bearing on my life.
It is the few idiots who think gay people loving each other has in some way adversely affected their lives who cause 99.9 % of the problems in this given situation.
Years ago it was wrong for people of two ethnic origins to be in love, now they've moved on to say the same for homosexual couples. The idiots always need a scapegoat.
It is the few idiots who think gay people loving each other has in some way adversely affected their lives who cause 99.9 % of the problems in this given situation.
Years ago it was wrong for people of two ethnic origins to be in love, now they've moved on to say the same for homosexual couples. The idiots always need a scapegoat.
0
krsx66 Wrote:
I'm staunchly against it, with either sex.
To me it's not natural, male and female anatomy is designed to work together, and that's that, case closed. You cannot argue with that, you cannot go against biology.
I'm staunchly against it, with either sex.
To me it's not natural, male and female anatomy is designed to work together, and that's that, case closed. You cannot argue with that, you cannot go against biology.
Garlador Wrote:
I always hate this question. I feel like it's a lose-lose situation for me, but I don't back away from my beliefs and morality.
I'm against homosexuality for a myriad of reasons. I always feel like a bad guy when I say that, and think that's exactly the reaction those for it want. But, to me, it's just not right. I'm reluctant to use my religion, since people tend to scoff and call me a biggot just for that alone, but it is against my Christian beliefs. Beyond that, though, I believe it is social unnatural. Those who support it always use the example that I have no right to restrict someone else for loving another, regardless of gender. I will agree with that. People will do whatever the heck they want regardless of what I believe or say. But my standards don't change. The world's standards do. Fifty years ago, homosexuality would never have been so proudly promoted because society dictated it was wrong. Now they dictate that it is all right. But just because society says it's right, does that make it right? There has to be a transcendent standard, and that's what I follow. According to that same logic, is it then already for two people who deeply love each other, but are blood-related, to have an incestuous relationship? Society still dictates that that is wrong, but will it always be that way? I don't let my standards change. I'm not against homosexuals, just their life-styles. I can disapprove without condemnation. People are given free-will and can use it however they see fit, but I don't think it's right. That doesn't make me any better or any worse than someone with a contrary opinion, but, in the end, someone has to be right: it is either wrong or right.
I always hate this question. I feel like it's a lose-lose situation for me, but I don't back away from my beliefs and morality.
I'm against homosexuality for a myriad of reasons. I always feel like a bad guy when I say that, and think that's exactly the reaction those for it want. But, to me, it's just not right. I'm reluctant to use my religion, since people tend to scoff and call me a biggot just for that alone, but it is against my Christian beliefs. Beyond that, though, I believe it is social unnatural. Those who support it always use the example that I have no right to restrict someone else for loving another, regardless of gender. I will agree with that. People will do whatever the heck they want regardless of what I believe or say. But my standards don't change. The world's standards do. Fifty years ago, homosexuality would never have been so proudly promoted because society dictated it was wrong. Now they dictate that it is all right. But just because society says it's right, does that make it right? There has to be a transcendent standard, and that's what I follow. According to that same logic, is it then already for two people who deeply love each other, but are blood-related, to have an incestuous relationship? Society still dictates that that is wrong, but will it always be that way? I don't let my standards change. I'm not against homosexuals, just their life-styles. I can disapprove without condemnation. People are given free-will and can use it however they see fit, but I don't think it's right. That doesn't make me any better or any worse than someone with a contrary opinion, but, in the end, someone has to be right: it is either wrong or right.
everything I've been trying to say, just re-worded.
got the mod(s) ready to pounce anytime I feel the need to defend myself from the many instigators, antagonists, and genuine morons, yet this bickering goes unscathed. partisan in every way.
ShingoEX Wrote:
The problem with your argument is that supposedly, homosexuality is caused by a "mixup" of sorts on a biological level...a naturally-occuring biological level.
krsx66 Wrote:
I'm staunchly against it, with either sex.
To me it's not natural, male and female anatomy is designed to work together, and that's that, case closed. You cannot argue with that, you cannot go against biology.
I'm staunchly against it, with either sex.
To me it's not natural, male and female anatomy is designed to work together, and that's that, case closed. You cannot argue with that, you cannot go against biology.
The problem with your argument is that supposedly, homosexuality is caused by a "mixup" of sorts on a biological level...a naturally-occuring biological level.
What do you mean "supposedly"? In layman's terms, and pardon my French, you can't copulate with two penises or vaginas. Unless you care to argue that.
ShingoEX Wrote:
I won't, as those posts have nothing to do with this one, and I'd rather like to keep this discussion going without the (unnecessary) insults...
well i am truly sorry you had to read that. im being 100% for real. sorry danadbab Wrote:
you really should read a bunch of his posts from the past on this subject.
ShingoEX Wrote:
You lost credibility once you threw in the word "moron".
We can do without crap like that in these kinds of discussion.
who said i had credibility? You lost credibility once you threw in the word "moron".
We can do without crap like that in these kinds of discussion.
you really should read a bunch of his posts from the past on this subject.
I won't, as those posts have nothing to do with this one, and I'd rather like to keep this discussion going without the (unnecessary) insults...
I support it. Without getting too deep into my personal belief structure, which is, let us say, complex, I don't believe that inherent biology is necessarily an obstacle that should stand in the way of preference.
We prefer what we perceive as beneficial to us, necessary for our personal survival or well-being. Some amphibians, as I recall, can change their gender. Scientifically, sexually isn't necessarily forced on the innate gender in that regard. Now, I realize what's sauce for the goose isn't necessarily sauce for the gander (we can't switch genitals - yet), but it's rather the principle of the thing that I focus on.
I do, however, have an issue with gay adoption. Not that I find it an aberrant in any way, but simply because the adopted child will inevitably end up facing persecution for it. The world simply isn't ready for it, yet. Give it time to adjust.
A note: I applaud the (relative) maturity which has been presented in this topic to date!
We prefer what we perceive as beneficial to us, necessary for our personal survival or well-being. Some amphibians, as I recall, can change their gender. Scientifically, sexually isn't necessarily forced on the innate gender in that regard. Now, I realize what's sauce for the goose isn't necessarily sauce for the gander (we can't switch genitals - yet), but it's rather the principle of the thing that I focus on.
I do, however, have an issue with gay adoption. Not that I find it an aberrant in any way, but simply because the adopted child will inevitably end up facing persecution for it. The world simply isn't ready for it, yet. Give it time to adjust.
A note: I applaud the (relative) maturity which has been presented in this topic to date!
© 1998-2025 Shadow Knight Media, LLC. All rights reserved. Mortal Kombat, the dragon logo and all character names are trademarks and copyright of Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.