

About Me
0
FlamingTP Wrote:
ok now this is genuinely funny, please please tell me you are joking. there's gotta be a trollface hidden in that post somewhere.
m0s3pH Wrote:
... except that Battlefield also can't hold a candle to Halo.
FlamingTP Wrote:
Best website EVER!
Best website EVER!
... except that Battlefield also can't hold a candle to Halo.
ok now this is genuinely funny, please please tell me you are joking. there's gotta be a trollface hidden in that post somewhere.
Battlefield is a terrible piece of shit series. Sorry to break it to you but it is the truth.
Modern Warfare may have it's share of issues but each game is more entertaining than Battlefield a.k.a the FPS for this generations consoles yet it uses Sega Dreamcast graphics and has one of the worst storylines ever.
Halo was fine until the pile of shit known as Halo: Reach came out. I hope that the AE of Halo CE will be better than Reach but then again..... it can't be worse.


About Me
Shao Kahn did nothing wrong
0
TheNinjasRock071394 Wrote:
Battlefield is a terrible piece of shit series. Sorry to break it to you but it is the truth.
Modern Warfare may have it's share of issues but each game is more entertaining than Battlefield a.k.a the FPS for this generations consoles yet it uses Sega Dreamcast graphics and has one of the worst storylines ever.
Halo was fine until the pile of shit known as Halo: Reach came out. I hope that the AE of Halo CE will be better than Reach but then again..... it can't be worse.
FlamingTP Wrote:
ok now this is genuinely funny, please please tell me you are joking. there's gotta be a trollface hidden in that post somewhere.
m0s3pH Wrote:
... except that Battlefield also can't hold a candle to Halo.
FlamingTP Wrote:
Best website EVER!
Best website EVER!
... except that Battlefield also can't hold a candle to Halo.
ok now this is genuinely funny, please please tell me you are joking. there's gotta be a trollface hidden in that post somewhere.
Battlefield is a terrible piece of shit series. Sorry to break it to you but it is the truth.
Modern Warfare may have it's share of issues but each game is more entertaining than Battlefield a.k.a the FPS for this generations consoles yet it uses Sega Dreamcast graphics and has one of the worst storylines ever.
Halo was fine until the pile of shit known as Halo: Reach came out. I hope that the AE of Halo CE will be better than Reach but then again..... it can't be worse.
If anything it goes BF>Halo>any other game>COD.
At the end of the day though, the best FPS game will always be Turok 2: Seeds of Evil in my book.


0
I can'tt find a site that streams 1 Girl 5 Gays...
):
):


About Me
0
[Killswitch] Wrote:
If anything it goes BF>Halo>any other game>COD.
At the end of the day though, the best FPS game will always be Turok 2: Seeds of Evil in my book.
TheNinjasRock071394 Wrote:
Battlefield is a terrible piece of shit series. Sorry to break it to you but it is the truth.
Modern Warfare may have it's share of issues but each game is more entertaining than Battlefield a.k.a the FPS for this generations consoles yet it uses Sega Dreamcast graphics and has one of the worst storylines ever.
Halo was fine until the pile of shit known as Halo: Reach came out. I hope that the AE of Halo CE will be better than Reach but then again..... it can't be worse.
FlamingTP Wrote:
ok now this is genuinely funny, please please tell me you are joking. there's gotta be a trollface hidden in that post somewhere.
m0s3pH Wrote:
... except that Battlefield also can't hold a candle to Halo.
FlamingTP Wrote:
Best website EVER!
Best website EVER!
... except that Battlefield also can't hold a candle to Halo.
ok now this is genuinely funny, please please tell me you are joking. there's gotta be a trollface hidden in that post somewhere.
Battlefield is a terrible piece of shit series. Sorry to break it to you but it is the truth.
Modern Warfare may have it's share of issues but each game is more entertaining than Battlefield a.k.a the FPS for this generations consoles yet it uses Sega Dreamcast graphics and has one of the worst storylines ever.
Halo was fine until the pile of shit known as Halo: Reach came out. I hope that the AE of Halo CE will be better than Reach but then again..... it can't be worse.
If anything it goes BF>Halo>any other game>COD.
At the end of the day though, the best FPS game will always be Turok 2: Seeds of Evil in my book.
No Way, In terms of Games that are out now for each series it goes like this, in terms of entertainment not shit that MLG fucktards would claim good because as proven in Halo.... all of their gametypes suck.
Halo 2 > MW > MW2 > Halo 3 > Halo CE > Halo Wars > Black Ops > COD 2 > World At War > Cod 3 > All BattleField Games.
Got bored yesterday and soft-modded my Wii. A lot more difficult to get back-ups running than I thought it would be!
I've done this sort of thing before, but never with a wii. I've never seen so many tutorials that do the exact same thing, but with completely different steps before. There's like 80 different methods to doing ANYTHING, but the end result is always the same. Not to mention the Wii soft-modding community are all pushing their own favourite ways of doing things. It's hard for one to learn what to do with so many different ideas flying around.
Regardless, soft-mod was successful, and back-ups work now.
I've done this sort of thing before, but never with a wii. I've never seen so many tutorials that do the exact same thing, but with completely different steps before. There's like 80 different methods to doing ANYTHING, but the end result is always the same. Not to mention the Wii soft-modding community are all pushing their own favourite ways of doing things. It's hard for one to learn what to do with so many different ideas flying around.
Regardless, soft-mod was successful, and back-ups work now.


About Me

0
TheNinjasRock071394 Wrote:
Modern Warfare may have it's share of issues but each game is more entertaining than Battlefield a.k.a the FPS for this generations consoles yet it uses Sega Dreamcast graphics and has one of the worst storylines ever.
Modern Warfare may have it's share of issues but each game is more entertaining than Battlefield a.k.a the FPS for this generations consoles yet it uses Sega Dreamcast graphics and has one of the worst storylines ever.
Storyline and graphics are about the least important things in a shooter.
And you're implying that Battlefield 3 looks bad? wat
Chimera Wrote:
Whatever I did in one barely altered the story in two. Hopefully leaving the rachni to live will help fight the reapers. Cant wait either
My decisions made my story in 2 a hell of a lot different than my brother's. He killed Wrex, so the Grunt loyalty mission was different for him. Also, I chose Udina over Anderson. I hoped he'd step up to the plate and be less of an ass; I was wrong. So I never got my Spectre status back; my brother did because he chose Anderson, but we both let the Council die. TheNinjasRock071394 Wrote:
Mass Effect 2 was so much better than the first one. I personally can't wait for the third game to come out.
[Killswitch] Wrote:
Bleh. I don't care much for the Mass Effect series. The gameplay doesn't interest me.
Chimera Wrote:
Finished Mass Effect 2. I didn't see anything wrong with it. I just miss the elevator conversations.
Finished Mass Effect 2. I didn't see anything wrong with it. I just miss the elevator conversations.
Bleh. I don't care much for the Mass Effect series. The gameplay doesn't interest me.
Mass Effect 2 was so much better than the first one. I personally can't wait for the third game to come out.
Whatever I did in one barely altered the story in two. Hopefully leaving the rachni to live will help fight the reapers. Cant wait either
[Killswitch] Wrote:At the end of the day though, the best FPS game will always be Turok 2: Seeds of Evil in my book.
Haha I miss that game. I remember a multiplayer map called Fish in a Barrel.
So much fun. And another mode, like monkey mode or something!


About Me
0
Ninja_Mime Wrote:
Storyline and graphics are about the least important things in a shooter.
And you're implying that Battlefield 3 looks bad? wat
TheNinjasRock071394 Wrote:
Modern Warfare may have it's share of issues but each game is more entertaining than Battlefield a.k.a the FPS for this generations consoles yet it uses Sega Dreamcast graphics and has one of the worst storylines ever.
Modern Warfare may have it's share of issues but each game is more entertaining than Battlefield a.k.a the FPS for this generations consoles yet it uses Sega Dreamcast graphics and has one of the worst storylines ever.
Storyline and graphics are about the least important things in a shooter.
And you're implying that Battlefield 3 looks bad? wat
The gameplay graphics of Battlefield are always shitty. I know that Storyline and Graphics aren't that important when it comes to shooters but MW has those while BF lacks them and since we are comparing the two... it is pretty valid.
Modern Warfare games may have everything being overpowered but it is a game and not real life so let it be as fictional in that sense as it wants. If you want everything to be on an extreme level of realism go join the damn military. The gameplay of the Modern Warfare games are pretty damn entertaining, even when I was first getting used to it back in the days of COD4 and I wasn't that good.
The only way BF can ever be fun is if you play with a select few people that you know because that game is so team based. I am not saying that team based games suck (with the exception of battlefield) but it is ridiculous that the game is so team based that I can't play with randoms due to how ignorant the online community is. In COD I can at least play with people I know and we can kick ass together or I can go into a game of anything and Kick Ass alone against a team.
Don't even get me started on the shitty tank vehicle use from World at War, COD3, and Bad Company 2....
TheNinjasRock071394 Wrote:
The gameplay graphics of Battlefield are always shitty. I know that Storyline and Graphics aren't that important when it comes to shooters but MW has those while BF lacks them and since we are comparing the two... it is pretty valid.
Modern Warfare games may have everything being overpowered but it is a game and not real life so let it be as fictional in that sense as it wants. If you want everything to be on an extreme level of realism go join the damn military. The gameplay of the Modern Warfare games are pretty damn entertaining, even when I was first getting used to it back in the days of COD4 and I wasn't that good.
The only way BF can ever be fun is if you play with a select few people that you know because that game is so team based. I am not saying that team based games suck (with the exception of battlefield) but it is ridiculous that the game is so team based that I can't play with randoms due to how ignorant the online community is. In COD I can at least play with people I know and we can kick ass together or I can go into a game of anything and Kick Ass alone against a team.
Don't even get me started on the shitty tank vehicle use from World at War, COD3, and Bad Company 2....
Ninja_Mime Wrote:
Storyline and graphics are about the least important things in a shooter.
And you're implying that Battlefield 3 looks bad? wat
TheNinjasRock071394 Wrote:
Modern Warfare may have it's share of issues but each game is more entertaining than Battlefield a.k.a the FPS for this generations consoles yet it uses Sega Dreamcast graphics and has one of the worst storylines ever.
Modern Warfare may have it's share of issues but each game is more entertaining than Battlefield a.k.a the FPS for this generations consoles yet it uses Sega Dreamcast graphics and has one of the worst storylines ever.
Storyline and graphics are about the least important things in a shooter.
And you're implying that Battlefield 3 looks bad? wat
The gameplay graphics of Battlefield are always shitty. I know that Storyline and Graphics aren't that important when it comes to shooters but MW has those while BF lacks them and since we are comparing the two... it is pretty valid.
Modern Warfare games may have everything being overpowered but it is a game and not real life so let it be as fictional in that sense as it wants. If you want everything to be on an extreme level of realism go join the damn military. The gameplay of the Modern Warfare games are pretty damn entertaining, even when I was first getting used to it back in the days of COD4 and I wasn't that good.
The only way BF can ever be fun is if you play with a select few people that you know because that game is so team based. I am not saying that team based games suck (with the exception of battlefield) but it is ridiculous that the game is so team based that I can't play with randoms due to how ignorant the online community is. In COD I can at least play with people I know and we can kick ass together or I can go into a game of anything and Kick Ass alone against a team.
Don't even get me started on the shitty tank vehicle use from World at War, COD3, and Bad Company 2....
Bro, I'm not arguing your other points, but look at gameplay for Battlefield 3. The graphics outdo any Call of Duty game by a long shot.


About Me
Shao Kahn did nothing wrong
0
NS922 Wrote:
Turok: Evolution is my personal fave. I used to play it every day on me PS2 as a young lad.
[Killswitch] Wrote:
At the end of the day though, the best FPS game will always be Turok 2: Seeds of Evil in my book.
At the end of the day though, the best FPS game will always be Turok 2: Seeds of Evil in my book.
Turok: Evolution is my personal fave. I used to play it every day on me PS2 as a young lad.
That's a fun one too. Multiplayer on that game is so entertaining.
About Me

0
Three pages down, two to go on my Martin Luther Research Paper. Almost there.


About Me
0
What a bad day. USA lost world cup),: good game though. And my cardz lost

0
Looking forward to a pita with falafel, tzatziki, and baba ghannouj for dinner.
Tried to play MK: Armageddon again but was dumbstruck by the terrible controls....
Tried to play MK: Armageddon again but was dumbstruck by the terrible controls....


About Me
0
dibula Wrote:
Bro, I'm not arguing your other points, but look at gameplay for Battlefield 3. The graphics outdo any Call of Duty game by a long shot.
TheNinjasRock071394 Wrote:
The gameplay graphics of Battlefield are always shitty. I know that Storyline and Graphics aren't that important when it comes to shooters but MW has those while BF lacks them and since we are comparing the two... it is pretty valid.
Modern Warfare games may have everything being overpowered but it is a game and not real life so let it be as fictional in that sense as it wants. If you want everything to be on an extreme level of realism go join the damn military. The gameplay of the Modern Warfare games are pretty damn entertaining, even when I was first getting used to it back in the days of COD4 and I wasn't that good.
The only way BF can ever be fun is if you play with a select few people that you know because that game is so team based. I am not saying that team based games suck (with the exception of battlefield) but it is ridiculous that the game is so team based that I can't play with randoms due to how ignorant the online community is. In COD I can at least play with people I know and we can kick ass together or I can go into a game of anything and Kick Ass alone against a team.
Don't even get me started on the shitty tank vehicle use from World at War, COD3, and Bad Company 2....
Ninja_Mime Wrote:
Storyline and graphics are about the least important things in a shooter.
And you're implying that Battlefield 3 looks bad? wat
TheNinjasRock071394 Wrote:
Modern Warfare may have it's share of issues but each game is more entertaining than Battlefield a.k.a the FPS for this generations consoles yet it uses Sega Dreamcast graphics and has one of the worst storylines ever.
Modern Warfare may have it's share of issues but each game is more entertaining than Battlefield a.k.a the FPS for this generations consoles yet it uses Sega Dreamcast graphics and has one of the worst storylines ever.
Storyline and graphics are about the least important things in a shooter.
And you're implying that Battlefield 3 looks bad? wat
The gameplay graphics of Battlefield are always shitty. I know that Storyline and Graphics aren't that important when it comes to shooters but MW has those while BF lacks them and since we are comparing the two... it is pretty valid.
Modern Warfare games may have everything being overpowered but it is a game and not real life so let it be as fictional in that sense as it wants. If you want everything to be on an extreme level of realism go join the damn military. The gameplay of the Modern Warfare games are pretty damn entertaining, even when I was first getting used to it back in the days of COD4 and I wasn't that good.
The only way BF can ever be fun is if you play with a select few people that you know because that game is so team based. I am not saying that team based games suck (with the exception of battlefield) but it is ridiculous that the game is so team based that I can't play with randoms due to how ignorant the online community is. In COD I can at least play with people I know and we can kick ass together or I can go into a game of anything and Kick Ass alone against a team.
Don't even get me started on the shitty tank vehicle use from World at War, COD3, and Bad Company 2....
Bro, I'm not arguing your other points, but look at gameplay for Battlefield 3. The graphics outdo any Call of Duty game by a long shot.
Okay.. I watched the E3 video again just now. The only thing I would say is better graphic wise is the smoke and dust clouds that appear on the screen. Other than that I don't see much of anything that is better. I really can't compare a tank to MW games.

0
SubMan799 Wrote:
Three pages down, two to go on my Martin Luther Research Paper. Almost there.
Three pages down, two to go on my Martin Luther Research Paper. Almost there.
Stir up some shit and talk about reparations, lol.
About Me

0
StatueofLiberty Wrote:
Stir up some shit and talk about reparations, lol.
SubMan799 Wrote:
Three pages down, two to go on my Martin Luther Research Paper. Almost there.
Three pages down, two to go on my Martin Luther Research Paper. Almost there.
Stir up some shit and talk about reparations, lol.
Sadly the paper is on Luther the reformer, not Luther King
0
Stage collapsed on Cheap Trick at Ottawa's Bluesfest so the rest of the festival was cancelled. Joe Satriani was on right after them too

0

Go on, Drink Dr. Bob.
Drink all of Dr. Bob.
Open wide say "Ahhh"


About Me
Mortal Kombat Online - Community Manager
| Twitch | YouTube | Lawful Chaos |
Signature and avatar by ThePredator151
0
Battlefield and CoD both have shit graphics. BF2 looked like a damn N64 game for fuck's sake. MW2 even looked last-gen on my HD setup. Halo has consistently looked better than any shooter out there in every iteration of the series.
Now to gameplay. I don't play BF so I can't attest to any of its balancing, design, or whatever, so I'm going to leave that alone. I'm only going to compare CoD and Halo. Games in question will be every Halo FPS not named ODST, CoD4, MW2, and BO.
If I want solid weapon balancing:
H3 > CoD4 > H2 > H:CE > MW2 > H:R > BO
If I want great maps:
H2 is the best and no other game comes close. If you want the breakdown after that, it's:
H3 > H:CE > CoD4 > BO > H:R >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MW2
If I want fun gametypes:
Any Halo > Any CoD. However:
H3 > H:R > H:CE. CoD gametypes have been the same throughout, so there's no rating scale. They're shitty in every game. (S&D is fun though... if I want to play Counter-Strike and not CoD)
If I want a satisfying online experience:
H3 > MW2 > H2 > CoD4 > H:R > BO (obviously CE is ineligible for not having online support on consoles)
The only reason that I have MW2 so high on this one is due to the challenges. Those alone are reason to keep playing that pile of a game.
So that's what I think. Take it for what you will.
Now to gameplay. I don't play BF so I can't attest to any of its balancing, design, or whatever, so I'm going to leave that alone. I'm only going to compare CoD and Halo. Games in question will be every Halo FPS not named ODST, CoD4, MW2, and BO.
If I want solid weapon balancing:
H3 > CoD4 > H2 > H:CE > MW2 > H:R > BO
If I want great maps:
H2 is the best and no other game comes close. If you want the breakdown after that, it's:
H3 > H:CE > CoD4 > BO > H:R >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MW2
If I want fun gametypes:
Any Halo > Any CoD. However:
H3 > H:R > H:CE. CoD gametypes have been the same throughout, so there's no rating scale. They're shitty in every game. (S&D is fun though... if I want to play Counter-Strike and not CoD)
If I want a satisfying online experience:
H3 > MW2 > H2 > CoD4 > H:R > BO (obviously CE is ineligible for not having online support on consoles)
The only reason that I have MW2 so high on this one is due to the challenges. Those alone are reason to keep playing that pile of a game.
So that's what I think. Take it for what you will.


About Me
0
m0s3pH Wrote:
If I want great maps:
H2 is the best and no other game comes close. If you want the breakdown after that, it's:
H3 > H:CE > CoD4 > BO > H:R >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MW2
.
If I want great maps:
H2 is the best and no other game comes close. If you want the breakdown after that, it's:
H3 > H:CE > CoD4 > BO > H:R >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MW2
.
Halo: Reach... The game where the used the system that the community uses to make maps to make some to ship on the game because they got way to damn lazy.
© 1998-2025 Shadow Knight Media, LLC. All rights reserved. Mortal Kombat, the dragon logo and all character names are trademarks and copyright of Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.