Have you ever had sexual intercourse?

0
Im_JUST_Sayin Wrote:
Jesus approves (ie. we're both white conservatives and the state gov't officially sanctions our relationship through marriage).
Jesus approves (ie. we're both white conservatives and the state gov't officially sanctions our relationship through marriage).
Jesus does not approve of sex if you aint white conservative? HAHAHAHAHA

Good luck bonin Sarah Palin!


About Me

MK Online Featured User 31/3/2010 12/4/2011
-----------------------Gifts-----------------------
Shinnok-fan64 - s3Kt0r
0
The best thirty seconds of my life. lol
_____________________________________________________________
She kept lookin' at her watch
Doesn't matter, had sex!
But I cried the whole time
Doesn't matter, had sex!
I think she might've been a racist
Doesn't matter, had sex!
She put a bag on my head
Still counts!
_____________________________________________________________
She kept lookin' at her watch
Doesn't matter, had sex!
But I cried the whole time
Doesn't matter, had sex!
I think she might've been a racist
Doesn't matter, had sex!
She put a bag on my head
Still counts!

0
I have the right to express my belief that Christianity is highly illogical.
Sorry dude. You can read it and get offended all you want.
If it makes you feel any better, I think all religions are illogical and tend to be ignorant of scientific discovery.
Since when should we not have the right to express opinions just because people find them offensive?
Sorry dude. You can read it and get offended all you want.
If it makes you feel any better, I think all religions are illogical and tend to be ignorant of scientific discovery.
Since when should we not have the right to express opinions just because people find them offensive?


About Me
0
Im_JUST_Sayin Wrote:
Since when should we not have the right to express opinions just because people find them offensive?
Since when should we not have the right to express opinions just because people find them offensive?
There's expressing an opinion, and there's being condescending. You're smart enough to know the difference.
I mean, I could go around saying that there has never been a secular theory of moral knowledge that is actually viable (and there hasn't), but I don't. You know why? Because I don't like offending people just for the sake of offending people. MKO is my community. I don't use it as an outlet to vent bitter remarks against people I don't agree with.


About Me
Shao Kahn did nothing wrong
0
Im_JUST_Sayin Wrote:
I have the right to express my belief that Christianity is highly illogical.
Sorry dude. You can read it and get offended all you want.
If it makes you feel any better, I think all religions are illogical and tend to be ignorant of scientific discovery.
Since when should we not have the right to express opinions just because people find them offensive?
I have the right to express my belief that Christianity is highly illogical.
Sorry dude. You can read it and get offended all you want.
If it makes you feel any better, I think all religions are illogical and tend to be ignorant of scientific discovery.
Since when should we not have the right to express opinions just because people find them offensive?
The point is dude, you really didn't have to include that last part......at all.

0
TemperaryUserName Wrote:
There's expressing an opinion, and there's being condescending. You're smart enough to know the difference.
I mean, I could go around saying that there has never been a secular theory of moral knowledge that is actually viable (and there hasn't), but I don't. You know why? Because I don't like offending people just for the sake of offending people. MKO is my community. I don't use it as an outlet to vent bitter remarks against people I don't agree with.
Im_JUST_Sayin Wrote:
Since when should we not have the right to express opinions just because people find them offensive?
Since when should we not have the right to express opinions just because people find them offensive?
There's expressing an opinion, and there's being condescending. You're smart enough to know the difference.
I mean, I could go around saying that there has never been a secular theory of moral knowledge that is actually viable (and there hasn't), but I don't. You know why? Because I don't like offending people just for the sake of offending people. MKO is my community. I don't use it as an outlet to vent bitter remarks against people I don't agree with.
I would never get offended by someone making a completely ridiculous statement such as that.
Let me ask you a question: are your morals biblically based?


About Me
0
Im_JUST_Sayin Wrote:
I would never get offended by someone making a completely ridiculous statement such as that.
Let me ask you a question: are your morals biblically based?
I would never get offended by someone making a completely ridiculous statement such as that.
Let me ask you a question: are your morals biblically based?
I'll tell you what: I'll give you a little homework assignment, and if you complete it with flying colors, I'll answer anything you want.
Question A) what is the nature of objective morality?
Question B) How does one access knowledge of objective morality?
Question C) How does one discern moral agents from moral objects and morally neutral objects?
Knock yourself out.

0
The closest thing to Jesus is this thread is Temperary(sic)_User_Name.

0
TemperaryUserName Wrote:
I'll tell you what: I'll give you a little homework assignment, and if you complete it with flying colors, I'll answer anything you want.
Question A) what is the nature of objective morality?
Question B) How does one access knowledge of objective morality?
Question C) How does one discern moral agents from moral objects and morally neutral objects?
Knock yourself out.
Im_JUST_Sayin Wrote:
I would never get offended by someone making a completely ridiculous statement such as that.
Let me ask you a question: are your morals biblically based?
I would never get offended by someone making a completely ridiculous statement such as that.
Let me ask you a question: are your morals biblically based?
I'll tell you what: I'll give you a little homework assignment, and if you complete it with flying colors, I'll answer anything you want.
Question A) what is the nature of objective morality?
Question B) How does one access knowledge of objective morality?
Question C) How does one discern moral agents from moral objects and morally neutral objects?
Knock yourself out.
Or you could just answer my question, instead of trying to trick me into doing your Community College Philosophy 101 homework for you.


About Me
Shao Kahn did nothing wrong
0
*Sigh* When is this gonna get locked?

0
When HE comes back.
By HE, I mean the moderator.
And yes, it's a he. A woman in a position of power. Laughable.
By HE, I mean the moderator.
And yes, it's a he. A woman in a position of power. Laughable.


About Me
0
Im_JUST_Sayin Wrote:
Or you could just answer my question, instead of trying to trick me into doing your Community College Philosophy 101 homework for you.
Or you could just answer my question, instead of trying to trick me into doing your Community College Philosophy 101 homework for you.
That's what I thought.
Next time you decide to treat people like shit because they hold different views from you, you might want to make sure you have the actual answers and explanations yourself. In case you didn't know, Ethics is hard shit. If your going to mock other people's beliefs, you sure as hell better have a viable alternative moral theory in your right fucking pocket.
And I'm out.

0
TemperaryUserName Wrote:
That's what I thought.
Next time you decide to treat people like shit because they hold different views from you, you might want to make sure you have the actual answers and explanations yourself. In case you didn't know, Ethics is hard shit. If your going to mock other people's beliefs, you sure as hell better have a viable alternative moral theory in your right fucking pocket.
And I'm out.
Im_JUST_Sayin Wrote:
Or you could just answer my question, instead of trying to trick me into doing your Community College Philosophy 101 homework for you.
Or you could just answer my question, instead of trying to trick me into doing your Community College Philosophy 101 homework for you.
That's what I thought.
Next time you decide to treat people like shit because they hold different views from you, you might want to make sure you have the actual answers and explanations yourself. In case you didn't know, Ethics is hard shit. If your going to mock other people's beliefs, you sure as hell better have a viable alternative moral theory in your right fucking pocket.
And I'm out.
So, I ask you a question.
You dodge it by asking me a question in return.
So, I refuse to humor you.
Thus, you win?
And I'd better have a theory in my pocket?
This whole thing makes no sense, sort of like believing that a dude is his own dad, but talks to himself in space, then dies, then comes back, and flies up into the sky and disappears, and somehow we're all forgiven because of this. Yes, same sort of reasoning.

0
Okay, this thread's starting to get derailed here. I have to be honest, I didn't take the last sentence of the original post seriously, but I don't like that this is turning into an argument that won't get anything more than two users furious at one-another and resolve nothing.
Baiting users into arguments isn't allowed here, and harassing a user's beliefs isn't tolerated either. Just because you don't share the same ideas does not give you the right to mock them at every turn, regardless of whether or not you consider them rational or logical.
I'm going to close this thread before it loses all meaning and before it becomes heated, as I doubt it can be saved.
Baiting users into arguments isn't allowed here, and harassing a user's beliefs isn't tolerated either. Just because you don't share the same ideas does not give you the right to mock them at every turn, regardless of whether or not you consider them rational or logical.
I'm going to close this thread before it loses all meaning and before it becomes heated, as I doubt it can be saved.
© 1998-2025 Shadow Knight Media, LLC. All rights reserved. Mortal Kombat, the dragon logo and all character names are trademarks and copyright of Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.