Avatar
Jerrod
Avatar
About Me
MKO Moderator, Story Writer, Actor
Signature by Pred
03/18/2004 04:44 PM (UTC)
0
Until a really good reason is made and recognized by several people, Pluto and Sedna should just remain known as planets. It's so much simpler that way IMO.
Avatar
Dizturbd1
Avatar
About Me

...think of pretty things...

03/18/2004 11:38 PM (UTC)
0

Terranova Wrote:

Dizturbd1 Wrote:


planet - pla 'net, n. A celestial body which revolves around the sun or other center...from New Webster's Expanded Dictionary. Now, I know there's more to it, as even a moon could be classified as a planet, but this is from a dictionary - you know, compiled by people who...ahem...KNOW what they're talking about! I've heard of the whole Pluto debate, but obviously not a lot came of it - Pluto is still classified as a planet. I've definitely never heard a scientist disputing whether Jupiter, Neptune, Uranus, etc. were planets, so really - everything you've said - hasn't made much sense. Be informed before you decided to TELL people what's what.

Edit - after reading this over, it kinda sounds mean...sorry!...it's my inner debater coming out. I still don't believe in your definition or reasoning for disregarding this new planet, especially since you couldn't adequately prove your point.

It seems you didn't bother to use the link i provided, in which case if you had you would have found that what i have said about pluto is prity much correct, yes it's still kinda classed as a planet, for now, but only because the governing body that name planets etc dont want to re-write history also they cant make up their minds as how to determin planets and which therory to beleive so things are kinda up in the air at the moment many want to leave things as they are many dont it's kinda like when people were told that the earth wasn't flat many didn't want to change that fact it was already written in history, but that was re-written and changed over time the same here, as to to where i got my info i was informed by a university professor at Oxford uni he's one of the experts that wants to change the definition of what makes a planet he's not alone in this, this is'nt some wild thing iv'e just plucked out of nowhere ive done a lot of research as well as studying for a degree on the subject so i think i do know what i'm saying, maybe the definition will change maybe it wont maybe something totally different will be used. I dont want to get into a major argument over this I just posted what i was told and what i knew to be true at the time,


You know, for someone who has been studying for a degree on the subject, you contradicted yourself quite often...good thing it wasn't a degree in the english language as well. Try some punctuation next time. And...I take back what I said about the post sounding mean - I was still under the impression that you were making an attempt at intelligent debate.
Avatar
Terranova
03/19/2004 02:42 PM (UTC)
0
Maybe you should practice what you preach, i have provided a link to back up what i have been saying as yet you have provided nothing to prove me wrong other than comments from someone who is clearly narrow minded and not ready to listen or accept that you may be wrong on the subject, I was providing an intelligent debate but that requires two people with intelligence and clearly you have none.

Dizturbd1 Wrote:

You know, for someone who has been studying for a degree on the subject, you contradicted yourself quite often...good thing it wasn't a degree in the english language as well. Try some punctuation next time. And...I take back what I said about the post sounding mean - I was still under the impression that you were making an attempt at intelligent debate.

Pages: 2
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
© 1998-2024 Shadow Knight Media, LLC. All rights reserved. Read our Privacy Policy.
Mortal Kombat, the dragon logo and all character names are trademarks and copyright of Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.