Transhumanism
Transhumanism
0
posted02/10/2014 02:25 PM (UTC)by
Currently I have been thinking about stem-cell research and the current state our education system is over here, as both are somewhat topical right now. Essentially I have come to conlude that I am in most ways a tranhumanist.
The question I have come to ask -especially since I am awaiting the new Robocop remake- is wether to further advance the human body. Currently I am all in favour of artificial extensions or even replacements for the human body, and since we are already cyborgs on the most rudimentary level (glasses), I think a full body prosthesis should relatively soon be possible.
Also quick note: anyone who played rpgs should be familiar with the notion of cybernetic modifications hurting your "humanity". I find it to be illogical.
The question I have come to ask -especially since I am awaiting the new Robocop remake- is wether to further advance the human body. Currently I am all in favour of artificial extensions or even replacements for the human body, and since we are already cyborgs on the most rudimentary level (glasses), I think a full body prosthesis should relatively soon be possible.
Also quick note: anyone who played rpgs should be familiar with the notion of cybernetic modifications hurting your "humanity". I find it to be illogical.
Zmoke Wrote:
Do you want to be Shang Tsung or something?
Do you want to be Shang Tsung or something?
Somewhen I did.
Basically yes. There is no overrriding principle that basically prevents us to take our hands to our own evolution. Genetically recurring defects could be cured for example. And I am not talking about just electronics either: if we could manufacture healthier organs then go for it.
0
Chrome Wrote:
conlude
conlude
*conclude
Chrome Wrote:
wether
wether
*whether
Chrome Wrote:
Also quick note: anyone who played rpgs should be familiar with the notion of cybernetic modifications hurting your "humanity". I find it to be illogical.
Also quick note: anyone who played rpgs should be familiar with the notion of cybernetic modifications hurting your "humanity". I find it to be illogical.
Well, it depends on how human you already are. If you already strive to be emotionless and logical, then you might as well just be a machine.
0
Well Chrome, if you become a cyber ninja with the strength of 5 gorillas, I would give you my support.
I think that using technology to get rid of birth defects and even repairing limbs is not a bad idea at all.
I think that using technology to get rid of birth defects and even repairing limbs is not a bad idea at all.
0
I like that J-R's contribution to a discussion about transhumanism is spelling corrections. Adorable.
Anyway, my stance would be somewhere in-between. I'm not one to stand in the way of progress, so if people want to go full cyborg, I say have at it. But strictly for myself? I'm in a good place with my gross meat body and feel no need to alter it.
Anyway, my stance would be somewhere in-between. I'm not one to stand in the way of progress, so if people want to go full cyborg, I say have at it. But strictly for myself? I'm in a good place with my gross meat body and feel no need to alter it.
Sorry, those were above my allowed limit of zero typos.
What I find redundant and false as an existential question is the how human I am? question: for one, the amount of artificial or nonnatal modifications of your body are in no corellation to your personality.
Being human is more or less behaviour. So even if I am nothing more than a sack of brain tissue hooked up to a polymer body, I am still human.
What I find redundant and false as an existential question is the how human I am? question: for one, the amount of artificial or nonnatal modifications of your body are in no corellation to your personality.
Being human is more or less behaviour. So even if I am nothing more than a sack of brain tissue hooked up to a polymer body, I am still human.


About Me
Save a life; Kill a necromorph
0
Look at yourself you are indoctrinated. You are talking about something we can't control.
Other than the typical Mass Effect Paragon RPing, Transhumanism is a good thing for humanity. Regardless if the rest of the galaxy is hostile or not, transhumanism in all forms will help Humanity in the long term for various reasons.
Other than the typical Mass Effect Paragon RPing, Transhumanism is a good thing for humanity. Regardless if the rest of the galaxy is hostile or not, transhumanism in all forms will help Humanity in the long term for various reasons.
Zmoke Wrote:
Being human/humane is not the same as being a homo sapiens. Even an alien could bear that trait even though they were of another species. As for being a human being – even a vegetable homo erectus would be one.
Being human/humane is not the same as being a homo sapiens. Even an alien could bear that trait even though they were of another species. As for being a human being – even a vegetable homo erectus would be one.
Being humane in your words is more important to me than being genetically human - up to the point if the vessel does not influence the mind due to genetics.
Every thought and emotion is biochemistry, if we can for example replicate the original neural network into a more enhanced body, that would be perfect, hell, we could even improve on it and let's say, goodbye epilepsy or genetically inherited flaws.
A vegetative human is genetically a homo sapiens sapiens. So? Unless you are talking about braindead people, who are by definition dead.
I would be joyous for example if I could keep absolute order inside my head.
Chrome Wrote:
Being humane in your words is more important to me than being genetically human - up to the point if the vessel does not influence the mind due to genetics.
Zmoke Wrote:
Being human/humane is not the same as being a homo sapiens. Even an alien could bear that trait even though they were of another species. As for being a human being – even a vegetable homo erectus would be one.
Being human/humane is not the same as being a homo sapiens. Even an alien could bear that trait even though they were of another species. As for being a human being – even a vegetable homo erectus would be one.
Being humane in your words is more important to me than being genetically human - up to the point if the vessel does not influence the mind due to genetics.
Every thought and emotion is biochemistry, if we can for example replicate the original neural network into a more enhanced body, that would be perfect, hell, we could even improve on it and let's say, goodbye epilepsy or genetically inherited flaws.
A vegetative human is genetically a homo sapiens sapiens. So? Unless you are talking about braindead people, who are by definition dead.I brought up that 'human' is also an adjective and that asking whether one's human or not is not as much of an existential question as asking whether one is a human being is. I could refer to comatose people and this reference pointed out that not all human beings can be human.
Chrome Wrote:
I would be joyous for example if I could keep absolute order inside my head.
Is that particularly challenging? Do you have a lack of self-discipline?I would be joyous for example if I could keep absolute order inside my head.
0
You must come from a messed up country. This shit should only be a fantasy, not reality.
Chrome Wrote:
Sometimes, though it has more to do with being overworked. Also, I cannot not keep myself away from delicious meats and I am getting fatter.
Sometimes, though it has more to do with being overworked. Also, I cannot not keep myself away from delicious meats and I am getting fatter.
Thus you are overwhelmed by all the extra chores and the overtime work you get, so to speak, if I got it right. Have you ever considered becoming a vegetarian? It's socially acceptable these days, and downright healthy.
I like vegetables, well, some of them (carrots> keep that shit out of here). And the cuisine is generally good. Though lard and fat is a big part of our dishes, it is generally offset by good quality produce. I simply like to eat meat. And fruit.
As for fantasy - > we are already cyborgs by definition. Having glasses is basically a warrant for being a cyborg for the time you are wearing them.
Human progress proves without a doubt that technological advancements are beneficial. True, it can be used to detrimental effects, but the technology itself is unquestionably for our benefit.
Luddism, religion and dogma against proven physical reality is harmful, therefore should be abandoned.
As for fantasy - > we are already cyborgs by definition. Having glasses is basically a warrant for being a cyborg for the time you are wearing them.
Human progress proves without a doubt that technological advancements are beneficial. True, it can be used to detrimental effects, but the technology itself is unquestionably for our benefit.
Luddism, religion and dogma against proven physical reality is harmful, therefore should be abandoned.
0
In terms of eating, I would suggest mapping out the ratio of food. I like to eat meat as well, and I've been having a fair bit of it during this time of the year. Meat can be very beneficial, but it should be a side while vegetables should be the main focus (about half of your plate). Throw in some spices like cayenne pepper, and it could do you some good.
I cannot stand most of them. Salad in small amounts, but I am mostly a fruit guy: tomatoes, pears, paprika... Well, at least it is not fish, because I cannot even stand the smell of fish without gagging. Same with carrots, I don't like the taste.
About Me
STATE FED LIES CHARM EMPTY EYES. Anon.
0
When did this turn from being about cyber-enhancements affecting the human condidtion to fun things to do with root vegetables?
I don't think the kinds of additions you mentioned make a person any less human, since to some degree, they exist already. In prosthetic limbs and artificial hips (not so much wearing glasses - i think that was reaching a little too far?)
The real ethical question arises from AI, if a person would be willing to go that far. We all must know by now as computer users that they can become corrupted by viruses or breakage. It's one thing to programme traits into your own system functions, but you leave yourself vulnerable to outside malicious influences too. How much of yourself would you be then?
I don't think the kinds of additions you mentioned make a person any less human, since to some degree, they exist already. In prosthetic limbs and artificial hips (not so much wearing glasses - i think that was reaching a little too far?)
The real ethical question arises from AI, if a person would be willing to go that far. We all must know by now as computer users that they can become corrupted by viruses or breakage. It's one thing to programme traits into your own system functions, but you leave yourself vulnerable to outside malicious influences too. How much of yourself would you be then?
© 1998-2025 Shadow Knight Media, LLC. All rights reserved. Mortal Kombat, the dragon logo and all character names are trademarks and copyright of Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.