very important for men!

0
EDIT: I suck at this


0
About Me
STATE FED LIES CHARM EMPTY EYES. Anon.
0
I wouldn't normally read posts about masturbation (I'm pretty sure by now there's no new information anyone could give me), but this is funny.
Seriously, it's just about moderation. Everything in moderation is fine.
But when someone i know tried to abstain, after three days he got crabby and bitchy. There's definitely valid reasons for doing it.
KEEP WANKING EVERYONE!!
Seriously, it's just about moderation. Everything in moderation is fine.
But when someone i know tried to abstain, after three days he got crabby and bitchy. There's definitely valid reasons for doing it.
KEEP WANKING EVERYONE!!


About Me
0
rofl! good lord the things that become topics these days 
About Me
Determination
0
http://www.gq.com/blogs/the-feed/2013/11/10-reasons-why-you-should-quit-watching-porn.html
Ignorance is bliss I suppose.
Ignorance is bliss I suppose.
chardballz Wrote:
http://www.gq.com/blogs/the-feed/2013/11/10-reasons-why-you-should-quit-watching-porn.html
Ignorance is bliss I suppose.
http://www.gq.com/blogs/the-feed/2013/11/10-reasons-why-you-should-quit-watching-porn.html
Ignorance is bliss I suppose.
This article is worthless because - >
- it gives no source of the information it presents.
-the information is not peer reviewed.
-the information is not shown to be in conjunction with other research.
-they are blind nonfactual statements.
-the site is suspect.
-buzzword count is high.
And I have preknowledge that what6 it states is actually false. The article seems to run with the false corellation that sexual inadequacy and deviancy (another problematic word) is tied to masturbation.
Clearly this is the work of either some religious jackass or someone who just likes to be contrary.
About Me

0
rainbowrabbit Wrote:
No, what you were trying to do was stick your nose where it didn't belong by dictating what people should or should not do with their bodies. That's none of your business and no one asked for your help in the first place.
sorcerersoul Wrote:
Jesus you guys are pricks here. Fucking Assholes. I'm done here. I was just trying to help you guys out by some scientifically proven facts about wasting your life source. I'm gonna go make love to my wife now. Fuckers.
Jesus you guys are pricks here. Fucking Assholes. I'm done here. I was just trying to help you guys out by some scientifically proven facts about wasting your life source. I'm gonna go make love to my wife now. Fuckers.
No, what you were trying to do was stick your nose where it didn't belong by dictating what people should or should not do with their bodies. That's none of your business and no one asked for your help in the first place.
State of an emergency screamer rapist protection program alert
About Me
Determination
0
Chrome Wrote:
This article is worthless because - >
- it gives no source of the information it presents.
-the information is not peer reviewed.
-the information is not shown to be in conjunction with other research.
-they are blind nonfactual statements.
-the site is suspect.
-buzzword count is high.
And I have preknowledge that what6 it states is actually false. The article seems to run with the false corellation that sexual inadequacy and deviancy (another problematic word) is tied to masturbation.
Clearly this is the work of either some religious jackass or someone who just likes to be contrary.
chardballz Wrote:
http://www.gq.com/blogs/the-feed/2013/11/10-reasons-why-you-should-quit-watching-porn.html
Ignorance is bliss I suppose.
http://www.gq.com/blogs/the-feed/2013/11/10-reasons-why-you-should-quit-watching-porn.html
Ignorance is bliss I suppose.
This article is worthless because - >
- it gives no source of the information it presents.
-the information is not peer reviewed.
-the information is not shown to be in conjunction with other research.
-they are blind nonfactual statements.
-the site is suspect.
-buzzword count is high.
And I have preknowledge that what6 it states is actually false. The article seems to run with the false corellation that sexual inadequacy and deviancy (another problematic word) is tied to masturbation.
Clearly this is the work of either some religious jackass or someone who just likes to be contrary.
So if an article is not peer reviewed it has no credibility?
Sigh - again...
http://donnypauling.net/2014/09/16/how-porn-affects-us-a-list-of-peer-reviewed-studies-as-well-as-magazine-articles/


About Me
Get that ass BANNED
0
WE DON'T GIVE A FFFFFUUUUUUCK. We are going to masterbate to our hearts content whether its good or bad.
"If something feels bad, then it must be good"
Time to fuck a blender.
"If something feels bad, then it must be good"
Time to fuck a blender.

0
Chrome Wrote:
This article is worthless because - >
- it gives no source of the information it presents.
-the information is not peer reviewed.
-the information is not shown to be in conjunction with other research.
-they are blind nonfactual statements.
-the site is suspect.
-buzzword count is high.
And I have preknowledge that what6 it states is actually false. The article seems to run with the false corellation that sexual inadequacy and deviancy (another problematic word) is tied to masturbation.
Clearly this is the work of either some religious jackass or someone who just likes to be contrary.
chardballz Wrote:
http://www.gq.com/blogs/the-feed/2013/11/10-reasons-why-you-should-quit-watching-porn.html
Ignorance is bliss I suppose.
http://www.gq.com/blogs/the-feed/2013/11/10-reasons-why-you-should-quit-watching-porn.html
Ignorance is bliss I suppose.
This article is worthless because - >
- it gives no source of the information it presents.
-the information is not peer reviewed.
-the information is not shown to be in conjunction with other research.
-they are blind nonfactual statements.
-the site is suspect.
-buzzword count is high.
And I have preknowledge that what6 it states is actually false. The article seems to run with the false corellation that sexual inadequacy and deviancy (another problematic word) is tied to masturbation.
Clearly this is the work of either some religious jackass or someone who just likes to be contrary.
Exactly, it's a stupid puff piece.
chardballz Wrote:
So if an article is not peer reviewed it has no credibility?
Sigh - again...
http://donnypauling.net/2014/09/16/how-porn-affects-us-a-list-of-peer-reviewed-studies-as-well-as-magazine-articles/
Chrome Wrote:
This article is worthless because - >
- it gives no source of the information it presents.
-the information is not peer reviewed.
-the information is not shown to be in conjunction with other research.
-they are blind nonfactual statements.
-the site is suspect.
-buzzword count is high.
And I have preknowledge that what6 it states is actually false. The article seems to run with the false corellation that sexual inadequacy and deviancy (another problematic word) is tied to masturbation.
Clearly this is the work of either some religious jackass or someone who just likes to be contrary.
chardballz Wrote:
http://www.gq.com/blogs/the-feed/2013/11/10-reasons-why-you-should-quit-watching-porn.html
Ignorance is bliss I suppose.
http://www.gq.com/blogs/the-feed/2013/11/10-reasons-why-you-should-quit-watching-porn.html
Ignorance is bliss I suppose.
This article is worthless because - >
- it gives no source of the information it presents.
-the information is not peer reviewed.
-the information is not shown to be in conjunction with other research.
-they are blind nonfactual statements.
-the site is suspect.
-buzzword count is high.
And I have preknowledge that what6 it states is actually false. The article seems to run with the false corellation that sexual inadequacy and deviancy (another problematic word) is tied to masturbation.
Clearly this is the work of either some religious jackass or someone who just likes to be contrary.
So if an article is not peer reviewed it has no credibility?
Sigh - again...
http://donnypauling.net/2014/09/16/how-porn-affects-us-a-list-of-peer-reviewed-studies-as-well-as-magazine-articles/
If the content of the article, not the article itself. Basically proofreading and double-checking your evidence.
Time to fuck a blender is getting ona shirt. Now.
0
You know I like master bating but after a while it just feels like I've fucked myself.
Brady_Got_Caged Wrote:
You know I like master bating but after a while it just feels like I've fucked myself.
You know I like master bating but after a while it just feels like I've fucked myself.
Ayeeeeeeeee, this guy!
In the end, what guys do with their spadidly junk is up to them. I'm sure if it was a big problem, there'd be more stuff about this. I think this is the first time I've heard anything about the problems of enjoying themselves.
Obviously, I even have a hard time saying the words by typing. I giggle when someone use the exact terms.
About Me

0
Kamionero Wrote:
Exactly, it's a stupid puff piece.
Chrome Wrote:
This article is worthless because - >
- it gives no source of the information it presents.
-the information is not peer reviewed.
-the information is not shown to be in conjunction with other research.
-they are blind nonfactual statements.
-the site is suspect.
-buzzword count is high.
And I have preknowledge that what6 it states is actually false. The article seems to run with the false corellation that sexual inadequacy and deviancy (another problematic word) is tied to masturbation.
Clearly this is the work of either some religious jackass or someone who just likes to be contrary.
chardballz Wrote:
http://www.gq.com/blogs/the-feed/2013/11/10-reasons-why-you-should-quit-watching-porn.html
Ignorance is bliss I suppose.
http://www.gq.com/blogs/the-feed/2013/11/10-reasons-why-you-should-quit-watching-porn.html
Ignorance is bliss I suppose.
This article is worthless because - >
- it gives no source of the information it presents.
-the information is not peer reviewed.
-the information is not shown to be in conjunction with other research.
-they are blind nonfactual statements.
-the site is suspect.
-buzzword count is high.
And I have preknowledge that what6 it states is actually false. The article seems to run with the false corellation that sexual inadequacy and deviancy (another problematic word) is tied to masturbation.
Clearly this is the work of either some religious jackass or someone who just likes to be contrary.
Exactly, it's a stupid puff piece.
KAMIO-MOTHERFUCKING-NARO!
Thanks for the sig way back in the day


About Me
hey
0
Hmm, I always thought that masturbation was a completely normal and healthy thing to do. I thought when you go a long time without doing it that "energy boost" you're talking about was just you getting antsy from blue balls. But I guess it's a good thing because it's actually getting your testosterone back.
But it's still okay for girls to do it, right?
But it's still okay for girls to do it, right?
0
Ok so I've given it thought and even if this article is accurate through scientific research, i was never trying to tell anyone what to do with their wrinkle sticks. If i offended anyone I'm sorry. I was just trying to let FerraTorr know that autistic people shouldn't masturbate their mentality away 
0
Lol yes. Give me "skull points"for information... Wow
0
Zentile Wrote:
God why is this thread open and where are the skull points?
God why is this thread open and where are the skull points?
The comments in the thread are actually more civilized than similar topics have received in the past. Probably why. I see no reason why for either.
0
Kabal20 Wrote:
The comments in the thread are actually more civilized than similar topics have received in the past. Probably why. I see no reason why for either.
Zentile Wrote:
God why is this thread open and where are the skull points?
God why is this thread open and where are the skull points?
The comments in the thread are actually more civilized than similar topics have received in the past. Probably why. I see no reason why for either.
Thank you sir, you're a gentleman and a scholar. And to that i bid this thread adieu. Again, i never meant to tell anyone what to do with their one eyed monsters, and i probably jumped to conclusions, i was just interested in the article i had read. This can be closed now.
About Me

0
sorcerersoul Wrote:
Thank you sir, you're a gentleman and a scholar
Kabal20 Wrote:
The comments in the thread are actually more civilized than similar topics have received in the past. Probably why. I see no reason why for either.
Zentile Wrote:
God why is this thread open and where are the skull points?
God why is this thread open and where are the skull points?
The comments in the thread are actually more civilized than similar topics have received in the past. Probably why. I see no reason why for either.
Thank you sir, you're a gentleman and a scholar
Bwahaha *tips fedora*


About Me
0
I think that's enough internet for me today.
About Me
FB: Trans4Materia Card Game I invented "Circling Vulture, Laughing Hyena"
True story, it happened to a friend of a friend of mine... EVERYBODY!
0
Feminine how?
I`d be more concerned about the synthetic Estrogen, and other
plastic chemicals, synthetic hormones n drugs in the water.
Technically it counts as Genocide, as there are millions of potential lives wasted per shot. Life is supposed to be sacred.
This was for the ``What`s wrong with whores anyway`` thread, but since it applies here too, it was confirmed a few years ago that oral sex causes Cancer. Wouldn`t be surprised if some Prostate Cancer was caused by anal sex.
What happens if sperm try to impregnate regular cells?
Human caviar is not a thing.
Stop eating your children, oh ye followers of Moloch!
Ka-Tra
I`d be more concerned about the synthetic Estrogen, and other
plastic chemicals, synthetic hormones n drugs in the water.
Technically it counts as Genocide, as there are millions of potential lives wasted per shot. Life is supposed to be sacred.
This was for the ``What`s wrong with whores anyway`` thread, but since it applies here too, it was confirmed a few years ago that oral sex causes Cancer. Wouldn`t be surprised if some Prostate Cancer was caused by anal sex.
What happens if sperm try to impregnate regular cells?
Human caviar is not a thing.
Stop eating your children, oh ye followers of Moloch!
Ka-Tra
© 1998-2025 Shadow Knight Media, LLC. All rights reserved. Mortal Kombat, the dragon logo and all character names are trademarks and copyright of Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.