Disgraceful? Cool down, boy, u know nothing of Keith Cooke. He rocked. He WAS SubZero. Cool, but with that mysterious and kinda evil tone, but always on the good side. He was perfect. And btw, how can u tell if Petit was very good as SubZero? There was no acting to it, except a couple of faces.

Zentile Wrote: Disgraceful? Cool down, boy, u know nothing of Keith Cooke. He rocked. He WAS SubZero. Cool, but with that mysterious and kinda evil tone, but always on the good side. He was perfect. And btw, how can u tell if Petit was very good as SubZero? There was no acting to it, except a couple of faces.

Yeah, zip acting, but a heck of a lot of fighting for Subbie 5. Keith did good acting, but not enough fighting for me to really evaluate an opinion on that.

I he leaves his mask on, I dosen't matter to me. The second Sub-Zero was fine.

Personally I think Keith Cooke is a good fighter but terrible actor, he was great as Reptile no acting just fighting, but i think Petit had a better look as Sub. Plus I basically think Cooke is kind of a douche bag.

Douche bag??? Wow,I learned a new work today mommy, but I have no idea what it means!

JohnnyCage5 Wrote: Personally I think Keith Cooke is a good fighter but terrible actor, he was great as Reptile no acting just fighting, but i think Petit had a better look as Sub. Plus I basically think Cooke is kind of a douche bag.

1. François Petit always had that stupid 'I'm just here for teh money' look on his face. Look at him when he's concentrating that ice power to freeze the OutWorld guard. He's like ''*sighs* boring...'' . He gave no personality to Sub, and he didn't do much fighting either, IMO.
2. Cooke is not a bad actor. He's no Robin Shou, but he's no JJ Perry neither. He worked out great as Subby.
3. Petit has a better look as SubZero? He didn't even take off his mask. We didn't c anything on him besides his eyes, and the fact that he was pretty short. Cooke looked almost exactly like the SubZero from MK3.
4. A douche bag? what do u mean?