I give the graphics an 8.0 because even thou they were very good, they could have been better. They had to make a standerd game for all three systems so the Xbox and PS2 games didn't look the best they could have. But they do look great. The next MK game will use all that each system can offer. I expect the Xbox to look the best. The PS2 a close second and then the GC.
Ps2 will probably look the crappiest out of the lot. Just look at soul calibur 2. Ps2's version is the crappiest of the 3. It has slow down and graphics are a little crappier when compared to gc and xbox.
Eniamurt Wrote: I give the graphics an 8.0 because even thou they were very good, they could have been better. They had to make a standerd game for all three systems so the Xbox and PS2 games didn't look the best they could have. But they do look great. The next MK game will use all that each system can offer. I expect the Xbox to look the best. The PS2 a close second and then the GC.
10/10. MKDA has simply one of the best graphics Ive ever seen in any game!!!! Its totally awsome and very well worked. AND, it has the best graphics of any Mk game. Im really satisfied with MKDA. 10/10. Oh, and BTW, PS2 graphics on MKDA are actually outstanding! but Xbox is MUCH better.
BoardTng Wrote: yes. what do yall think of it compared to tekken?? I still think mkda has the advantage. But thats my opinion.
Good question. IMO, the graphics look like they are in the same quality for the most part but I think MKDA has better graphics overall due to other details.
MKDA has bteer grapphics IMO: Tekkens is good, BUT they dont look as if they were worked on a lot. Many of the charcaters in that game have square-like heads and body parts, not as realistic as MK.
