UK MAG 360 Gamer gives MK vs DC Universe 5/10
0
Yesss first low notes
Who gives LESS???
Who gives LESS???
All reviews, both good and bad, are nothing more than glorified reviews.
While general consensus tends to agree on the perks and flaws of most games, that still doesn't mean the game won't be enjoyed by its intended fanbase.
For example, older games like Castlevania: Legacy of Darkness, Hybrid Heaven, and Shadow Hearts got pretty mediocre scores, while I view them as ambitious, amazing, original alternatives to the majority of the mainstream crap most companies put out that I thoroughly enjoyed.
Meanwhile, I think games like Metal Gear Solid 4, Grand Theft Auto 4, and Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion were highly overrated.
Those are my opinions and they hold about as much weight and merit as any other "professional" critic's review score.
While general consensus tends to agree on the perks and flaws of most games, that still doesn't mean the game won't be enjoyed by its intended fanbase.
For example, older games like Castlevania: Legacy of Darkness, Hybrid Heaven, and Shadow Hearts got pretty mediocre scores, while I view them as ambitious, amazing, original alternatives to the majority of the mainstream crap most companies put out that I thoroughly enjoyed.
Meanwhile, I think games like Metal Gear Solid 4, Grand Theft Auto 4, and Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion were highly overrated.
Those are my opinions and they hold about as much weight and merit as any other "professional" critic's review score.
I don't consider game reviews at all when I am deciding whether or not to buy a game.
To this day I don't get why some will strictly buy games (or not) on a reviewer's say so. I mean, some of them try to be fair and unbiased...but still at the end of the day it's THEIR opinion of the game. Doesn't mean you'll feel the same way after playing it. I just don't understand it. But hey, people can do what they want. It's just how do you know you're not missing out on a game that you might have liked if you'd at least rented it to find out first?
People have different views on video games, same as everything else in life. Much better to form your own opinion than to conform to someone else's.
To this day I don't get why some will strictly buy games (or not) on a reviewer's say so. I mean, some of them try to be fair and unbiased...but still at the end of the day it's THEIR opinion of the game. Doesn't mean you'll feel the same way after playing it. I just don't understand it. But hey, people can do what they want. It's just how do you know you're not missing out on a game that you might have liked if you'd at least rented it to find out first?
People have different views on video games, same as everything else in life. Much better to form your own opinion than to conform to someone else's.
About Me
I need a new sig, something with Kabal from UMK3 would be sweet. Just imagine that here
0
ProfesserAhnka Wrote:
LMAO at slow, clunky and dull! Don't try and bash the reviwer for speaking the truth,lol. Also he needs to change the "only die hard fans will find it amusing" to fan boys. I have no more controll over this situation, sometimes people don't like listening to reason, well its been confirmed by two people so far, the game sucks.
RealSubZero Wrote:
Yeah 5/10
I cant scan it here, there website is www.gamer.tm
Its not online yet as its in their december issue.
They say its slow, clunky, dull, boring and unbalanced.
Now while saying that, the reviewer seemed like the most biased idiot known to man. He kept referencing how great street fighter was, how people shouldnt get this and wait for the new street fighter etc. He also said that on Die Hard MK Fans will find this Mildly amusing for a very short time.
Now the review was terrible but to be honest Im not even gonna listen to him as i also just read a review in PSM3 magazine which gave it 8/10. They said is unashamedly casual but said its Tremendous Fun and undeniably the best MK since UMK3. They say its fast, frantic and a hell of a lot of fun.
Now my question, why the hell do magazines allow biased reviewers near their titles to review. Surely this kind of crap will ruin the reputation of the magazine. The only reason i know it was biased and the mag is biased as a whole is they had a FIFA fanboy review PES9 and he only gave it 6/10 constantly stating how great fifa is? its pathetic
Yeah 5/10
I cant scan it here, there website is www.gamer.tm
Its not online yet as its in their december issue.
They say its slow, clunky, dull, boring and unbalanced.
Now while saying that, the reviewer seemed like the most biased idiot known to man. He kept referencing how great street fighter was, how people shouldnt get this and wait for the new street fighter etc. He also said that on Die Hard MK Fans will find this Mildly amusing for a very short time.
Now the review was terrible but to be honest Im not even gonna listen to him as i also just read a review in PSM3 magazine which gave it 8/10. They said is unashamedly casual but said its Tremendous Fun and undeniably the best MK since UMK3. They say its fast, frantic and a hell of a lot of fun.
Now my question, why the hell do magazines allow biased reviewers near their titles to review. Surely this kind of crap will ruin the reputation of the magazine. The only reason i know it was biased and the mag is biased as a whole is they had a FIFA fanboy review PES9 and he only gave it 6/10 constantly stating how great fifa is? its pathetic
LMAO at slow, clunky and dull! Don't try and bash the reviwer for speaking the truth,lol. Also he needs to change the "only die hard fans will find it amusing" to fan boys. I have no more controll over this situation, sometimes people don't like listening to reason, well its been confirmed by two people so far, the game sucks.
Because two people say it, it's automaticaly true!
Videogame critics are worthless people. I only read reviews to get an inside look of the game I'm interested in, I could care less about their pathetic opinions.
-GTB


0
mastermalone Wrote:
Quoted for the truth.
I don't read reviews to make a decision on whether or not I'm going to like a game. You can't always trust the opinions of some one else. For example, I love RPG's and strategy games yet, my friend can't stand them. If he were to write a review of Final Fantasy (insert number), he would no doubt score the game low.
There were a number of games that scored low that I absolutely loved. People seemd to talk shit about King of Fighters 2003 yet, I loved that game. Some people hated Blood Rayne 1 and 2 yet, I couldn't get enough of them. Years ago, I came to the conclusion that these critics were just criticizing a product that they themselves could not produce even if they tried. There is also that old "band wagon" effect on some reviewers. If a game series is not "cool" in their circle of associates, they are more likey to write a bad review for it.
Granted, there are reviews that are right on the money.
Peace
oracle Wrote:
hmm. i don't think everyone that gives MK vs DCU a bad score is a street figther fan boy.
but again i don't use reviewers to tell me how much i'm going to enjoy a game.
hmm. i don't think everyone that gives MK vs DCU a bad score is a street figther fan boy.
but again i don't use reviewers to tell me how much i'm going to enjoy a game.
Quoted for the truth.
I don't read reviews to make a decision on whether or not I'm going to like a game. You can't always trust the opinions of some one else. For example, I love RPG's and strategy games yet, my friend can't stand them. If he were to write a review of Final Fantasy (insert number), he would no doubt score the game low.
There were a number of games that scored low that I absolutely loved. People seemd to talk shit about King of Fighters 2003 yet, I loved that game. Some people hated Blood Rayne 1 and 2 yet, I couldn't get enough of them. Years ago, I came to the conclusion that these critics were just criticizing a product that they themselves could not produce even if they tried. There is also that old "band wagon" effect on some reviewers. If a game series is not "cool" in their circle of associates, they are more likey to write a bad review for it.
Granted, there are reviews that are right on the money.
Peace
Agreed here I only trust my perspective of the game and not a reviewer besides its a matter of peoples opinions like if you gave the job of reviewing a game to a random person chances are you dont know what they might say meaning im just gonna wait till the game comes out but from what ive seen so far I cant wait 2 play it!


0
I hope you guys be honest when you do play it, if it sucks it sucks, don't FORCE yourself to like it. But it could be good, IDK.
About Me
Determination
0
ProfesserAhnka Wrote:
I hope you guys be honest when you do play it, if it sucks it sucks, don't FORCE yourself to like it. But it could be good, IDK.
I hope you guys be honest when you do play it, if it sucks it sucks, don't FORCE yourself to like it. But it could be good, IDK.
Im with ya!
If this game does get crap reviews across the board then people need to accept it for what it is.
Being honest iv played hundreds and hundreds of games.
If it wasnt for the fact that i love MK i probably wouldnt buy this game.
*I don't get why people like ProfesserAhnka continue to dis the game.
Yea, they think it looks bad and they have lost all hope in Midway as a game company. But that is no reason to try and force your opinion upon people by saying "You'll be sorry" and " Don't come crying to me when the game sucks". We all get it, the game might suck it might not. I have agreed with a lot of the stuff people have said on here but the ranters get on my nerves a bit.
*On topic, I think it is wrong for that mag to have a bias reviewer. Thats about it, for all we know the guy could have never played Mk games on his own time. Well clearly seeing as he's a huge street fighter fan. And I'm not just trying to protect the game.
*One more thing. IMO
-The game is fine with the amount of blood it has.
-No matter if there where fatalities or not, if the fighting is good it's all gravy.
-And they pick a nearly perfect roster with enough familiar characters that people who haven't played Mk in 10 years can walk up and go "Hey I used to Whoop ass with him when I was 9."

Yea, they think it looks bad and they have lost all hope in Midway as a game company. But that is no reason to try and force your opinion upon people by saying "You'll be sorry" and " Don't come crying to me when the game sucks". We all get it, the game might suck it might not. I have agreed with a lot of the stuff people have said on here but the ranters get on my nerves a bit.
*On topic, I think it is wrong for that mag to have a bias reviewer. Thats about it, for all we know the guy could have never played Mk games on his own time. Well clearly seeing as he's a huge street fighter fan. And I'm not just trying to protect the game.
*One more thing. IMO
-The game is fine with the amount of blood it has.
-No matter if there where fatalities or not, if the fighting is good it's all gravy.
-And they pick a nearly perfect roster with enough familiar characters that people who haven't played Mk in 10 years can walk up and go "Hey I used to Whoop ass with him when I was 9."
Yeah Ahnka just likes to troll. There is a HUGE difference between giving one's opinion and trolling.
Let's try an example: Renders
Opinion: I don't like this render because.... I think that they could have ____ instead of ..... I think ____ would have looked better without... This is my least favorable render because... This is my favorite character render because... The detail to the renders look better... The details aren't that great because...
Trolling: WOW, this render is absolutely horrible. Didn't I tell you guys that they would ruin the characters? What the hell did you do to her Boon, looks like a man! This game is gonna suck, and this is just another reason why I won't be buying this crap... maybe rent.
Another example: Fatalities
Opinion: I think they could have done a little more to the Fatalities. I feel they are a bit short and could use some more blood. A few of them were great, but I thought some of them lacked in originality. I liked ___'s because... I didn't really enjoy ____'s because....
Trolling: WOW, these were fatalities? That was the worst shit I've seen in all MK. Boon definitely fucked us all over with this one. NO BLOOD, WTF? NO GORE, WTF? These have absolutely NO originality to them. I had a feeling DC would fuck over MK with this T rating bullshit. Lousy ESRB and DC basically trashed everything that made it an MK game. This game sucks, I don't even wanna rent it anymore.
Anyways, if these were the same crazy people that gave Gears of War 2 a low score, then you should come to expect a score like this. I wouldn't agree to it, though I would use the majority of the votes (from various sites and magazines) as a reference at most. I'd base the final score entirely off my experience with the game.
Let's try an example: Renders
Opinion: I don't like this render because.... I think that they could have ____ instead of ..... I think ____ would have looked better without... This is my least favorable render because... This is my favorite character render because... The detail to the renders look better... The details aren't that great because...
Trolling: WOW, this render is absolutely horrible. Didn't I tell you guys that they would ruin the characters? What the hell did you do to her Boon, looks like a man! This game is gonna suck, and this is just another reason why I won't be buying this crap... maybe rent.
Another example: Fatalities
Opinion: I think they could have done a little more to the Fatalities. I feel they are a bit short and could use some more blood. A few of them were great, but I thought some of them lacked in originality. I liked ___'s because... I didn't really enjoy ____'s because....
Trolling: WOW, these were fatalities? That was the worst shit I've seen in all MK. Boon definitely fucked us all over with this one. NO BLOOD, WTF? NO GORE, WTF? These have absolutely NO originality to them. I had a feeling DC would fuck over MK with this T rating bullshit. Lousy ESRB and DC basically trashed everything that made it an MK game. This game sucks, I don't even wanna rent it anymore.
Anyways, if these were the same crazy people that gave Gears of War 2 a low score, then you should come to expect a score like this. I wouldn't agree to it, though I would use the majority of the votes (from various sites and magazines) as a reference at most. I'd base the final score entirely off my experience with the game.


0
Vomit Wrote:
Yeah Ahnka just likes to troll. There is a HUGE difference between giving one's opinion and trolling.
Let's try an example: Renders
Opinion: I don't like this render because.... I think that they could have ____ instead of ..... I think ____ would have looked better without... This is my least favorable render because... This is my favorite character render because... The detail to the renders look better... The details aren't that great because...
Trolling: WOW, this render is absolutely horrible. Didn't I tell you guys that they would ruin the characters? What the hell did you do to her Boon, looks like a man! This game is gonna suck, and this is just another reason why I won't be buying this crap... maybe rent.
Another example: Fatalities
Opinion: I think they could have done a little more to the Fatalities. I feel they are a bit short and could use some more blood. A few of them were great, but I thought some of them lacked in originality. I liked ___'s because... I didn't really enjoy ____'s because....
Trolling: WOW, these were fatalities? That was the worst shit I've seen in all MK. Boon definitely fucked us all over with this one. NO BLOOD, WTF? NO GORE, WTF? These have absolutely NO originality to them. I had a feeling DC would fuck over MK with this T rating bullshit. Lousy ESRB and DC basically trashed everything that made it an MK game. This game sucks, I don't even wanna rent it anymore.
Anyways, if these were the same crazy people that gave Gears of War 2 a low score, then you should come to expect a score like this. I wouldn't agree to it, though I would use the majority of the votes (from various sites and magazines) as a reference at most. I'd base the final score entirely off my experience with the game.
Yeah Ahnka just likes to troll. There is a HUGE difference between giving one's opinion and trolling.
Let's try an example: Renders
Opinion: I don't like this render because.... I think that they could have ____ instead of ..... I think ____ would have looked better without... This is my least favorable render because... This is my favorite character render because... The detail to the renders look better... The details aren't that great because...
Trolling: WOW, this render is absolutely horrible. Didn't I tell you guys that they would ruin the characters? What the hell did you do to her Boon, looks like a man! This game is gonna suck, and this is just another reason why I won't be buying this crap... maybe rent.
Another example: Fatalities
Opinion: I think they could have done a little more to the Fatalities. I feel they are a bit short and could use some more blood. A few of them were great, but I thought some of them lacked in originality. I liked ___'s because... I didn't really enjoy ____'s because....
Trolling: WOW, these were fatalities? That was the worst shit I've seen in all MK. Boon definitely fucked us all over with this one. NO BLOOD, WTF? NO GORE, WTF? These have absolutely NO originality to them. I had a feeling DC would fuck over MK with this T rating bullshit. Lousy ESRB and DC basically trashed everything that made it an MK game. This game sucks, I don't even wanna rent it anymore.
Anyways, if these were the same crazy people that gave Gears of War 2 a low score, then you should come to expect a score like this. I wouldn't agree to it, though I would use the majority of the votes (from various sites and magazines) as a reference at most. I'd base the final score entirely off my experience with the game.
Speaking the truth is not trolling. If something looks like crap i'm going to state it. I'm not going to say it with alot of fluff. You have NO idea what trolling really is, its not even in the same catagory. Those "examples" you gave are just someone stating their opinions, their not "trolling". You wanna see trolling? THIS is trolling"
BOOONNN FUCKIN SUCKS! I WANNA BURN HIZ ASS UP AND KILLZ HIM AND EAT HIZ BACON WHILR I SCREW HIZ INVISIBLE WIFEZZZ!!!
Thats trolling. So don't play judge when you don't know the case.


0
I think what Ahnka's trying to say is he's not a troll, he's just very simplistic and bad with words.
About Me
What do you like? Hit the Toasty thumbs up on articles and forum posts for a quick response!
0
Did anyone actually stop to think about why the reviewer references Street Fighter? Good grief! Raise your hand if you assume he's blindly loyal to Street Fighter because that's the only kind of fandom you know.
About Me
Determination
0
m0s3pH Wrote:
Get it back on topic.
Get it back on topic.
???
Get rid of the attitude.
Being a mod doesnt mean you can try bullying ppl around.
Just be nice about it dude.
Moseph shoudl have said - Hey guys, Can we please keep this on topic.
About Me

0
chardballz Wrote:
???
Get rid of the attitude.
Being a mod doesnt mean you can try bullying ppl around.
Just be nice about it dude.
Moseph shoudl have said - Hey guys, Can we please keep this on topic.
m0s3pH Wrote:
Get it back on topic.
Get it back on topic.
???
Get rid of the attitude.
Being a mod doesnt mean you can try bullying ppl around.
Just be nice about it dude.
Moseph shoudl have said - Hey guys, Can we please keep this on topic.
I didn't notice the attitude
Anyways, yeah, I think that this UK magazine bashed MK fans in America. I remember reading it on MKO. "US players will think MKA will be the best thing to happen since MAster Chief picked up a second gun." Something like that.
.....
yeah, I don't care about reviews
About Me
What do you like? Hit the Toasty thumbs up on articles and forum posts for a quick response!
0
SubMan799 Wrote:
Anyways, yeah, I think that this UK magazine bashed MK fans in America. I remember reading it on MKO. "US players will think MKA will be the best thing to happen since MAster Chief picked up a second gun." Something like that.
Anyways, yeah, I think that this UK magazine bashed MK fans in America. I remember reading it on MKO. "US players will think MKA will be the best thing to happen since MAster Chief picked up a second gun." Something like that.
Any minute now someone's going to jump out and explain how that's wrong. Probably a Street Fighter fanboy. PSHAW!


0
Yeah, you'd totally have to be a Street Fighter fan to think it's dumb to say "Armageddon will be just as popular as Halo 2 because Americans like all forms of violence equally."


0
Garlador Wrote:
All reviews, both good and bad, are nothing more than glorified reviews.
While general consensus tends to agree on the perks and flaws of most games, that still doesn't mean the game won't be enjoyed by its intended fanbase.
For example, older games like Castlevania: Legacy of Darkness, Hybrid Heaven, and Shadow Hearts got pretty mediocre scores, while I view them as ambitious, amazing, original alternatives to the majority of the mainstream crap most companies put out that I thoroughly enjoyed.
Meanwhile, I think games like Metal Gear Solid 4, Grand Theft Auto 4, and Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion were highly overrated.
Those are my opinions and they hold about as much weight and merit as any other "professional" critic's review score.
All reviews, both good and bad, are nothing more than glorified reviews.
While general consensus tends to agree on the perks and flaws of most games, that still doesn't mean the game won't be enjoyed by its intended fanbase.
For example, older games like Castlevania: Legacy of Darkness, Hybrid Heaven, and Shadow Hearts got pretty mediocre scores, while I view them as ambitious, amazing, original alternatives to the majority of the mainstream crap most companies put out that I thoroughly enjoyed.
Meanwhile, I think games like Metal Gear Solid 4, Grand Theft Auto 4, and Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion were highly overrated.
Those are my opinions and they hold about as much weight and merit as any other "professional" critic's review score.
Quoted for truth.
I don't trust journalist reviews for fighting games because mainstream video game journalists have no fucking clue when it comes to competent fighting game mechanics. Most review fighting games as they would any other genre, as piece of interactive art and often fail to realize that fighting games are not art, they are a science. I trust the fanboase opinions more than I do the journalist and with that being said I cant wait to read mastermalone's review if he feels so inclined to write one.

0
Vomit Wrote:
I'm a big Street Fighter (HURRY THE FUCK UP SF2TURBOHDREMIX & IV) and Tekken (hence my signature-- HURRY THE FUCK UP TEKKEN 6) but I'm just as excited about this game as any other Mortal Kombat fan. With that said... HURRY THE FUCK UP MKvsDC!
I'm a big Street Fighter (HURRY THE FUCK UP SF2TURBOHDREMIX & IV) and Tekken (hence my signature-- HURRY THE FUCK UP TEKKEN 6) but I'm just as excited about this game as any other Mortal Kombat fan. With that said... HURRY THE FUCK UP MKvsDC!
Right on. There's room on my shelf for all 3.

0
There's a thread by Chamelion who has bought the game. U can get an idea of the game from his description. i think he's enjoying it 


0
chardballz Wrote:
???
Get rid of the attitude.
Being a mod doesnt mean you can try bullying ppl around.
Just be nice about it dude.
Moseph shoudl have said - Hey guys, Can we please keep this on topic.
m0s3pH Wrote:
Get it back on topic.
Get it back on topic.
???
Get rid of the attitude.
Being a mod doesnt mean you can try bullying ppl around.
Just be nice about it dude.
Moseph shoudl have said - Hey guys, Can we please keep this on topic.
Exactly, being a mod dosen't mean you're our legal gardian. I'm a grown adult and don't need to be told what to do. Also we were on topic, off topic is if we were freaking talking about Madonna's new CD.
© 1998-2025 Shadow Knight Media, LLC. All rights reserved. Mortal Kombat, the dragon logo and all character names are trademarks and copyright of Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.