1. McKellen > all.

2. Grow the fuck up.

1. Your opinion.

2. Ease the fuck up.

It seemed to me you were trivializing sex into something that's "no big deal."

Plus, boring though they may be, they're also necessary.

Sex sucks. Don't listen to the demons in your crotch! Repent! Repent!

Im very appreciative that many of you took the time to address this topic. I'm just intrigued by the way people think about the homosexual population (myslef included) as for you who people who many call "bigots" I really dont care what you think, you dont have to like homosexuality and you may totally disagree with it but if the person is really cool, that shouldn't stop you from liking him or her. Anywho just interesting to hear peoples opinions. Most people at first meeting me think I'm str8. I suppsoe thats why I have so many friends. Because I have alot of friends and im not steryotyped as the typical "gay". W/e jsut be who you are I dont act any different because I'm gay. But yep thats what I got to say. See ya later peoples.

what shingo said and

how long has hetrosexuals thrown their "straightness" in my face?

watch every tv show, go to the movies, park, resturants, mall and so many other places and see hetro folks kissing, gropping, holding hands and stuff like that.
the media talking about how billy bob and mary sue got married today.
Now thats throwing it in my face, every day for all 27 years of my life.

how is the media shoving "gayness" in your face?

there was but one tv show that had gay leads (even tho the actors themselves are str8, and the show has run its course).

1 big time movie. not much else.

now are you saying because you were walking in the mall and you seen 2 guys holding hands, is that throwing it in your face? WTF?? what about those 500 str8 couples to that ONE gay couple.


my point is, their is no parading of gayness. its just an issuse that most evolved human beings are getting over w/.
which is why your seeing more of it on public.



you know what, my bad i should have stop paying attention after reading this

"have you seen the children of parents of differing racial backgrounds? Their offspring often turn out to be the best looking people."

your full of sterotypes and postulation myself along w/ many others are wasting their time even reading your posts.




kinda funny, i have yet to meet a gay guy that has ever done that. i myself have never done that. BUT its assumed that every one is str8. THIS IS WHY SOME FOLKS FEEL THE NEED TO SHARE IT. if we werent assumed "str8" then no one would ever feel compelled to do so. understand now?




why is my being funny being compared to being flamboyant?

i stated that im gay so others who may be gay themselves would go "oh how kool hes gay like myself". kinda like saying

"hi my name is dan and i like Mortal kombat"

dude "no way"
dan "way"
dude "i love mortal kombat too"
dan "fucking awesome, lets discuss"



understand?

again we are all assumed straight. that why i felt compelled to share that i was gay. if i didnt do that i prolly wouldnt have gotten to know a bunch of folks on this site.



wouldnt you be just a little pissed if, you met this girl and she was so pretty in your eyes.
well you talk w/ her often, see her every day. she enjoys your company, she enjoys yours. your main purpose to get close to this girl was to ask her out and possibly start dating.
you have fallen in love, you then ask if she'd go on a date w/ you, she says "omg, i dont see you like that, im gay".
your crushed, you just wasted a month of your life trying to get w/ this girl and shes gay. you could have been spared of heart ache if she had just let you know she was gay.

if only every one wasnt assumed straight. we wouldnt feel the need to share it.

"wouldnt you be just a little pissed if, you met this girl and she was so pretty in your eyes.
well you talk w/ her often, see her every day. she enjoys your company, she enjoys yours. your main purpose to get close to this girl was to ask her out and possibly start dating.
you have fallen in love, you then ask if she'd go on a date w/ you, she says "omg, i dont see you like that, im gay".
your crushed, you just wasted a month of your life trying to get w/ this girl and shes gay. you could have been spared of heart ache if she had just let you know she was gay."
I don't date. I'm an asexual, antisocial, autistic recluse, but your point is made.
Glad you were civil about it, everything you said makes sense.

That atcually did happen to a female friend of mine, except that she invested three months into getting the courage to ask him out on a date; when she finally got him alone and asked him to go with her for a cup of coffee, he replied "only if we go as friends because I'm gay."
I know she kicked herself really hard (a. k. a. got smashed after that).

You thought wrong. Frankly, that didn't suprise me.






Not really. Were just led to believe they are.

6 pages in just over a day. Damn.
Discrimination and prejudice against anyone is pathetic. That should pretty much explain my views.

But we've got to discriminate against the cannibals.

Soz cannibal.

See, you are confusing the issue, this is the misconception the majority who preach advocacy of homosexuality have.
I have nothing against individuals, the people themselves. I have contempt for the choice they've made, and the fact that they cannot see it is not right, on both moral and physical grounds.
No one bar Shingo has bothered to address majin and myself's argument that same-sex sex is not biologically correct. That male and female genitalia are designed specificaly to work together, and together only - there is no contesting that fact.

That's no different then if some girl who you thought was the fugliest person ever tapped you in the ass. You're not attracted to them. And I dont see how you could be against something that has no effect on you whatsoever.

Well, I confess I'm 50/50 with people who speak ambiguously.



Stable relationships are necessary for stable families. Unless, of course, you want to live with a miserable spouse and miserable children, I guess that's your prerogative.

Exactly.



It's useless. We keep providing proof and reasons to justify our standpoints, and yet all the homosexuals have to say is (on a basic, blunt level) "If it feels good, go ahead and do it." Whether it does or doesn't bother me (and it does) isn't the issue, but the thread question that was asked. Just about no homos have provided any clear and concise reasons beyond that.
Morons and hedonists. I'm done, I'll respond if needed.

It is wrong men marry women, women marry men. Two men should not fornicate together and neither should women. If every one did that the human race would go extinct, like reptile

Please explain why you think homosexuality is a choice. I honestly find it dispicable that anyone who isn't gay--and thus would have no way of really knowing first-hand--would make such an assumption.

I don't know if people are actually born gay, but there's no doubt in my mind that calling homosexuality a choice is at best a grievous oversimplification. Why would any rational person make such a choice when so much stigma is attached to it?


Why does it matter whether or not it's "biologically correct"? Oral sex between a straight couple certainly isn't biologically correct, but I don't know many straight people who haven't either given or received it. Even in traditional sex, the penis wasn't designed to be covered by a condom; do you have an objection to the use of condoms? Suppose I never want to have children, but my girlfriend and I have an overwhelming desire to express our love sexually. Would you find it morally wrong for us to use a condom? If not, how is that any different from homosexuality? Granted, the parts are naturally designed to fit, but it's still subverting nature by preventing conception.

That line just wasted your whole argument and wasn't needed for you to state your opinion.

I get a skull for saying moron, yet you have people like Nikodemus getting away with intentional antagonism.
Goddamn Jerrod, you were just waiting for a chance eh? Whatever helps you sleep at night.

Look up one post above the one you just made. In case you forgot, name-calling is not tolerated here and gets skulls for it.
Antagonism happens, get over it; he's not flaming you, you shouldn't flame him. You shouldn't even let the antagonising get to you the way it does.

Look up partisan in the dictionary, and I swear it'll have a nice headshot of you.

The skulls don't bother me, this website isn't life or death to me. It's the principles of why that do. At least you said why. Delete this if you wish(that's what you do), I'll know you read it. I'm done.

People should be more concerned about the opposite scenario. At its current growth rate, the earth can't sustain can't sustain the human population for more than another century. Personally, I've decided never to have children on ethical grounds: I don't believe the creation of another human being--especially in America, with our gluttonous per capita consumption rates--can be justified. If you honestly think such a decision is going to contribute to the extinction of the human race, you are seriously deluded; if anything, a moderately large number of people refraining from procreation will make the human population more sustainable, and improve the overall quality of life.

Drop it Majin, the skull was deserved. Anymore side conversations will be skulled. Keep this respectful, and on topic.