

0
Well, size does matter, at least partially. I've had some bad sex with men who are well endowed from not having a clue what they're doing but at the very least you'd feel something, I can't say I've ever had amazing sex with someone who hasn't got enough to work with either. You'd need at least something over 5" to really feel anything, technique is the deciding factor when it comes to an orgasm but the relevance of width and length shouldn't be dismissed either.
You could have all the technique in the world but if your drill can't mine that cave, get your hard hat off.
You could have all the technique in the world but if your drill can't mine that cave, get your hard hat off.


About Me
Get that ass BANNED
0
This might sound a bit homo, but when me and my mom left winco a couple minutes ago, while we were driving to the driveway to get out, we past this beautiful looking guy. I mean he had the body, the face, the perfect haircut and facial hair, and he had a sharp look to his eyes. I'm sure he made women gush and gay men hard the moment they made eye contact with him. Why the shit is he working in Winco as a cashier in SPOKANE? With his looks, motherfucker should be in god damn Hollywood makin bank. Damn. Too bad women up here can't make me talk about them as much as I did with this guy. Sheesh.
Oh, and I bought raspberry arizona today. Stuff is goooood. Tried to get some tits on webcam. Failed, but I did get her to grab, squish, and lots of cleavage. Since I spent the whole night on that and its now 8am. Its time for bed.
Oh, and I bought raspberry arizona today. Stuff is goooood. Tried to get some tits on webcam. Failed, but I did get her to grab, squish, and lots of cleavage. Since I spent the whole night on that and its now 8am. Its time for bed.
Jerrod Wrote:
None of that works, and anyone who believs that the pills make you bigger than you already are is a fool. Surgery's the only way to increase the size permanently.
m0s3pH Wrote:
... they make pills for that. Why the fuck would anyone go through with that procedure?
Jerrod Wrote:
Make your cock look bigger.
m0s3pH Wrote:
I'm afraid to ask, but what benefit could that surgery possibly have?
(Erik) Wrote:
I just saw a frightening surgery. It involving stuffing your penis like a sausage with fat that has been removed from your butt.
I just saw a frightening surgery. It involving stuffing your penis like a sausage with fat that has been removed from your butt.
I'm afraid to ask, but what benefit could that surgery possibly have?
Make your cock look bigger.
... they make pills for that. Why the fuck would anyone go through with that procedure?
None of that works, and anyone who believs that the pills make you bigger than you already are is a fool. Surgery's the only way to increase the size permanently.
Eating chicken, avoiding smoking that decreases overall growing up and gives impotence and working out in your teenage years affect the most.
The size barely matters though, as long as it's not reeeeaally tiny. Even the size of a Snickers bar should work. It's about whether you use it for any other cause than peeing in the first place. (Be responsible however!)1. Birth (genes)
2. Puberty (lifestyle)
3. Surgery (don't go there)
0
NoobSaibot5 Wrote:
Well, size does matter, at least partially. I've had some bad sex with men who are well endowed from not having a clue what they're doing but at the very least you'd feel something, I can't say I've ever had amazing sex with someone who hasn't got enough to work with either. You'd need at least something over 5" to really feel anything, technique is the deciding factor when it comes to an orgasm but the relevance of width and length shouldn't be dismissed either.
You could have all the technique in the world but if your drill can't mine that cave, get your hard hat off.
Well, size does matter, at least partially. I've had some bad sex with men who are well endowed from not having a clue what they're doing but at the very least you'd feel something, I can't say I've ever had amazing sex with someone who hasn't got enough to work with either. You'd need at least something over 5" to really feel anything, technique is the deciding factor when it comes to an orgasm but the relevance of width and length shouldn't be dismissed either.
You could have all the technique in the world but if your drill can't mine that cave, get your hard hat off.
Maybe your mine has just become too big? XD
No, but seriously, I've had some great sex with a guy who didn't have much to work with, but that was because he knew how to use what he had. I get what you're saying though, too big and too small are both bad. There's not much those guys can do about it though, unless you have enough money to get some surgery, and even then it is minimal what difference can be made.
I take it your are a bottom from what you say, or at least versatile, but remember that you also should work with what you have on that department. There are excersizes that can be done to avoid being too "flabby", if you get what I mean, which is just as important to get the most out of the experience.
About Me

0
I had a weird dream that Mark Henry became a Mortal Kombat character


0
Seth Killian joined Sony Santa Monica Studios. Wonder if he will do any work on PASBR? I know he is going to be at EVO showing it off.
About Me

0
Icebaby Wrote:
I advise everyone to go see Ted. The ending is hysterical.
I advise everyone to go see Ted. The ending is hysterical.
Flash! Ahah!
Jerrod Wrote:
None of that works, and anyone who believs that the pills make you bigger than you already are is a fool. Surgery's the only way to increase the size permanently.
m0s3pH Wrote:
... they make pills for that. Why the fuck would anyone go through with that procedure?
Jerrod Wrote:
Make your cock look bigger.
m0s3pH Wrote:
I'm afraid to ask, but what benefit could that surgery possibly have?
(Erik) Wrote:
I just saw a frightening surgery. It involving stuffing your penis like a sausage with fat that has been removed from your butt.
I just saw a frightening surgery. It involving stuffing your penis like a sausage with fat that has been removed from your butt.
I'm afraid to ask, but what benefit could that surgery possibly have?
Make your cock look bigger.
... they make pills for that. Why the fuck would anyone go through with that procedure?
None of that works, and anyone who believs that the pills make you bigger than you already are is a fool. Surgery's the only way to increase the size permanently.
There is also something called jelqing which sounds scary to me, but who knows maybe I just never looked into it.
Size matters as much as height matters as much as appearance matters as much as everything matters. It's not the end all of everything, but it definitely might shape perceptions and strengths and weaknesses in yourself as a partner. The documentary was about penis size, and I thought the main guy was just as insecure as every guy who doesn't have naked man friends and compares himself constantly to porn, but ... he was literally only 3.5 inches erect and when you see it it really puts into perspective that we're all probably more well off than we think we are.


0
Jaded-Raven Wrote:
Maybe your mine has just become too big? XD
No, but seriously, I've had some great sex with a guy who didn't have much to work with, but that was because he knew how to use what he had. I get what you're saying though, too big and too small are both bad. There's not much those guys can do about it though, unless you have enough money to get some surgery, and even then it is minimal what difference can be made.
I take it your are a bottom from what you say, or at least versatile, but remember that you also should work with what you have on that department. There are excersizes that can be done to avoid being too "flabby", if you get what I mean, which is just as important to get the most out of the experience.
NoobSaibot5 Wrote:
Well, size does matter, at least partially. I've had some bad sex with men who are well endowed from not having a clue what they're doing but at the very least you'd feel something, I can't say I've ever had amazing sex with someone who hasn't got enough to work with either. You'd need at least something over 5" to really feel anything, technique is the deciding factor when it comes to an orgasm but the relevance of width and length shouldn't be dismissed either.
You could have all the technique in the world but if your drill can't mine that cave, get your hard hat off.
Well, size does matter, at least partially. I've had some bad sex with men who are well endowed from not having a clue what they're doing but at the very least you'd feel something, I can't say I've ever had amazing sex with someone who hasn't got enough to work with either. You'd need at least something over 5" to really feel anything, technique is the deciding factor when it comes to an orgasm but the relevance of width and length shouldn't be dismissed either.
You could have all the technique in the world but if your drill can't mine that cave, get your hard hat off.
Maybe your mine has just become too big? XD
No, but seriously, I've had some great sex with a guy who didn't have much to work with, but that was because he knew how to use what he had. I get what you're saying though, too big and too small are both bad. There's not much those guys can do about it though, unless you have enough money to get some surgery, and even then it is minimal what difference can be made.
I take it your are a bottom from what you say, or at least versatile, but remember that you also should work with what you have on that department. There are excersizes that can be done to avoid being too "flabby", if you get what I mean, which is just as important to get the most out of the experience.
I loled so hard at that first line! XD
Oh I do my excercises, everyone should. But then again I don't have that much sex at all lately, and the last guy who I was meeting up for sex with turned out to be a complete prick so I'll probably go barren for a few months now.
*tumbleweeds and sandstorms in the land of Sexual Encounters*
Gone were the days I was 19, comfortably rich, carefree and a drunken ass hoe.
0
I like where this is going
Okay, this conversation has been confusing the outright piss out of me. I'm not trying to sound judgemental or snide here, I'll admit I'm simply ignorant. What has me confused between you two is that you are both men, but you are talking about your "mines" and "drill size".
Again, I'll admit I'm ignorant, and personally I don't want to find out, but due to the number of gay friends I have I'm surprised I never asked this before.
How is size between two men just as important to sex between a man and a woman, when most doctors/kinky females/masturbators are able to reach the prostate with just their fingers, which are notably shorter than a penis?
Again, I'm not trying to sound snide by saying "STR8 PEEPOLE ARE MORE TALENTED" or anything, this is a genuine question born from this convo.
I guess TLDR, vaginas are much more complicated than assholes, so why should size be such a factor to sex to gay men? I can understand maybe the aesthetic attraction you may have to it, but idek what is happening in this thread.
Also..erm...the sex thread got shut down..so sorry if this is pushing it lol.
Again, I'll admit I'm ignorant, and personally I don't want to find out, but due to the number of gay friends I have I'm surprised I never asked this before.
How is size between two men just as important to sex between a man and a woman, when most doctors/kinky females/masturbators are able to reach the prostate with just their fingers, which are notably shorter than a penis?
Again, I'm not trying to sound snide by saying "STR8 PEEPOLE ARE MORE TALENTED" or anything, this is a genuine question born from this convo.
I guess TLDR, vaginas are much more complicated than assholes, so why should size be such a factor to sex to gay men? I can understand maybe the aesthetic attraction you may have to it, but idek what is happening in this thread.
Also..erm...the sex thread got shut down..so sorry if this is pushing it lol.
0
yo how big yo dick nohomo


0
dibula Wrote:
Okay, this conversation has been confusing the outright piss out of me. I'm not trying to sound judgemental or snide here, I'll admit I'm simply ignorant. What has me confused between you two is that you are both men, but you are talking about your "mines" and "drill size".
Again, I'll admit I'm ignorant, and personally I don't want to find out, but due to the number of gay friends I have I'm surprised I never asked this before.
How is size between two men just as important to sex between a man and a woman, when most doctors/kinky females/masturbators are able to reach the prostate with just their fingers, which are notably shorter than a penis?
Again, I'm not trying to sound snide by saying "STR8 PEEPOLE ARE MORE TALENTED" or anything, this is a genuine question born from this convo.
I guess TLDR, vaginas are much more complicated than assholes, so why should size be such a factor to sex to gay men? I can understand maybe the aesthetic attraction you may have to it, but idek what is happening in this thread.
Also..erm...the sex thread got shut down..so sorry if this is pushing it lol.
Okay, this conversation has been confusing the outright piss out of me. I'm not trying to sound judgemental or snide here, I'll admit I'm simply ignorant. What has me confused between you two is that you are both men, but you are talking about your "mines" and "drill size".
Again, I'll admit I'm ignorant, and personally I don't want to find out, but due to the number of gay friends I have I'm surprised I never asked this before.
How is size between two men just as important to sex between a man and a woman, when most doctors/kinky females/masturbators are able to reach the prostate with just their fingers, which are notably shorter than a penis?
Again, I'm not trying to sound snide by saying "STR8 PEEPOLE ARE MORE TALENTED" or anything, this is a genuine question born from this convo.
I guess TLDR, vaginas are much more complicated than assholes, so why should size be such a factor to sex to gay men? I can understand maybe the aesthetic attraction you may have to it, but idek what is happening in this thread.
Also..erm...the sex thread got shut down..so sorry if this is pushing it lol.
Two things.
First, you're asking a question then saying you're not sure if you want the answer. So I'm not even too sure if I'm supposed to answer this now or not.
Second, the g-spot in a woman and the p-spot in a man are completely different.
Spoilers: (Highlight to reveal)
The gspot's biologically located behind the pubic bone at the back of the Urehthral (in a somewhat curved direction), whilst the Prostate is located just below the bladder and behind the pubic bone for males.
The gspot's biologically located behind the pubic bone at the back of the Urehthral (in a somewhat curved direction), whilst the Prostate is located just below the bladder and behind the pubic bone for males.
From my understanding,
Spoilers: (Highlight to reveal)
the prostate can be reached and touched by a finger, but to experience an orgasm with it it needs to be stimulated (and not just from being touched once or twice by a doctor, something needs to be touching off it consistently in a rhythmic pattern for it to be aroused and ultimately lead to an orgasm). The G-spot with women functions similarly, it becomes more prominent and noticeable depending on levels of arousal.
the prostate can be reached and touched by a finger, but to experience an orgasm with it it needs to be stimulated (and not just from being touched once or twice by a doctor, something needs to be touching off it consistently in a rhythmic pattern for it to be aroused and ultimately lead to an orgasm). The G-spot with women functions similarly, it becomes more prominent and noticeable depending on levels of arousal.
As a rule of thumb, I'm not interested in Vagina's, so I could be totally wrong with that one, but
Spoilers: (Highlight to reveal)
from what I understand with both the prostate and the g-spot is that they both need to be stimulated for prolonged periods to reach an orgasm.
Hence why gay men and straight women may make the comment that size is a relative factor. from what I understand with both the prostate and the g-spot is that they both need to be stimulated for prolonged periods to reach an orgasm.
Spoilers: (Highlight to reveal)
You need something to reach it and touch off it easily (which in sex, there's a ryhtym with your body going back and forth, and a small penis runs the risk of slipping out or failing to reach it).
You need something to reach it and touch off it easily (which in sex, there's a ryhtym with your body going back and forth, and a small penis runs the risk of slipping out or failing to reach it).
I know that fear of the unknown can often result in people coming across as a little bit ignorant or uninformed, but I see no reason why it can't be discussed maturely. We all have genitals, we're all human, and we all have our primal urges. Plus we're on a forum where characters wear provocative clothing, shoot fireballs from their hands and rip each others guts out, so why a subject that's more grounded in reality can't be discussed perplexes me.
0
what is this land of sexual encounters of which you speak?
be happy you can get some at all, others of us aren't so fortunate.
be happy you can get some at all, others of us aren't so fortunate.
0
ya guise not everyones can have teh sex
0
NoobSaibot5 Wrote:
Well, size does matter, at least partially. I've had some bad sex with men who are well endowed from not having a clue what they're doing but at the very least you'd feel something, I can't say I've ever had amazing sex with someone who hasn't got enough to work with either. You'd need at least something over 5" to really feel anything, technique is the deciding factor when it comes to an orgasm but the relevance of width and length shouldn't be dismissed either.
You could have all the technique in the world but if your drill can't mine that cave, get your hard hat off.
Well, size does matter, at least partially. I've had some bad sex with men who are well endowed from not having a clue what they're doing but at the very least you'd feel something, I can't say I've ever had amazing sex with someone who hasn't got enough to work with either. You'd need at least something over 5" to really feel anything, technique is the deciding factor when it comes to an orgasm but the relevance of width and length shouldn't be dismissed either.
You could have all the technique in the world but if your drill can't mine that cave, get your hard hat off.
Now this concerns me, I've in the wonderful position of not only sporting a small dick, but on top of that I'm stuck with medical conditions that keep me from having any real semblance of muscle or energy.
Am I doomed to a life of pleasure giving inability?
0
how small


0
FlamingTP Wrote:
Now this concerns me, I've in the wonderful position of not only sporting a small dick, but on top of that I'm stuck with medical conditions that keep me from having any real semblance of muscle or energy.
Am I doomed to a life of pleasure giving inability?
NoobSaibot5 Wrote:
Well, size does matter, at least partially. I've had some bad sex with men who are well endowed from not having a clue what they're doing but at the very least you'd feel something, I can't say I've ever had amazing sex with someone who hasn't got enough to work with either. You'd need at least something over 5" to really feel anything, technique is the deciding factor when it comes to an orgasm but the relevance of width and length shouldn't be dismissed either.
You could have all the technique in the world but if your drill can't mine that cave, get your hard hat off.
Well, size does matter, at least partially. I've had some bad sex with men who are well endowed from not having a clue what they're doing but at the very least you'd feel something, I can't say I've ever had amazing sex with someone who hasn't got enough to work with either. You'd need at least something over 5" to really feel anything, technique is the deciding factor when it comes to an orgasm but the relevance of width and length shouldn't be dismissed either.
You could have all the technique in the world but if your drill can't mine that cave, get your hard hat off.
Now this concerns me, I've in the wonderful position of not only sporting a small dick, but on top of that I'm stuck with medical conditions that keep me from having any real semblance of muscle or energy.
Am I doomed to a life of pleasure giving inability?
Of course you're not. Did I ever say you were doomed? Did I ever mention, even once, that pleasure is impossible to achieve if you lack in the downstairs department?
I was only speaking from my own perspective there, my opinion on pleasure and sex isn't an absolute and you know that. I would have thought my last sentence in that post would have suggested I was being humerous about my own views but apparently not, at the very least Jaded understood the context I was speaking in. Though something tells me I've backed myself into a corner here and people are going to start twisting my words and losing it because god forbid I brought the subject of sex up and aired an opinion on it.
The fault is mine for not wording that post better, but with all due respect I did say in my post that technique would be the necessity but the values of length and width shouldn't be discredited either. All I've offered is my own personal views and preferences, not the defining law of all things erotic.
0
width > length
0
NoobSaibot5 Wrote:
Of course you're not. Did I ever say you were doomed? Did I ever mention, even once, that pleasure is impossible to achieve if you lack in the downstairs department?
I was only speaking from my own perspective there, my opinion on pleasure and sex isn't an absolute and you know that. I would have thought my last sentence in that post would have suggested I was being humerous about my own views but apparently not, at the very least Jaded understood the context I was speaking in. Though something tells me I've backed myself into a corner here and people are going to start twisting my words and losing it because god forbid I brought the subject of sex up and aired an opinion on it.
The fault is mine for not wording that post better, but with all due respect I did say in my post that technique would be the necessity but the values of length and width shouldn't be discredited either. All I've offered is my own personal views and preferences, not the defining law of all things erotic.
Of course you're not. Did I ever say you were doomed? Did I ever mention, even once, that pleasure is impossible to achieve if you lack in the downstairs department?
I was only speaking from my own perspective there, my opinion on pleasure and sex isn't an absolute and you know that. I would have thought my last sentence in that post would have suggested I was being humerous about my own views but apparently not, at the very least Jaded understood the context I was speaking in. Though something tells me I've backed myself into a corner here and people are going to start twisting my words and losing it because god forbid I brought the subject of sex up and aired an opinion on it.
The fault is mine for not wording that post better, but with all due respect I did say in my post that technique would be the necessity but the values of length and width shouldn't be discredited either. All I've offered is my own personal views and preferences, not the defining law of all things erotic.
a question isn't an attack on your perspective, I didn't view anything said to be hostile either. I'm just not sure if this is a legitimate issue I need to be worried about in life or not.
UNdiscovered Wrote:
ya guise not everyones can have teh sex
ya guise not everyones can have teh sex
Sure they can! My sex is male.

FlamingTP Wrote:
Now this concerns me, I've in the wonderful position of not only sporting a small dick, but on top of that I'm stuck with medical conditions that keep me from having any real semblance of muscle or energy.
Am I doomed to a life of pleasure giving inability?
Now this concerns me, I've in the wonderful position of not only sporting a small dick, but on top of that I'm stuck with medical conditions that keep me from having any real semblance of muscle or energy.
Am I doomed to a life of pleasure giving inability?
This is what concerned me about this topic, which is also why I'd have preferred not to necessarily have this conversation. When we're talking about big dicks, people need to realize that the majority of talkers do not have big dicks. For one, if everyone in the world won a million dollars in lottery, would everyone be rich? Of course not. It applies to here as well.
Nonetheless, the size should not concern you because there's not much a thing to do about it. NoobSaibot5 didn't want to insult anybody. On the bright side, you can always be a big dick without having one. Not.
In other news, UlcaTron got a raise at work and he's satisfied. Hooray!
© 1998-2025 Shadow Knight Media, LLC. All rights reserved. Mortal Kombat, the dragon logo and all character names are trademarks and copyright of Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.