0
Sub-Zero


About Me

0
Sub-Zero
Also, please start being more specific. You weren't specific about King in the match before last. And you weren't specific about which Kuma it is. There's two Kings; King the first (Tekken 1 and 2) or King the second (Tekken 3-5). There's two Kumas. Kuma the first (Tekken 1 and 2) or Kuma the second (Tekken 3-5).
Also, please start being more specific. You weren't specific about King in the match before last. And you weren't specific about which Kuma it is. There's two Kings; King the first (Tekken 1 and 2) or King the second (Tekken 3-5). There's two Kumas. Kuma the first (Tekken 1 and 2) or Kuma the second (Tekken 3-5).


About Me

0
Bloodline666 Wrote:
Sub-Zero
Also, please start being more specific. You weren't specific about King in the match before last. And you weren't specific about which Kuma it is. There's two Kings; King the first (Tekken 1 and 2) or King the second (Tekken 3-5). There's two Kumas. Kuma the first (Tekken 1 and 2) or Kuma the second (Tekken 3-5).
Sub-Zero
Also, please start being more specific. You weren't specific about King in the match before last. And you weren't specific about which Kuma it is. There's two Kings; King the first (Tekken 1 and 2) or King the second (Tekken 3-5). There's two Kumas. Kuma the first (Tekken 1 and 2) or Kuma the second (Tekken 3-5).
I think I am pretty much specific. If I said King 2 then I would state it but it was King the first since it was only KING. As for Kuma...it didn't state it was Kuma the second so therefor, wut is it? Kuma the first. The first game of Mortal Kombat wasn't called MORTAL KOMBAT 1, it was simply called Mortal Kombat. Which is what I am doing here. I think I only wasn't very specific with the Ogre. It was the Mayan version which I completely forgot to put.
There will the no SECOND's in this tournament. Roger Jr. will be in this tournament but not the others. So let's leave it at that ...
PrtgStevo88 Wrote:
I think I am pretty much specific. If I said King 2 then I would state it but it was King the first since it was only KING. As for Kuma...it didn't state it was Kuma the second so therefor, wut is it? Kuma the first. The first game of Mortal Kombat wasn't called MORTAL KOMBAT 1, it was simply called Mortal Kombat. Which is what I am doing here. I think I only wasn't very specific with the Ogre. It was the Mayan version which I completely forgot to put.
There will the no SECOND's in this tournament. Roger Jr. will be in this tournament but not the others. So let's leave it at that ...
Bloodline666 Wrote:
Sub-Zero
Also, please start being more specific. You weren't specific about King in the match before last. And you weren't specific about which Kuma it is. There's two Kings; King the first (Tekken 1 and 2) or King the second (Tekken 3-5). There's two Kumas. Kuma the first (Tekken 1 and 2) or Kuma the second (Tekken 3-5).
Sub-Zero
Also, please start being more specific. You weren't specific about King in the match before last. And you weren't specific about which Kuma it is. There's two Kings; King the first (Tekken 1 and 2) or King the second (Tekken 3-5). There's two Kumas. Kuma the first (Tekken 1 and 2) or Kuma the second (Tekken 3-5).
I think I am pretty much specific. If I said King 2 then I would state it but it was King the first since it was only KING. As for Kuma...it didn't state it was Kuma the second so therefor, wut is it? Kuma the first. The first game of Mortal Kombat wasn't called MORTAL KOMBAT 1, it was simply called Mortal Kombat. Which is what I am doing here. I think I only wasn't very specific with the Ogre. It was the Mayan version which I completely forgot to put.
There will the no SECOND's in this tournament. Roger Jr. will be in this tournament but not the others. So let's leave it at that ...
Well since a lot of people are under the misconception that not only is tekkens storyline not as good as mk's they are also under the impression that there isn't a story at all beyond a tournament thats held. In reality the "tournament" isn't even a major part of the story and there is quite a back story on all the characters. That being said Most people don't know there are two kings or two kumas or two rogers even two laws. It's a natural question to ask and really if you want to compare the two it's not really fair king the second is a million times better than king the first ever was same can be said for most of the seconds. It would be like comparing mk 1 liu kang to ultimate mk 3 liu kang.


About Me

0
1TruKing Wrote:
Well since a lot of people are under the misconception that not only is tekkens storyline not as good as mk's they are also under the impression that there isn't a story at all beyond a tournament thats held. In reality the "tournament" isn't even a major part of the story and there is quite a back story on all the characters. That being said Most people don't know there are two kings or two kumas or two rogers even two laws. It's a natural question to ask and really if you want to compare the two it's not really fair king the second is a million times better than king the first ever was same can be said for most of the seconds. It would be like comparing mk 1 liu kang to ultimate mk 3 liu kang.
PrtgStevo88 Wrote:
I think I am pretty much specific. If I said King 2 then I would state it but it was King the first since it was only KING. As for Kuma...it didn't state it was Kuma the second so therefor, wut is it? Kuma the first. The first game of Mortal Kombat wasn't called MORTAL KOMBAT 1, it was simply called Mortal Kombat. Which is what I am doing here. I think I only wasn't very specific with the Ogre. It was the Mayan version which I completely forgot to put.
There will the no SECOND's in this tournament. Roger Jr. will be in this tournament but not the others. So let's leave it at that ...
Bloodline666 Wrote:
Sub-Zero
Also, please start being more specific. You weren't specific about King in the match before last. And you weren't specific about which Kuma it is. There's two Kings; King the first (Tekken 1 and 2) or King the second (Tekken 3-5). There's two Kumas. Kuma the first (Tekken 1 and 2) or Kuma the second (Tekken 3-5).
Sub-Zero
Also, please start being more specific. You weren't specific about King in the match before last. And you weren't specific about which Kuma it is. There's two Kings; King the first (Tekken 1 and 2) or King the second (Tekken 3-5). There's two Kumas. Kuma the first (Tekken 1 and 2) or Kuma the second (Tekken 3-5).
I think I am pretty much specific. If I said King 2 then I would state it but it was King the first since it was only KING. As for Kuma...it didn't state it was Kuma the second so therefor, wut is it? Kuma the first. The first game of Mortal Kombat wasn't called MORTAL KOMBAT 1, it was simply called Mortal Kombat. Which is what I am doing here. I think I only wasn't very specific with the Ogre. It was the Mayan version which I completely forgot to put.
There will the no SECOND's in this tournament. Roger Jr. will be in this tournament but not the others. So let's leave it at that ...
Well since a lot of people are under the misconception that not only is tekkens storyline not as good as mk's they are also under the impression that there isn't a story at all beyond a tournament thats held. In reality the "tournament" isn't even a major part of the story and there is quite a back story on all the characters. That being said Most people don't know there are two kings or two kumas or two rogers even two laws. It's a natural question to ask and really if you want to compare the two it's not really fair king the second is a million times better than king the first ever was same can be said for most of the seconds. It would be like comparing mk 1 liu kang to ultimate mk 3 liu kang.
Hmm...u got a good point there. Well, now u got me thinking if i should add the second's. In all reality, King the second is much better then King the first so u do have a point there. I'm going to have to sleep on it but I want to know what you all think.
Should this tournament have King 2 and Kuma Jr (or Kuma 2)? It doesn't really matter to me.
As of now, I am not quite sure if I want to put Violet (which is prettty much Lee) and Dr. B since they are both really not important characters but I still have many Mortal KOmbat Characters left over so the decision is up to u. I am not aware of two laws so maybe someone wants to explain that to me.
So while placing your vote, please tell me whether or not I should add these characters. Thank You 1TruKing for giving me the idea!
0
Sub-Zero

0
Kuma is the big bear right? Just a novelty character, but in reality would crush a human since thats what bears do. You don't want to run into a beast like that they are pretty killer so I say Kuma. Also bears that big are very strong and durable he could withstand a lot of attack from Sub-Zero and then rip him to pieces and maul him to death with his massive claws and teeth. Unless Kuma is just a cutesy cuddely teddy bear, but he looks pretty fierce to me. I don't think Sub-Zeros freezing power would be of any use here.
Kuma.
Kuma.

0
I think the Ice blast would kill Kuma easy.
Sub-zero would win because of the Ice blast.
Sub-zero would win because of the Ice blast.


About Me
0
Subzero
0
Sub Zero, simply because I hate Kuma.
Kuma is, conceptually, the worst Tekken character ever, in my opinion. Right up there with Gon.
I HATE kuma! HATE HIM!
...Stupid f+1.
Kuma is, conceptually, the worst Tekken character ever, in my opinion. Right up there with Gon.
I HATE kuma! HATE HIM!
...Stupid f+1.


About Me
Mortal Kombat Nexus Online By Pakistani
0
Sub-zer vs Kuma hav u gone mad Sub-zero is king and kuma is begger Scoprion and sub-zero they both beat tekken all character according to storyline and may be game play


About Me
Mortal Kombat Nexus Online By Pakistani
0
Sub-zer vs Kuma hav u gone mad Sub-zero is king and kuma is begger Scoprion and sub-zero they both beat tekken all character according to storyline and may be game play
0
MKRAYDEN Wrote:
Sub-zer vs Kuma hav u gone mad Sub-zero is king and kuma is begger Scoprion and sub-zero they both beat tekken all character according to storyline and may be game play
Sub-zer vs Kuma hav u gone mad Sub-zero is king and kuma is begger Scoprion and sub-zero they both beat tekken all character according to storyline and may be game play
Can we ignore that "Scoprion and sub-zero they both beat tekken all character according to storyline and may be game play" part? I just know people are going to reply to that, and the actual purpose of voting on characters will be lost amongst 100 posts full of a lot of facts people don't understand, and 100 that people cant even read.

0
Well it should be just left at that unless you know in detail what gameplay is then you shouldn't be posting about it, that is all.
Sub-Zero
Sub-Zero


About Me

0
Alright, after thinking long and hard I have decided to add the seconds. King 2 and Kuma Jr ( 2 ) will be joining us. As for Dr. B and Violet ... they will not. They are simply not very important and ridiculous so I'll leave it at that.
As for this battle, Subby eliminated Kuma winning 10-1. Mortal Kombat is now way in the lead.
Tekken: 17
Mortal Kombat: 20
Next Battle:
King 2 (Tekken) vS Sareena (Mortal Kombat)
Happy Voting!
As for this battle, Subby eliminated Kuma winning 10-1. Mortal Kombat is now way in the lead.
Tekken: 17
Mortal Kombat: 20
Next Battle:
King 2 (Tekken) vS Sareena (Mortal Kombat)
Happy Voting!


About Me

0
King 2.
0
Hum.... tough one... I'd say King takes it tho.
0
Crap I missed the last one. King 2.

0
King 2
© 1998-2025 Shadow Knight Media, LLC. All rights reserved. Mortal Kombat, the dragon logo and all character names are trademarks and copyright of Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.