Halo 2.

I rest my case.

^ exactly.

I was in a situation like that. Metal Slug 3 for PS2. IT was suppose to come out in November for PS2. Then it changed to May, THEN it changed to become for Xbox and now the PS2 version is coming out in September. Why are these people so frikin unorganized?

Also, Metal Slug 4 and 5 is going to come out for PS2 and Xbox in January. I have to wait that long to play 2 great games that aren't in arcades anymore!

Another annoyance is Halo 2. First Spring, then September, now November! I bet it will be delayed for January! That tatoo that guy showed on E3 is fake ya know.

Wanderer Wrote: Halo 2. I rest my case.

There was NEVER a concrete release date for Halo 2, not any set by Bungie or Microsoft anyway, so November 9th is the first release date, and it has never been delayed.



Fable.

No it doesn't annoy me. They'll come out when they come out.

UREIKO Wrote: No it doesn't annoy me. They'll come out when they come out.

No way dude. Games come out before they are even planned. Everyone knows that.





Duke Nukem Forever. I could've learned the programming language/software they're using and made the game by now. AND still have time left over.

I don't really care if games get pushed back, as ong as the game dosn't fall short, or lacks feature that where promised. Like MK:DA had a bunch of features that where promised from Boon then got cut due to time constraints. Even a second option menu got chopped due to time constraints. Also Tomb Raider: Angel of Darkness fell short of expectations too. If a studio is going hold a game because it it's not finished they need to make sure it is as close to perfect as possible. Take Ninja Gaiden, it got pushed back 3 times and that game came out as one of the best, most polished games ever. So it's not necissarily a matter of how long the game is pushed back, it's a matter of what is done with that extended time that justifies the studio doing it in the first place.

Error-Macro Wrote: There was NEVER a concrete release date for Halo 2, not any set by Bungie or Microsoft anyway, so November 9th is the first release date, and it has never been delayed. Fable.

Bullshit and you know it. It was suppose to be released LAST year during the spring or summer (don't remember which), then it was changed to December-something 2003. Then it was set for a February release, then it was changed to April-something, and NOW its November 9th.

Well, as long as it turns out to be a good game, I don't mind. Still, they shouldn't put a release date on a gmae if they know they can't make it. Posponing it once is okay, but three to four times isn't...

LouisTypo Wrote:Duke Nukem Forever. I could've learned the programming language/software they're using and made the game by now. AND still have time left over.

LOL, well they'll probably take forever ,geddit? (I know it was a weak joke, but I couldn't resist)