Kinda hard, Kinda easy......depends on who I played him with

Kintaro was the ma.....errrr shokan.

he was easy till u put the game on its maximum difficulty then it was a different story.

he was hard except with Sub-Zero. double flawless.

i rekon they should bring Kintaro back he was amint charector. Rock hard to beat as well.

he was cool
creepy looking
but like all sub-bosses(not moloch), he was very easy

at least moloch was fun to fight
kintaro needed more storyline to him
he was just there dor the sake of being there

Kintaro was a cool sub-boss. He was hard to beat at first, but then it got easier. I think that Kintaro should stay dead, because there is not much of a purpose to him. I think it was according to ]OMBAT's info that Rayden was the one who destroyed Kintaro.

Kintaro was a great sub-boss... he was hard as hell until you figured out what to do to defeat him. Whoever said Moloch is fun to fight your smokin to much crack. Moloch is kinda crappy.. he has no moves he just punches.. over.. and over.. and over .. unless u block then he throws you.

kintaro was easy in my opinion but i liked him i want to see him in MK6

Kinataro WAS HARD. But he was easy if you do the cheap way. You would do jump kick, walk back, jump kick, walk back and so on and so forth.

Kintaro was easy as long as your cheap. If your not, it can be pretty hard

hardest sub boss but he was easy. now shao kahn mk2. thats a different story. hard motherfucker.

u didnt even have to jump back to do those jump kicks, its all about timing them right. and like alot of people said he was hard until u figured out how to beat him. mk2 shao kahn wasnt shit, the mk3 kahn was harder and he was still easy. the hardest boss/sub-boss was kintaro, everyone else was pretty easy, including moloch. all it took for any bosses since mk3 was mostly combos.

Moloch sucked. Kintaro was hard till you got a good pattern of moves you could use on him for the easy kill

I just feel that Kintaro was probably the MOST underdeveloped character in the MK series. This is not counting the side games like MK:M and MK:SF.

The SNES Kintaro was a pain in my ass. Actually the whole SNES version of MKII was a pain in my ass. Kintaro was very cheap, I managed to beat him by avoiding his jumps and when he taunts I'd just unleash hell on him untill he starts blocking again. Then i'd dodge any thing he throws at me and counter with a projectile, but sometimes that bitch stomped on me.

I think Kintaro was the hardest Sub-Boss in Mortal Kombat so far...

like everyone sed he is pritty cheap but easy. enyway I like mataro beter he is not as cheap

motaro is not as cheap? lol. that mofo likes to use like 10 fireballs in a row, now thats cheap (although it is easy to dodge them if u time it right). the only reason the sub bosses from mk3 on is easy is because of the combos (at least i think so anyway.) case in point....mkt kintaro was easy as hell thanks to those combos. mk4 goro would probably be the second hardest sub boss only because they made it where it takes very little damage, which is cheap in itself, so he could seem harder.

Motaro was kind of a knock off of Kintaro and Goro. They gave their sub boss extra limbs. they just stuck em outta somewhere else! Kintaro was difficult when I used anyone but Mileena.

Mileena was easiest. I just keep using a mix of her roll and her flying kick and I got double flawless

Nightwolf1115 Wrote: Kintaro was easy as long as your cheap. If your not, it can be pretty hard

Do not reply to threads of this age... the "no bumping" regulation is clearly explained in this site's Community FAQ.

Thread closed.