the character who should not have been created is
the character who should not have been created is
0
posted02/15/2005 10:55 PM (UTC)byMember Since
12/30/2004 01:53 AM (UTC)
the character i think is stryker because the way his ending is and also because his only special is his machine gun and it sucks any ways
also because after trilogy and that is the last time you see him
also because after trilogy and that is the last time you see him
0
You, My friend, Are Correct.
0
takermk Wrote:
He has High and low grenades, Rush sweep, and Rush throw. His "best" special move is his gun, but not his only one. I really like Stryker. He's awesome. And who cares if you don't see him after Trilogy? What about Sheeva?
He has High and low grenades, Rush sweep, and Rush throw. His "best" special move is his gun, but not his only one. I really like Stryker. He's awesome. And who cares if you don't see him after Trilogy? What about Sheeva?
I love Stryker and Sheeva, they could be really good characters in a new MK. Instead they make boring new dumbass characters *cough*Shujinko


About Me
TheProphet, GGs my friend. Give'em Hell.
0
sub-zero99 Wrote:
the character i think is stryker because the way his ending is and also because his only special is his machine gun and it sucks any ways
also because after trilogy and that is the last time you see him
the character i think is stryker because the way his ending is and also because his only special is his machine gun and it sucks any ways
also because after trilogy and that is the last time you see him
I can see not liking his ending and story and design, but don't try to say his moves suck. They are some of the best in the game and thats not really an arguable point. That's why he is one of the top tier characters with great moves, great combos, and some weird hitboxes that make him challenging to deal with.


About Me
SubZero
==================================
Systems:Wii
Currently Playing: Sonic and the Secret Rings
==================================
0
I don't mind Stryker at all. In Mortal Kombat 3 he is fun to fight with and like others said, his moves are pretty cool and can create some devastating combos.
Characters I don't particularly care for.
-Kai
-Jarek
-Reiko
-Shinnok
And I think thats about it. I like all the characters past MK 4 and before it pretty much. I hate the Johnny Cage in MKT though.
Characters I don't particularly care for.
-Kai
-Jarek
-Reiko
-Shinnok
And I think thats about it. I like all the characters past MK 4 and before it pretty much. I hate the Johnny Cage in MKT though.


About Me
TheProphet, GGs my friend. Give'em Hell.
0
SubZero187 Wrote:
I hate the Johnny Cage in MKT though.
I hate the Johnny Cage in MKT though.
And rightfully so.
Shinnok, Kai, Sheeva, Nightwolf, Sindel, Sektor, Jarek, Reiko, Tanya, Liu Kang (only in MKD)
I disagree with Shujinko. Horrible execution, but he started as a great concept. I think Midway should rethink his idea, should he make it to MK7. But for HEAVENS SAKE, redesign his specials and styles. Give him the Tameshiwari/Pak Mei/Dan Tien Dao styles insdtead of Kung Laos.
He would be done nicely, should they think what I think...hehehe
I disagree with Shujinko. Horrible execution, but he started as a great concept. I think Midway should rethink his idea, should he make it to MK7. But for HEAVENS SAKE, redesign his specials and styles. Give him the Tameshiwari/Pak Mei/Dan Tien Dao styles insdtead of Kung Laos.
He would be done nicely, should they think what I think...hehehe

0
I think styker should have not been made, since he doesn't fit in the mk concept, and I felt Reiko shouldn't been made, cause they made a random plot with barley anything about, and there's nothing in his ending, and his moves suck.


About Me
Its Never Too Late
0
Stryker..........really hate him lol


0
none of them suck. they all have pros, cons, and room for improvement. besides, Stryker makes the most sense out of any character; if your world was being invaded by centaurs and tarkatans would you
(A) sit back and die [NO]
(B) use your limited martial arts ability and get your ass handed to you and probably die or turn into Motaro's little sex slave (he'd probably make you use the gold bikini from star wars) [NO]
(C) go in armed to the teeth, ready to blow the living crap out of whatever moves [DING DING DING]
without Stryker, Mortal Kombat would be nothing but Kung-Fu and ridiculous fireballs
(A) sit back and die [NO]
(B) use your limited martial arts ability and get your ass handed to you and probably die or turn into Motaro's little sex slave (he'd probably make you use the gold bikini from star wars) [NO]
(C) go in armed to the teeth, ready to blow the living crap out of whatever moves [DING DING DING]
without Stryker, Mortal Kombat would be nothing but Kung-Fu and ridiculous fireballs
Yes. There are characters that doesn't use martial arts specialities, but rather rely on technology or anything else. But I prefer Kano over Stryker anytime when it comes down to thing. He was a good filler, too bad he hasn't developed any depth within his storyline.
But Kai, Reiko... are unforgetably the worst characters ever created. No depth anyway.
But Kai, Reiko... are unforgetably the worst characters ever created. No depth anyway.


About Me
0
Shinnok, Kai, Sheeva, Sektor. they have served little to know purpose to the storyline.


About Me
0
All of the new characters in MK4


0
I actually liked Kai. his story sucked more ass than Richard Simmons in a week, but his character design and moves rocked. in arcades, I got pretty far with him ( the only reason I never beat it is because of freakin Rayden)


About Me
SubZero
==================================
Systems:Wii
Currently Playing: Sonic and the Secret Rings
==================================
0
A lot of people seem to not like Nightwolf, but Nightwolf is one of my favorite characters in MK3/UMK3.
In Mortal Kombat 4, I wouldn't say the characters were horrible, just uninteresting. I am sure that they will resurface someday in MK games.
Kai- decent looking fighter, cool fatalites, but his story just seemed too plain.
Jarek- Why didn't we just get Kano in MK 4?
In Mortal Kombat 4, I wouldn't say the characters were horrible, just uninteresting. I am sure that they will resurface someday in MK games.
Kai- decent looking fighter, cool fatalites, but his story just seemed too plain.
Jarek- Why didn't we just get Kano in MK 4?


0
SubZero187 Wrote:
A lot of people seem to not like Nightwolf, but Nightwolf is one of my favorite characters in MK3/UMK3.
In Mortal Kombat 4, I wouldn't say the characters were horrible, just uninteresting. I am sure that they will resurface someday in MK games.
Kai- decent looking fighter, cool fatalites, but his story just seemed too plain.
Jarek- Why didn't we just get Kano in MK 4?
they needed alot of new characters, so they almost litterally slapped together some new ones with crappy storylines. If Jarek comes back, it'll take every reality show on the planet to give him a special move makeoverA lot of people seem to not like Nightwolf, but Nightwolf is one of my favorite characters in MK3/UMK3.
In Mortal Kombat 4, I wouldn't say the characters were horrible, just uninteresting. I am sure that they will resurface someday in MK games.
Kai- decent looking fighter, cool fatalites, but his story just seemed too plain.
Jarek- Why didn't we just get Kano in MK 4?


0
But Kai, Reiko... are unforgetably the worst characters ever created. No depth anyway.
..... is unforgetably a word?


About Me
0
Well, unforgettably is with 2 t's...
PS... I'm back again I guess...
PS... I'm back again I guess...
© 1998-2025 Shadow Knight Media, LLC. All rights reserved. Mortal Kombat, the dragon logo and all character names are trademarks and copyright of Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.