Avatar
QueenAhnka
Avatar
About Me

Rebel. Outsider. Fan Of The Obscure. Politically Incorrect. Spitfire!

08/05/2008 05:44 PM (UTC)
0
Very idiotic thread. Seems like they want to take a step backwards
Avatar
biganndy27
08/05/2008 05:52 PM (UTC)
0
I don't think it should be able to be turned on and off with just the two options. It should be like the blood options. Where you can set it to high, a medium, maybe a low, and then completely off. So like, either the lower settings could make the damage slower, or simply have less of the articles able to fall off. I think it would work a lot better if it went slower.
Avatar
oracle
Avatar
About Me

-sig by MINION

08/05/2008 05:53 PM (UTC)
0
ProfesserAhnka Wrote:
Very idiotic thread. Seems like they want to take a step backwards
i think it more has to do with the type of damage a character will recieve.

this thread started after we saw sonyas character damage and 100% of it was on her shirt thus exposing a whole lot. i think it's safe to say that most of the other females will have damage similar to this where as scorpion has very realisitc damage covering his entire body.

i think it's more about not wanting a character to look totally retarded by the middle of a three round fight than simply getting rid of a feature.
Avatar
TemperaryUserName
Avatar
About Me
New sig on the way
08/05/2008 06:03 PM (UTC)
0
Forgive me for being insensitive, but what in God's name is wrong with you people!

There's no debate. More options are better than less options. If someone doesn't want character damage, and it's reasonably easy to program the option, than what the hell is the problem?

"No! I absolutely cannot enjoy character damage unless every other unobservable person in the world is also using character damage!"

Someone give me a bottle of tabasco so I can pour it into my eyes.
Avatar
QueenAhnka
Avatar
About Me

Rebel. Outsider. Fan Of The Obscure. Politically Incorrect. Spitfire!

08/05/2008 06:46 PM (UTC)
0
But it shouldn't be on the top of midways list. Its very small and stupid to complain about something like this. I think its pathetic. Poor MK team, their fans are never satisfied.
Avatar
mkflegend
08/05/2008 07:54 PM (UTC)
0
No reason to argue over this anywho because chances are they'll be putting in a "violent option off or on" anyway, just like with previous MK games even going back to the original ones with "blood one or off"

If you turn this off, obviously there won't be no damage, blood or fatalities.

It's really quite simple actually and a standard option.
Avatar
mercenarydartz
08/06/2008 07:51 PM (UTC)
0
To the thread starter: Stop Bitching
Avatar
DeathScepter
Avatar
About Me

Save a life; Kill a necromorph

08/06/2008 08:52 PM (UTC)
0
TemperaryUserName Wrote:
Forgive me for being insensitive, but what in God's name is wrong with you people!

There's no debate. More options are better than less options. If someone doesn't want character damage, and it's reasonably easy to program the option, than what the hell is the problem?

"No! I absolutely cannot enjoy character damage unless every other unobservable person in the world is also using character damage!"

Someone give me a bottle of tabasco so I can pour it into my eyes.





How much tabasco sance do you want? I have plenty of it.


*starts handing TUN bottles of tabasco*


well more and more options are great because it is more.


More the merry.

I would love to make all of characters bleed rivers of blood and beat the crap out of all of the DC characters and give them a lot of damage.

But at the same time, there are players don't want all of the damage and blood and gory and shit and all that.

So an option ranging from off to flat out gory and exteme damage(like almost nothing left)
Pages: 3
Discord
Twitch
Twitter
YouTube
Facebook
Privacy Policy
© 1998-2025 Shadow Knight Media, LLC. All rights reserved. Mortal Kombat, the dragon logo and all character names are trademarks and copyright of Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.