POLL: How old are those who are happy with Lui Kangs Return
0
posted08/22/2004 12:03 PM (UTC)by
Avatar
Christopher777
Avatar
Member Since
06/04/2004 04:04 AM (UTC)
Christopher777: 21

Very displeased.
Avatar
saibotWins
08/20/2004 03:16 AM (UTC)
0
15
very happy
Avatar
ETHER
08/20/2004 03:17 AM (UTC)
0
ether

age:23

Dissapointed, but willing to read Liu Kang's story before making final judgement.
Avatar
Cages_Shades
Avatar
About Me
Props to MINION
08/20/2004 03:19 AM (UTC)
0
15
Mondo Uber Happy!!
Avatar
slayerovgods
Avatar
About Me

only the fallen have won,because the fallen can't run my vision is not obscure for war there is no cure.

08/20/2004 03:21 AM (UTC)
0
15
happy :)
Avatar
YingYeung
08/20/2004 03:21 AM (UTC)
0
17 and really happy (although i never thought I'd say it : I'm happy he's back !)
Avatar
Toxik
Avatar
About Me
08/20/2004 03:24 AM (UTC)
0
Not happy about it!!! furious
Avatar
stevodastoppa
Avatar
About Me

rehab is for quitters...

08/20/2004 03:25 AM (UTC)
0
15 and really happy! it feels right with him back...for some reason mk without lui just isnt mk...
Avatar
Hecate
08/20/2004 03:25 AM (UTC)
0
15: Unhappy. I was hoping he would be gone for good. But oh well. I can always beat the shit out of him. :-p
Avatar
XiahouDun84
08/20/2004 03:26 AM (UTC)
0
19 and still not impressed. Kang should've stayed in the ground.
Avatar
saibotWins
08/20/2004 03:27 AM (UTC)
0
mortal kombat without lui is street fighter without ryu
Avatar
Bezou
Avatar
About Me
08/20/2004 03:47 AM (UTC)
0
Twenty six and extremely happy. grin
Also, what the hell does it matter how old we are?
Avatar
Christopher777
08/20/2004 03:47 AM (UTC)
0

Toxik Wrote:
Not happy about it!!!


Yes but how old are you ?
Avatar
Kahn91
08/20/2004 04:00 AM (UTC)
0
Why does it matter(13) and I didn't think I would, but when I saw Liu Kang I let out a small scream. He doesn't look zombish or spiritish to me...
Avatar
Christopher777
08/20/2004 04:02 AM (UTC)
0
I am trying to get an idea of the maturity or the Lui Pro camp. Age, although not always a perfect indicator, does give some idea of maturity. For example, a 13 year old is more likely to be happy with the return of an old character reagrdless of how badly it affects and cheapens the plot. Someone more seasoned on fiction may find these stunts more distasteful and feel a cheapening effect.

So far the trend has been

20+ Displeased
Teen years=Pleased
Avatar
Toxik
Avatar
About Me
08/20/2004 04:02 AM (UTC)
0

Christopher777 Wrote:

Toxik Wrote:
Not happy about it!!!

Yes but how old are you ?


I am 18 grin wink
Avatar
PaulLondon
08/20/2004 04:04 AM (UTC)
0
86. Pissed
Avatar
Bezou
Avatar
About Me
08/20/2004 04:04 AM (UTC)
0
Christopher777 - In other words, you're deliberately trying to use irrelevant information to prove your point. How big of you. So far the 20pluses are you, ether and me, and at least ether is willing to give it a chance. You sicken me.
Avatar
SanzoQuanChi
Avatar
About Me

I don't know how to put a picture here, so here's some words instead.

08/20/2004 04:07 AM (UTC)
0
mortal kombat without lui is street fighter without ryu

Street Fighter w/out Ryu would be...AWESOME, hes so boring n his story sucks

To prove your theory wrong:
I despise Lui Kang and I'm not happy he's coming back, 14 here
Avatar
Christopher777
08/20/2004 04:09 AM (UTC)
0

sanzoquanchi Wrote:
mortal kombat without lui is street fighter without ryu

Street Fighter w/out Ryu would be...AWESOME, hes so boring n his story sucks

To prove your theory wrong:
I despise Lui Kang and I'm not happy he's coming back, 14 here


It actually doesnt disprove my theory. I was looking for trends, and in trends there are always deviations from the norm. You are one of those deviations who in my opinion has a more matured taste in fiction.
Avatar
AberzX
08/20/2004 04:10 AM (UTC)
0
This topic is stupid. Does it really matter how old everyone is? It would have been better off if the topic was just "Who is happy with Liu Kang's return?" You can't even spell his name right, so theres no way you should even be allowed to make a topic as stupid as this. What does everyone's age have to do with anything at all?
Avatar
Christopher777
08/20/2004 04:11 AM (UTC)
0

Bezou Wrote:
Christopher777 - In other words, you're deliberately trying to use irrelevant information to prove your point. How big of you. So far the 20pluses are you, ether and me, and at least ether is willing to give it a chance. You sicken me.


Sicken you? Your a tool. Dictators sicken me, corporations that destroy the planet sicken me. People That disagree with me about videos games, I simply think they're tools, in good fun I may add.

So please piss the hell off with your "sicken me" bull.
Avatar
saibotWins
08/20/2004 04:11 AM (UTC)
0
i think this is a good thread
Avatar
Bezou
Avatar
About Me
08/20/2004 04:14 AM (UTC)
0
Christopher777 Wrote:
Sicken you? Your a tool. Dictators sicken me, corporations that destroy the planet sicken me. People That disagree with me about videos games, I simply think they're tools, in good fun I may add.

So please piss the hell off with your "sicken me" bull.


You don't like a storyline twist and so you have to make a thread about it. And just to skew the results you have to throw in something completely irrelevant like a person's age. You call yourself mature and yet you're whining about how you can't deal with this happening. And naturally, anyone who disagrees must be wrong. Sounds quite childish to me.

I'm a tool? Don't make me laugh.
Avatar
ETHER
08/20/2004 04:26 AM (UTC)
0
I'm dissapointed because Kang's death in Deadly Alliance was a huge plot twist for Mortal Kombat. Now it seems as if they've simply disregarded those events. However, it's MK, and you can't take it too seriously. So I'm willing to read his story and live with it. Hell, how can I complain when I've got Ermac, Kabal, Baraka and Ashrah.....plus suicides and death traps!
Pages: 5
Discord
Twitch
Twitter
YouTube
Facebook
Privacy Policy
© 1998-2025 Shadow Knight Media, LLC. All rights reserved. Mortal Kombat, the dragon logo and all character names are trademarks and copyright of Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.