Avatar
~Crow~
01/28/2006 04:10 AM (UTC)
0
EmmKayEss Wrote:
Before anything, I'd just like to clear up that in no moment have I ever thought that Chan or Trish or any female mod/SP has ever "slept" their way to the top, and even if there was any truth to that (which I doubt there is), I don't care 'cause it ain't my business. Having said that...

~Crow~ Wrote:
I'm honestly quite tired of you "men" always doing this anytime a female happens to receive anything on this site. It was done with Chan_Ming, and here it is again. I think some of you have serious issues with being "real men", as it's apparent you are all trying to be so macho. As I said earlier this month... I am through taking this nonsense lightly. If you enjoy making sexist remarks and implying that any female has to sleep their way to the top then you can simply enjoy your skull points. Sexist remarks are in the same category as racism and I'm simply not going to tolerate it. Do you think you'd be "macho" to say, "Hey guys, all the black people here get ranked up pretty fast!". I don't think so... and as I said, I'm done taking things like this lightly.


Raining_Smoke Wrote:
Like we didnt see this one coming....

Females move up fast in MKO....no surprise there.


Oh right... you'd be right, except your logic is flawed since Pink_Ranger has been a member on this site longer than me and most of the other Portal Guards. Oh yeah Raining_Smoke, you don't get much faster than that.


The majority of the anti-Chan comments were due to the fact that she hadn't been here much when she got the mod status. Yeah, there were those who said she was "dating" one of the higher ups here (in fact I think it was actually you they referred to, but I don't really remember), but those who thought/said that paled in comparison (number-wise) to those who simply had a problem with someone so new being given so much power. So in that sense, it would seem YOUR logic is flawed in comparing both situations.


Good job of using my own quotes against me... except that has nothing to do with the subject at all. The point I was trying to make was this is based on gender alone and nothing else really. I understand people who were concerned with someone "relatively new" being given power, but the fact that she happened to be a girl was what set them off. I seem to recall people using that fact and focusing on it alone, despite the fact i was simply going by a majority based poll thread I made when backing who I did for moderator at the time. I was not the forum director so that was simply my way of supporting what the majority seemed to want.

Regardless, I can pull up some quotes directed towards Chan_Ming if you'd like me too... ones that deal with her length of time as a member are fine, because again... I understand that point of view perfectly. However, my post clearly has to do with what gender they happened to be... and if you are implying that people in a large number did not have a problem with Chan simply because she was a female, you have quite a bad memory.
Avatar
~Crow~
01/28/2006 04:14 AM (UTC)
0
Raining_Smoke Wrote:
Yeah Chan here....real clever with the ole' Antarctica as the Nationality trick...this site is a joke, there isnt even the flag of England to choose from! (Refer to Feedback thread).


At least I'll know not to unban you next time you come crying to me for sympathy, then. Like others I've given chances before, you have not change nor will you ever change.


If you guys have nothing to say on the subject being discussed or do not wish to congratulate Pink_Ranger on the rank, please just leave this thread in peace.
Avatar
Raining_Smoke
01/28/2006 04:16 AM (UTC)
0
Ok you got me there Crow....just dont ban me.
Avatar
Afghanblade
01/28/2006 04:22 AM (UTC)
0
~Crow~ Wrote:
Raining_Smoke Wrote:
Yeah Chan here....real clever with the ole' Antarctica as the Nationality trick...this site is a joke, there isnt even the flag of England to choose from! (Refer to Feedback thread).


At least I'll know not to unban you next time you come crying to me for sympathy, then. Like others I've given chances before, you have not change nor will you ever change.
.


Why would there be any reason for you to ban him just because he wants his country's flag? Crow, I think you're taking you're job a bit too seriously. Why don't you have a Sierra Mist, it works everytime I'm ticked off for silly reasons.

You can thank me later.
Avatar
DMitch
01/28/2006 04:24 AM (UTC)
0
Do you guys really care about going up in MKO? There is only one guy who it really matter to... that guy is MKS. I hate that piece of shit scumbag.

































grinjk
Avatar
Raining_Smoke
01/28/2006 04:24 AM (UTC)
0
Wow DMitch!!...

Haha that was funny man.
Avatar
Raining_Smoke
01/28/2006 04:26 AM (UTC)
0
Afghanblade Wrote:
~Crow~ Wrote:
Raining_Smoke Wrote:
Yeah Chan here....real clever with the ole' Antarctica as the Nationality trick...this site is a joke, there isnt even the flag of England to choose from! (Refer to Feedback thread).


At least I'll know not to unban you next time you come crying to me for sympathy, then. Like others I've given chances before, you have not change nor will you ever change.
.


Why would there be any reason for you to ban him just because he wants his country's flag? Crow, I think you're taking you're job a bit too seriously. Why don't you have a Sierra Mist, it works everytime I'm ticked off for silly reasons.

You can thank me later.


Btw Afghan needs his flag updated! Totally understand his position....
Avatar
~Crow~
01/28/2006 04:26 AM (UTC)
0
Afghanblade Wrote:
~Crow~ Wrote:
Raining_Smoke Wrote:
Yeah Chan here....real clever with the ole' Antarctica as the Nationality trick...this site is a joke, there isnt even the flag of England to choose from! (Refer to Feedback thread).


At least I'll know not to unban you next time you come crying to me for sympathy, then. Like others I've given chances before, you have not change nor will you ever change.
.


Why would there be any reason for you to ban him just because he wants his country's flag? Crow, I think you're taking you're job a bit too seriously. Why don't you have a Sierra Mist, it works everytime I'm ticked off for silly reasons.

You can thank me later.



You're misunderstanding me... I'm not going to ban him, I'm simply stating that if he gets banned again for doing something stupid I'm not going to bother reversing the decision. If you remember correctly, a while ago he made a thread that contained the content "FUCK YOU MKO" and it basically said he was leaving the site. The moderator who closed that thread banned him because it was clear he didn't like the site nor did he want to be on it.

However, not long after that he e-mailed me and said he was sorry. He claimed he really did like this site and enjoyed posting on it. So... I thought it would be nice to just give him another chance. That's the point I was making there. He promised he would change his behaviour and with replies like this I don't really think he has. So if he does get banned again I sincerely doubt I will be removing it.
Avatar
EmmKayEss
01/28/2006 04:30 AM (UTC)
0
~Crow~ Wrote:
The point I was trying to make was this is based on gender alone and nothing else really.


Can anybody honestly say that they DO NOT interpret that sentence as you saying "The ONLY problem people have with them (Pink_Ranger, Chan_MIng) being selected is the fact that they are women. Nothing else matters, just the fact that they are women."? 'Cause that's how I interpret it, and that's why I say you're mistaken, because YES I know that people didn't like the fact that a GIRL had been chosen to become a mod. Not only that, but it was a GIRL who had only been here for (and I'm just guessing here) 6 months (and obviously there are those who foolishly said "girl" + "member for 6 months"= dating a mod). So it wasn't (in Chan's case) based on gender alone, and the posts (not only in the thread announcing the new mods, btw) prove that.

~Crow~ Wrote:
However, my post clearly has to do with what gender they happened to be... and if you are implying that people in a large number did not have a problem with Chan simply because she was a female, you have quite a bad memory.


I never said that people didn't have a problem with her being a woman. You say I did a good job using your quotes against you, well kudos to you too, 'cause you apparently didn't read the parts where I said "The majority of the anti-Chan comments were due to the fact that she hadn't been here much when she got the mod status" (thus meaning that the other part of that number -the minority, at least from what I remember- had a problem with her being a mod because she's a she) or when I wrote "those who thought/said that paled in comparison (number-wise) to those who simply had a problem with someone so new being given so much power".

Are there those who have a problem with ANY girl being a mod? Probably. Were the MAIN reasons why people complained when Chan got promoted the same reasons why people complained about PR right now (thus my calling your logic flawed)? No, at least not IMO.

Avatar
Raining_Smoke
01/28/2006 04:38 AM (UTC)
0
I know I came off as sexist, but I'm not. It just seems this site gets someone ranked up every day. I remember seeing a "Congratulations" thread almost every day related to rank. It's almost ridiculous. But the trend had seemed to stop..but PR earned it, so congrats Im sorry.
Avatar
~Crow~
01/28/2006 04:46 AM (UTC)
0
EmmKayEss Wrote:

Can anybody honestly say that they DO NOT interpret that sentence as you saying "The ONLY problem people have with them (Pink_Ranger, Chan_MIng) being selected is the fact that they are women. Nothing else matters, just the fact that they are women."? 'Cause that's how I interpret it, and that's why I say you're mistaken, because YES I know that people didn't like the fact that a GIRL had been chosen to become a mod. Not only that, but it was a GIRL who had only been here for (and I'm just guessing here) 6 months (and obviously there are those who foolishly said "girl" + "member for 6 months"= dating a mod). So it wasn't (in Chan's case) based on gender alone, and the posts (not only in the thread announcing the new mods, btw) prove that.


Once again... the members themselves chose Chan. It was their stupidity that led to the whole "she must be dating one of them!" thing. I was attempting to please the majority with the decision, but of course things like that always seem to backfire. However... what reason do you have for the dislike of Pink_Ranger? She has been a member on the site longer than I have, is active and actually wants to better MKO. So what other than the fact that she's a woman do they have? Judging from replies such as "Nice wank up" and "99.9% of females on this site rank up", and "All females move up the ranks quickly" I'd say it was simply because she happens to be female. I don't see them complaining about any other reasons but that. What's your stance on that? Why not jump all over their case about it?


EmmKayEss Wrote:
I never said that people didn't have a problem with her being a woman. You say I did a good job using your quotes against you, well kudos to you too, 'cause you apparently didn't read the parts where I said "The majority of the anti-Chan comments were due to the fact that she hadn't been here much when she got the mod status" (thus meaning that the other part of that number -the minority, at least from what I remember- had a problem with her being a mod because she's a she) or when I wrote "those who thought/said that paled in comparison (number-wise) to those who simply had a problem with someone so new being given so much power".



Honestly, I just think you are underestimating the amount of people who disliked Chan simply for that one reason. I've seen certain IM conversations, and I can assure you the people talking negatively about her didn't care one bit about her length of time as a member. I am willing to say perhaps half of the people who objected felt it was too soon, but there were a lot of people who brought up the fact that she as female. When you are attempting to make a point, it's wise to base it on the person alone and not their gender, race, etc. How about if someone said this: "Well, that guy only ranked up because he's black. We all know black guys all get ranked up here". There is no single reply in this thread that states any reason why PR should not be a Shadow Priest, other than the fact that she's female. As for Chan, there were people with legitimate concerns but what I remember most is people calling people like me out because she was a female and she must have been dating someone on the site to get there. Once again, I've seen several IM convos about this topic, some involving the same exact individuals from this thread. That is why I made such a comparison; it's the same guys over and over.
Avatar
Kahn91
01/28/2006 05:09 AM (UTC)
0
Congrats Trish!!

Please try not to violate Crow's bum with skulls or dragons. :( Or me. Oriana, however, deserves it.... wink
Avatar
EmmKayEss
01/28/2006 05:11 AM (UTC)
0
~Crow~ Wrote:

However... what reason do you have for the dislike of Pink_Ranger? She has been a member on the site longer than I have, is active and actually wants to better MKO. So what other than the fact that she's a woman do they have? Judging from replies such as "Nice wank up" and "99.9% of females on this site rank up", and "All females move up the ranks quickly" I'd say it was simply because she happens to be female. I don't see them complaining about any other reasons but that.



First of all, let me remind you that if I got on your case, it was because I feel that you are mistaken in saying that the MAIN reasons why people complained with both of 'em were the same.

~Crow~ Wrote:
I am willing to say perhaps half of the people who objected felt it was too soon, but there were a lot of people who brought up the fact that she as female.


Interesting how in your previous post directed towards me you said that it was an issue based on gender alone, and here you are admitting that there was another reason. Also, without being too specific, you mention two figures: "half" and "a lot". Well, half is 50%, and it's pretty safe to assume that whatever number is represented in "a lot" is less than 50%, 'cause if not you would've said "the other half" and not "a lot". And that is exactly what I've been saying all along (when it comes to Chan, at least). Maybe I was wrong in saying that one number paled in comparison to the other, but I did say "the majority", in other words, that "half" you also mentioned.

~Crow~ Wrote:
Why not jump all over their case about it?


Well, I dunno if you expected for me or anybody else to outright post something along the lines of what Poasty wrote, but I stated my "stance" in my first post directed towards you:

EmmKayEss Wrote:
Before anything, I'd just like to clear up that in no moment have I ever thought that Chan or Trish or any female mod/SP has ever "slept" their way to the top, and even if there was any truth to that (which I doubt there is), I don't care 'cause it ain't my business.



Out of respect towards Trish, barring any extreme circumstance I'm leaving this thread by once again saying congrats. Crow, if you have anything else you'd like to say, I'd love to read it, here or via PM.
Avatar
Rabid_Wolverine
01/28/2006 05:26 AM (UTC)
0
How come all this Members vs Staff shit has to start up almost everytime anyone gets a rank up? Especially if its a more important rank on MKO. Gotta love it, eh?
Avatar
~Crow~
01/28/2006 05:39 AM (UTC)
0
Rabid_Wolverine Wrote:
How come all this Members vs Staff shit has to start up almost everytime anyone gets a rank up? Especially if its a more important rank on MKO. Gotta love it, eh?


At least it gives the new SPs a taste of what's to come should they ever reach the next level... I'm all out of options on how to fix the problem. I can't please certain people here with anything, so it shouldn't be surprising this happens so often. Apparently it's just the "cool" thing to do these days.
Avatar
danadbab
Avatar
About Me

Hello

01/28/2006 05:44 AM (UTC)
0
My god another thread that turns into EKE vs CROW.. sleepsleepsleepsleep






good luck pinky. smile

kinda funny, but i had thought you already were a SP.
then you stop being one like 2 months ago. geez, did i just make this up in my head confused odd.
Avatar
Rabid_Wolverine
01/28/2006 05:50 AM (UTC)
0
~Crow~ Wrote:
Rabid_Wolverine Wrote:
How come all this Members vs Staff shit has to start up almost everytime anyone gets a rank up? Especially if its a more important rank on MKO. Gotta love it, eh?


At least it gives the new SPs a taste of what's to come should they ever reach the next level... I'm all out of options on how to fix the problem. I can't please certain people here with anything, so it shouldn't be surprising this happens so often. Apparently it's just the "cool" thing to do these days.


No offense, but you shouldn't be talking like its all the members fault. Really, its not that hard to get a rise out of you anymore. Does anyone really expect a group of pissed off members (or only one) arguing with a pissed off mod to do much? Close the threads, isn't that one of the reasons you have that option?
Avatar
~Crow~
01/28/2006 06:01 AM (UTC)
0
Rabid_Wolverine Wrote:
~Crow~ Wrote:
Rabid_Wolverine Wrote:
How come all this Members vs Staff shit has to start up almost everytime anyone gets a rank up? Especially if its a more important rank on MKO. Gotta love it, eh?


At least it gives the new SPs a taste of what's to come should they ever reach the next level... I'm all out of options on how to fix the problem. I can't please certain people here with anything, so it shouldn't be surprising this happens so often. Apparently it's just the "cool" thing to do these days.


No offense, but you shouldn't be talking like its all the members fault. Really, its not that hard to get a rise out of you anymore. Does anyone really expect a group of pissed off members (or only one) arguing with a pissed off mod to do much? Close the threads, isn't that one of the reasons you have that option?


Okay, sorry for trying to point at sexist behaviour. I guess I'll keep my opinions to myself next time and watch as no one else will stand as their "friend" gets flamed. Honestly, what do you expect me to do? Keep my mouth shut and sit in the corner? Stopping flaming is what I'm supposed to be doing on these forums... I'm not going to just close threads and ignore the issues. I'd rather confront them, personally. Closing this would have solved nothing at all, really.
Avatar
Rabid_Wolverine
01/28/2006 06:24 AM (UTC)
0
Edit : Forget it, I'll step down.
Avatar
Torchia
01/28/2006 06:25 AM (UTC)
0
Congrats. Everyone else... Isn't the PM system back up? Perhaps take it to that?
Avatar
danadbab
Avatar
About Me

Hello

01/28/2006 08:51 AM (UTC)
0
yeah i agree, closing threads just because is silly.


the back and forth repeating yourself/s is also silly..
Avatar
Alpha_Q_Up
01/28/2006 09:20 AM (UTC)
0
It's threads like these that keep me coming back to MKO, and BTW congrats Pinky, I'll be looking forward to some more skulls tongue
Avatar
SOLIDUS
01/28/2006 09:57 AM (UTC)
0
Afghanblade Wrote:
What's so bad about saying "wank up"?confused


Haha yikes, I only realised I got skulled for that just now what the hell? I was joking around. I repeat,

JOKING AROUND.

I know Pink Ranger certainly isn't stupid enough to of gave me that, I'd love to know who did though.
Avatar
GoddessOfLight
01/28/2006 01:51 PM (UTC)
0
mkflegend Wrote:
Congrats Pinky!! I'm sure you and GOL will now have the whole mod rivalry going on lol.Just kidding.Good luck, I don't know you that well but you're cool in my book.grin


I'm not a Shadow Priest anymore mkf. wink

PS - Yea, I think Solidus' Skull is stupid. He was clearly joking.
Avatar
danadbab
Avatar
About Me

Hello

01/28/2006 06:40 PM (UTC)
0
GoddessOfLight Wrote:
mkflegend Wrote:
Congrats Pinky!! I'm sure you and GOL will now have the whole mod rivalry going on lol.Just kidding.Good luck, I don't know you that well but you're cool in my book.grin


I'm not a Shadow Priest anymore mkf. wink

PS - Yea, I think Solidus' Skull is stupid. He was clearly joking.
oh my, im so dumb.. i must have confused you w/ trish. my bad.
Discord
Twitch
Twitter
YouTube
Facebook
Privacy Policy
© 1998-2025 Shadow Knight Media, LLC. All rights reserved. Mortal Kombat, the dragon logo and all character names are trademarks and copyright of Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.