Tom Brady announces his main will be Aquaman. Aquaman top tier?
0
posted04/09/2013 06:05 PM (UTC)by
Avatar
TemperaryUserName
Avatar
About Me
New sig on the way
Member Since
02/10/2003 01:32 AM (UTC)
It's no secret (anymore) that Tom Brady worked on the prima guide, and rumors have been floating around TYM already that Aquaman is gonna be top tier.

Any thoughts on this? I kinda saw this coming. He's a range character with strong anti-air in a game with no dash-block mechanic. This is bad news for me. I wanted Aquaman all to myself.
Avatar
Nephrite
04/07/2013 10:45 PM (UTC)
0
lulstombradyluls tongue
Avatar
GodlyShinnok
04/07/2013 10:48 PM (UTC)
0
Remember what happened to Sub-Zero? Yeah...
Avatar
MINION
Avatar
About Me
Groundbreaking Debut | You[Tube] | deviantART | Twitter
04/07/2013 10:53 PM (UTC)
0
Doesn't surprise me in the least. Aquaman has for the majority been comic relief. His inclusion, and playstyle had to serve some meaning in this game. I'd expect nothing less then top for all this characters troubles. Even so, I was looking forward to AM as well. But when MM is in the game. My roster will then be complete as he will be my Flagship character.
Avatar
Jaded-Raven
04/07/2013 10:57 PM (UTC)
0
I've never cared for tiers. I pick a character I like and practise with that character until I feel I more or less got this character down right. And if I for some reason don't feel like the character's gameplay fits me, then I pick another character.

For example, from what I understand, Jade is very low-tier in MK, but that hasn't prevented me to play as her, practised with her and learning to use her. However, I'm no pro gamer, I don't do competetive play, I play for fun. I just like to know how my character works and be able to pull off some sweet moves.

I feel it is a bit sad that people choose a character depending on the "tier", because that means we will see ALOT of one or two characters online and none of the other characters. When playing online in MK, I saw alot of Scorpions and Kung Laos, when I played SSF4 online, I saw alot of Ryus, Kens and Sagats, and they were ALL doing the same thing! That's not fun. It's boring as hell! So I more or less stopped playing fighting games online.
Avatar
Nephrite
04/07/2013 10:57 PM (UTC)
0
GodlyShinnok Wrote:
Remember what happened to Sub-Zero? Yeah...


He rolled down the hill from being one of the best characters in the game to being almost one of the worst and thus put Tom Brady through a real rollercoaster, but they eventually reunited lol.

MAINS CAST: Sub-Zero -> Kung Lao -> Sub-Zero -> Raiden -> Sub-Zero.

CAMEOS: Noob Saibot, Johnny Cage and Kano. (Am I missing anyone?)
Avatar
MINION
Avatar
About Me
Groundbreaking Debut | You[Tube] | deviantART | Twitter
04/07/2013 11:14 PM (UTC)
0
Green Arrow will eventually crawl up the tier list. Rest assured. If not now, soon.
Avatar
Kabal20
Avatar
About Me

XBL: kabal31082, PSN: Kabal31082
Nintendo Id: kabal82, 3ds friend code: 2595-3252-2624

04/07/2013 11:17 PM (UTC)
0
Jaded-Raven Wrote:
When playing online in MK, I saw alot of Scorpions and Kung Laos


Yeah, I recall the Prima guide saying both Raiden and Shang where top tier. I played as them a lot online, but I didn't see a lot of other users using them. A lot of Kung Laos, Ermacs and Noob Saibots. The few players I did see using Raiden and Shang where terrible with them.

Also just because its rumored Aquaman will be top tier, doesn't mean he'll last as top tier. Usually the tier list changes once a game has been released and the community has had time to figure the game out. It also doesn't account for the fact that NRS could re-balance the game with a patch and change the whole tier list if characters are unbalanced.

TemperaryUserName Wrote:
He's a range character with strong anti-air in a game with no dash-block mechanic.


If this is the case I could see him getting re-balanced and nerfed.
Avatar
JimothyKricket
Avatar
About Me

Just launched my blog, check it out! http://jimothykricket.tumblr.com

04/07/2013 11:28 PM (UTC)
0
Jaded-Raven Wrote:
I've never cared for tiers. I pick a character I like and practise with that character until I feel I more or less got this character down right. And if I for some reason don't feel like the character's gameplay fits me, then I pick another character.

For example, from what I understand, Jade is very low-tier in MK, but that hasn't prevented me to play as her, practised with her and learning to use her. However, I'm no pro gamer, I don't do competetive play, I play for fun. I just like to know how my character works and be able to pull off some sweet moves.

I feel it is a bit sad that people choose a character depending on the "tier", because that means we will see ALOT of one or two characters online and none of the other characters. When playing online in MK, I saw alot of Scorpions and Kung Laos, when I played SSF4 online, I saw alot of Ryus, Kens and Sagats, and they were ALL doing the same thing! That's not fun. It's boring as hell! So I more or less stopped playing fighting games online.


This post deserves an echo.
Avatar
NoobSaibot5
04/07/2013 11:37 PM (UTC)
0
I don't go by tiers, and I think it's laughable when people flock to characters just because one guy says they are good.

Pick a character because you like them and they suit your tastes, not because Tom Brady, or REO, or whoever else likes them.
Avatar
Jaded-Raven
04/07/2013 11:56 PM (UTC)
0
NoobSaibot5 Wrote:
I don't go by tiers, and I think it's laughable when people flock to characters just because one guy says they are good.

Pick a character because you like them and they suit your tastes, not because Tom Brady, or REO, or whoever else likes them.


Exactly. ^^
NoobSaibot5 Wrote:
I don't go by tiers, and I think it's laughable when people flock to characters just because one guy says they are good.

Pick a character because you like them and they suit your tastes, not because Tom Brady, or REO, or whoever else likes them.



despite what brady says there is no doubt that nrs went out of there way to turn aquaman from a joke to a bad ass though

i have to admit he looks amazing in regards to gameplay
Avatar
MrRolex
04/08/2013 12:44 AM (UTC)
0
TemperaryUserName Wrote:
It's no secret (anymore) that Tom Brady worked on the prima guide, and rumors have been floating around TYM already that Aquaman is gonna be top tier.

Any thoughts on this? I kinda saw this coming. He's a range character with strong anti-air in a game with no dash-block mechanic. This is bad news for me. I wanted Aquaman all to myself.


This is the guy who said Sub Zero was the highest tier character in MK9 when it first came out.

He was wrong then. He'll probably be wrong about this too.
Avatar
MrRolex
04/08/2013 12:47 AM (UTC)
0
Nephrite Wrote:
GodlyShinnok Wrote:
Remember what happened to Sub-Zero? Yeah...


He rolled down the hill from being one of the best characters in the game to being almost one of the worst and thus put Tom Brady through a real rollercoaster, but they eventually reunited lol.

MAINS CAST: Sub-Zero -> Kung Lao -> Sub-Zero -> Raiden -> Sub-Zero.

CAMEOS: Noob Saibot, Johnny Cage and Kano. (Am I missing anyone?)


Sub Zero was never under any circumstances one of the top characters in MK9.

When the game was first released, Kung Lao and Cyrax were broken and way above everyone else. Kabal, Jax and certain others were also above SZ.

Brady is just full of shit and should go back to making his videos.

Anyone remember how the Prima Guide for MK9 was received?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TQ40YT4c5Ik
Avatar
Darkhound74
04/08/2013 12:49 AM (UTC)
0
MrRolex Wrote:
TemperaryUserName Wrote:
It's no secret (anymore) that Tom Brady worked on the prima guide, and rumors have been floating around TYM already that Aquaman is gonna be top tier.

Any thoughts on this? I kinda saw this coming. He's a range character with strong anti-air in a game with no dash-block mechanic. This is bad news for me. I wanted Aquaman all to myself.


This is the guy who said Sub Zero was the highest tier character in MK9 when it first came out.

He was wrong then. He'll probably be wrong about this too.


I believe this was already addressed, but regardless Aquaman looks like a threat and I can't wait to get my chance to play.
Avatar
MrRolex
04/08/2013 12:56 AM (UTC)
0
Darkhound74 Wrote:
MrRolex Wrote:
TemperaryUserName Wrote:
It's no secret (anymore) that Tom Brady worked on the prima guide, and rumors have been floating around TYM already that Aquaman is gonna be top tier.

Any thoughts on this? I kinda saw this coming. He's a range character with strong anti-air in a game with no dash-block mechanic. This is bad news for me. I wanted Aquaman all to myself.


This is the guy who said Sub Zero was the highest tier character in MK9 when it first came out.

He was wrong then. He'll probably be wrong about this too.


I believe this was already addressed, but regardless Aquaman looks like a threat and I can't wait to get my chance to play.


Yeah, someone else got there first.

To be fair, I don't think Brady actually said he's top tier - just that he's maining him but I might be wrong. I don't follow the guy religiously like some people.
Avatar
TemperaryUserName
Avatar
About Me
New sig on the way
04/08/2013 01:44 AM (UTC)
0
Oh boy...

Jaded-Raven Wrote:
I feel it is a bit sad that people choose a character depending on the "tier", because that means we will see ALOT of one or two characters online and none of the other characters. When playing online in MK, I saw alot of Scorpions and Kung Laos, when I played SSF4 online, I saw alot of Ryus, Kens and Sagats, and they were ALL doing the same thing! That's not fun. It's boring as hell! So I more or less stopped playing fighting games online.

I don't think your perspective is unhealthy, but I think your thesis about the low-tier players "having more fun" is WAY off. Three reasons:

A) winning, in of itself, is fun. To speak about tier-whores like they sold their souls to win is kinda baseless. They're having fun just like you. If you pity them, do so because of their tournament expenses.

B) You can like a character without deeming him/her your "favorite." Cyrax isn't my favorite, but I still love Cyrax. Him having 100% combos is just a bonus.

C) Tier-whores probably play the game more than you, and therefore are probably having more fun. Seriously, how many hours a week do you play Jade? If the question is "who is having the most fun playing MK9," I'm going to assume it's the people who play it more.

When I win against an opponent, it's awesome. When I win against a SMART opponent, an opponent who is reputable and has beaten skilled players alike, it is a feeling beyond description. You can't know what it's like until you've done it.

And I did it with my favorite character. Trust me guys, I know where ya'll are coming from, but it's not that black and white.

MrRolex Wrote:
Sub Zero was never under any circumstances one of the top characters in MK9.

It depends on what you mean by top, but if NRS had let him keep his resets, he would have been top ten. He's not even that bad now; he just has some bad 7-3's.

Tom Brady thought Sub-Zero was top tier because (like all of us) he didn't understand how footsies worked in MK9. No one did. It was a brand new engine. However, this is a game he co-authored the guide for, and with the backdrop MK9's history, he may be onto something.
Also, not everything Brady said was wrong. He was sure as hell right about Sheeva.

NoobSaibot5 Wrote:
I don't go by tiers, and I think it's laughable when people flock to characters just because one guy says they are good.

The player who plays a character he hates because of tier rank is a myth. No one actually does that. Meta-Knight, Kabal, Third Strike Chun-Li... these are great characters. Is it so crazy that the person playing them to improve their chances may also like the characters themselves?

Just Wong's favorite character is Chun Li, but he doesn't use her because he doesn't like charge characters. People then asked him why he doesn't use Cammy or Fei Long, and he said "because I don't connect with them personally. I have to like character."

It's a balance, guys.
Avatar
oracle
Avatar
About Me

-sig by MINION

04/08/2013 01:44 AM (UTC)
0
I was going to use Aquaman regardless.
Avatar
Jaded-Raven
04/08/2013 01:53 AM (UTC)
0
TemperaryUserName Wrote:
Oh boy...

Jaded-Raven Wrote:
I feel it is a bit sad that people choose a character depending on the "tier", because that means we will see ALOT of one or two characters online and none of the other characters. When playing online in MK, I saw alot of Scorpions and Kung Laos, when I played SSF4 online, I saw alot of Ryus, Kens and Sagats, and they were ALL doing the same thing! That's not fun. It's boring as hell! So I more or less stopped playing fighting games online.

I don't think your perspective is unhealthy, but I think your thesis about the low-tier players "having more fun" is WAY off. Three reasons:

A) winning, in of itself, is fun. To speak about tier-whores like they sold their souls to win is kinda baseless. They're having fun just like you. If you pity them, do so because of their tournament expenses.

B) You can like a character without deeming him/her your "favorite." Cyrax isn't my favorite, but I still love Cyrax. Him having 100% combos is just a bonus.

C) Tier-whores probably play the game more than you, and therefore are probably having more fun. Seriously, how many hours a week do you play Jade?

When I win against an opponent, it's awesome. When I win against a SMART opponent, an opponent who is reputable and has beaten skilled players alike, it is a feeling beyond description. You can't know what it's like until you've done it.

And I did it with my favorite character. Trust me guys, I know where ya'll are coming from, but it's not that black and white.


Whoa, overreaction much? I never used words as "tier-whores" or said they were selling their souls, nor did I imply such. And I never implied that you liking a character meant it would have to be your favourite. Also, you say playing a game means having more fun... So quantity over quality? I play MK when I feel like playing and then enjoy it, I don't have to play it constantly to have more fun. I have more in life than MK and can have fun in many other ways than playing MK. And I do not need to win to have fun. I'm not competetive in nature, so I do not feel the need to be better than others to feel good about myself.
Avatar
TemperaryUserName
Avatar
About Me
New sig on the way
04/08/2013 02:08 AM (UTC)
0
Jaded-Raven Wrote:
Whoa, overreaction much?

Oh, I'm not upset or anything. It's just a complicated point. There was a lot of write, lol.

Jaded-Raven Wrote:
I never used words as "tier-whores"

Tier-whore is my term for them, but to me, tier-whore isn't a bad word. Kinda like "broken" wasn't originally a bad word until the new generation of gamers.

Jaded-Raven Wrote:
... or said they were selling their souls, nor did I imply such.

You're right. That was a misunderstanding on my part. I misread the part where you said you were said that people picked their character based on tier. Your reasoning was because of character saturation, but I read it as because their gaming experience was somehow deficient.

My points still stand though even if they don't apply directly to your post.

Jaded-Raven Wrote:
Also, you say playing a game means having more fun... So quantity over quality?

I don't think their missing out on the quality, though. I think by learning different levels of the game, they're getting more out of it.

Now if someone doesn't want to put in the time to get to that level, I get that. For all the time I put into fighting games, I could have learned another musical instrument. The time investment required for fighting games is overwhelming, and it's definitely not for everyone. My only point was the question of "who's getting more out of their experience."
Avatar
Jaded-Raven
04/08/2013 02:17 AM (UTC)
0
TemperaryUserName Wrote:
Jaded-Raven Wrote:
Whoa, overreaction much?

Oh, I'm not upset or anything. It's just a complicated point. There was a lot of write, lol.

Jaded-Raven Wrote:
I never used words as "tier-whores"

Tier-whore is my term for them, but to me, tier-whore isn't a bad word. Kinda like "broken" wasn't originally a bad word until the new generation of gamers.

Jaded-Raven Wrote:
... or said they were selling their souls, nor did I imply such.

You're right. That was a misunderstanding on my part. I misread the part where you said you were sad that people picked their character based on tier. Your reasoning was because of character saturation, but I read it as because their gaming experience was somehow deficient.

My points still stand though even if they don't apply directly to your post.

Jaded-Raven Wrote:
Also, you say playing a game means having more fun... So quantity over quality?

I don't think their missing out on the quality, though. I think by learning different levels of the game, they're getting more out of it.

Now if someone doesn't want to put in the time to get to that level, I get it. For all the time I put into fighting games, I could have learned another musical instrument. My only point was the question of "who's getting more out of their experience."


Thank you for explaining in a less... aggressive manner. ^^

All in all, what I find fun is just not what those looking for tiers and are competetive in nature finds fun. I just didn't like to be beaten by every Kung Lao player doing the same combo again and again and again, or Ryu spamming Hadoukens at me, because then it wasn't fun for me to play the game. I have no qualms with losing matches, but I would also like to enjoy playing the game which is rendered impossible against those guys. I find it boring to play against people who repeats the same pattern over and over again, because they find it more efficient to win that way. Because to me, playing with others is not about winning or gaining points. Sure, I will do an effort to win, but it is not my main concern.

Edit: I found a better way to explain it!
It's like with music. I personally like to listen to different numbers of an artist or just generally listen to different kinds of music, whatever I am in the mood for. While I see those competetive players to be people who find one number they like and then they play that number over and over again...
Avatar
TemperaryUserName
Avatar
About Me
New sig on the way
04/08/2013 02:27 AM (UTC)
0
It's always a challenge to manage tone on the internet. Until I re-read my post a second or third time, I can't gauge how it's going to come off.

What seems like aggression is actually passion. In the context of a disagreement, that can be easily misconstrued That kind of stuff always rubbed Pink Ranger the wrong way, and I guess that's why she left the site (or whatever it is that happened to her; no one ever gave me the full story).
Avatar
[Killswitch]
Avatar
About Me

Shao Kahn did nothing wrong

04/08/2013 02:29 AM (UTC)
0
I didn't see any agression in the first place, but anyways, yaaaaaaaay. Probably gonna see a butt load of AM now online for a while.
Avatar
Nephrite
04/08/2013 09:29 AM (UTC)
0
MrRolex Wrote:
Sub Zero was never under any circumstances one of the top characters in MK9.
When the game was first released, Kung Lao and Cyrax were broken and way above everyone else. Kabal, Jax and certain others were also above SZ.


I disagree. Subby wasn't the best, but he was up there. Not only did he have massive damage resets but even more importantly (imo) other characters didn't have shittons of armor like they do now.

No way early Jax was better than early Sub-Zero. Jax is one of the characters who got buffed the most, he didn't have armor on his enhanced dash punch originally, he couldn't cancel his ground pounds and if I'm not mistaken his projectiles had more recovery frames.

Even now after all the buffs for Jax he's like upper mid-tier and Sub-Zero after all the nerfs is lower mid-tier. When you undo the changes they and other characters have gone through (like Reptile getting armor on his en. slide, Cage getting armor on his en. shadow kick, Sonya's en. cartwheel getting more frames of armor -> all these hurt Sub-Zero and his ice-cone game) there's no way original Jax was better than original Sub-Zero.

Also, saying Kung Lao and Cyrax were way above everyone else is debatable and probably not true because Kabal back then had a f+3, 2 ~ NDC infinite and we all know how good Kabal is without the infinite.
Avatar
Siroj
Avatar
About Me

04/08/2013 10:04 AM (UTC)
0
I agree with some of the sentiments here. I have much more respect for a player who sticks with a character he likes, even if said character is rarely picked for competitive play, than for a player who jumps on the top tier bandwagon.

I remember this one time during SSF4 main days, when Justin Wong and Daigo played an exhibition match where Daigo picked Guile. Now Guile wasn't a character that a lot of people played. Until Daigo managed to win one round, and than had the match end in a draw. It didn't take long for the Guile forum on srk.com to become the center of attention, even if it was just for a few days.

That's the dominant spirit of the FGC, it seems. See a pro owning it up with a certain character, and then try to imitate him.

Just like people all went to Kung Lao at the beginning of MK, I'm sure the character that will be played the most is the one that wins the first (couple of) tournament(s).

And here I am, still playing Sheeva and Quan Chi. tongue
Pages: 2
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
© 1998-2024 Shadow Knight Media, LLC. All rights reserved. Read our Privacy Policy.
Mortal Kombat, the dragon logo and all character names are trademarks and copyright of Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.