Avatar
KenshiMaster16
12/05/2015 06:02 PM (UTC)
0
ProfesserAhnka Wrote:
Why in the hell would WB choose Leatherface? Texas Chainsaw 3D was released damn near three years ago and bombed hard- and the upcoming film still has no release date.


Because horror flicks film fast and release fast, generally speaking, and it's still being eyed for next year. As is a new Halloween film, which is probably why Mikey Myers was considered. It's all about raising brand awareness. Nothing more, nothing less.
Avatar
QueenAhnka
Avatar
About Me

Rebel. Outsider. Fan Of The Obscure. Politically Incorrect. Spitfire!

12/05/2015 06:22 PM (UTC)
0
KenshiMaster16 Wrote:
ProfesserAhnka Wrote:
Why in the hell would WB choose Leatherface? Texas Chainsaw 3D was released damn near three years ago and bombed hard- and the upcoming film still has no release date.


Because horror flicks film fast and release fast, generally speaking, and it's still being eyed for next year. As is a new Halloween film, which is probably why Mikey Myers was considered. It's all about raising brand awareness. Nothing more, nothing less.


I still don't see WB forcing NRS to choose Leatherface over a plethora of other bankable options. I really don't. I'm sure that one was 100% NRS call.
Avatar
KenshiMaster16
12/05/2015 06:28 PM (UTC)
0
ProfesserAhnka Wrote:
KenshiMaster16 Wrote:
ProfesserAhnka Wrote:
Why in the hell would WB choose Leatherface? Texas Chainsaw 3D was released damn near three years ago and bombed hard- and the upcoming film still has no release date.


Because horror flicks film fast and release fast, generally speaking, and it's still being eyed for next year. As is a new Halloween film, which is probably why Mikey Myers was considered. It's all about raising brand awareness. Nothing more, nothing less.


I still don't see WB forcing NRS to choose Leatherface over a plethora of other bankable options. I really don't. I'm sure that one was 100% NRS call.


I really don't know who it came down to but I'm sure WB had a hand in it, maybe not forcing them though. It could also, as someone else pointed out, be simply a tribute since the original actor of Leatherface died this year. It could just be a multitude of reasons. But that still doesn't excuse how unnecessary his inclusion is.
Avatar
QueenAhnka
Avatar
About Me

Rebel. Outsider. Fan Of The Obscure. Politically Incorrect. Spitfire!

12/05/2015 06:40 PM (UTC)
0
FROST4584 Wrote:
Other than balance patches, after kombat pack 2, I hope NRS drops support for MKX. I'd rather have the most requested MK characters appear in MK11, rather than DLC for MKX. Seriously, what is the point of having Sareena or even Fujin at this point when MKX's prime is over. The player base is around 130 (room population) at least on PS4. I'd rather have Sareena in the next game with an updated graphics and fighting engine. Also, I hope the variation system doesn't return.

With the lame direction of the story,the writing, the reboot, the botched incorrect retelling of events of MK1 to MK3 , guest characters, dumbing down characters like Kitana and Milenna, countless rectons that ruin characters, half ass forced main protagonist characters that we were FORCED to follow like Shujinko, Taven, the Kombat Kids taking priority over the real characters trope. I miss John Tobias way of telling a story, the way he encompassed every character within a story, so that EVERYONE had a role to play AND shed light on who they are. This way , you weren't forced to following anyone story. Instead, you could pick any character and feel like you aren't playing someone less important. The last MK game to do this was, Deadly Alliance. I am near a breaking point with the MK series. It is like others have said, I feel like the MK team doesn't even know what makes MK special.


I enjoyed MK9 and MKX gameplay, but to me, MK lost its uniqueness. Now it is about nostalgia , rehashing, retelling, redoing, inserting modern hipster tropes, aka the kombat kids. The MK series hasn't really done anything exciting or anything new in almost 10 years plus (Armageddon turns ten next year). Of course I am looking toward MK11. Though, I fear what will they do to the characters and lore next. I am sure the gameplay will will be new and improved.

Myself, I won't purchase any of the KP2 characters. I've never liked Bo Rai Cho. Like all of the post MK4 characters, I hope they never return in a MK game. TriBorg sounds lame. I won't even mention other 2 guest characters. Tremor and Tanya are the only DLC I've bought. I've done my part in just saying NO to guest characters.


Well said. Mortal Kombat has been floating on a pool of nostalgia trips ever since Armageddon and the series in my opinion haven't truly progressed since Deadly Alliance and despite Shujinko being lame, I liked Deception's plot (The Dragon King, expanding the realms, more mythology) but we haven't truly had a MK game that have felt fresh in over a decade. Deadly Alliance in my opinion was the last solid Mortal Kombat game as far as story goes. The story has been drivel for the last ten years ever since Armageddon had its character bios fucking released online a month AFTER the game was released(I still haven't forgiven NRS for that bullshit) and despite MK9/MKX both having stellar gameplay, the story is shit, complete shit- the ball was dropped and there doesn't seem to be anyone giving a damn to pick up and write a decent story.

I also hope this is the end of DLC for MKX. NRS/WB had the potential to truly do something special with this game and really keep interest in MKX at an all time high long after release, but they once again dropped the ball. People have moved on, other bigger and better games are being released and are on the verge of being released and that desperate pack won't be enough to keep people interested, especially if they have to wait for some unspecified date in 2016 to have each character released once a fucking month- psh, this pack will go straight to the dumpster.
Avatar
QueenAhnka
Avatar
About Me

Rebel. Outsider. Fan Of The Obscure. Politically Incorrect. Spitfire!

12/05/2015 06:41 PM (UTC)
0
KenshiMaster16 Wrote:
ProfesserAhnka Wrote:
KenshiMaster16 Wrote:
ProfesserAhnka Wrote:
Why in the hell would WB choose Leatherface? Texas Chainsaw 3D was released damn near three years ago and bombed hard- and the upcoming film still has no release date.


Because horror flicks film fast and release fast, generally speaking, and it's still being eyed for next year. As is a new Halloween film, which is probably why Mikey Myers was considered. It's all about raising brand awareness. Nothing more, nothing less.


I still don't see WB forcing NRS to choose Leatherface over a plethora of other bankable options. I really don't. I'm sure that one was 100% NRS call.


I really don't know who it came down to but I'm sure WB had a hand in it, maybe not forcing them though. It could also, as someone else pointed out, be simply a tribute since the original actor of Leatherface died this year. It could just be a multitude of reasons. But that still doesn't excuse how unnecessary his inclusion is.


Agreed.
Avatar
redman
12/05/2015 06:53 PM (UTC)
0
I read (on reddit, I think) that the original actor who plays Leatherface was also close friends with Boon although I don't know how true that is. Anywho, I'm pretty excited for Bo' Rai Cho as others have been saying, and just thinking about him and the Smoke variation for Tri-Borg are making it easier on me. I am really excited to find new tech for Bo and to actually play the game again. Really curious about the Cyrax variation as well.

I will NEVER buy Leatherface or the Xenomorph though. No matter how awesome they make their gameplay, they're not going to be getting a cent from me for those two fuck ups.
Avatar
kamouniyak
12/05/2015 06:59 PM (UTC)
0
frabn Wrote:
AJBlue Wrote:
So many thoughts.

I'll start with this: Most of the people complaining are getting exactly what they deserve. The slippery slope started with Freddy's inclusion last game, but the majority of people were OK with having him in there. Those of us who complained were shouted down and told "It's DLC, no one is forcing you to buy it." That was your rallying cry and I'm glad it's being thrown back in your faces now. You don't like Leatherface? Well then don't buy him .

This is a business based on making money. Who was the biggest seller for DLC last game? Freddy. So now WB and NRS have a blueprint for profit and you can't be surprised that they ran with it.

Second, people absolutely were calling for Leatherface's inclusion. On this very board no less. Now I'm not saying it was a lot of posters, but I remember it well because I strained my eyes rolling them so much. People wanted a Horror/Halloween Pack and all because of the Pandora's box including Freddy Krueger unleashed. Maybe if more people complained and didn't buy Freddy we wouldn't be getting all the guest characters now.

Third, you can't please everybody and that's probably how NRS is approaching things now. There are people who love Rain and people who hate Rain. How do you appease both groups? You can't. There is always going to be some group who says "Why is so and so in the game and not this character?" I'll bet NRS is tired of the broken record they get every time they release a game.

Finally, and I have Mortal Kombat (2011) to thank for this, I've picked up the practice of not buying games until long after they're released. This way I can 1) save money, 2) see what DLC there is, and 3) wait for a potential Game of the Year/Complete edition. I was in no hurry to play this game (back log is too big admittedly) and when the price drops/"Komplete" edition comes out, I will have spent a fraction of the price compared to buying everything new. More importantly, I'll have experienced no disappointment or rage because I'll know exactly what I'm getting.


This is, and always has been, my stance. In true MKO fashion, I always got dragged through the coals over it. And now with KP2 people realize how true it rings.

"Enough with the guest characters. It's too much and we should get either more originals or 3d era characters" - frabn
"SHUT UP FRABN. FUCK YOU. GUEST CHARACTERS 4 LYFE!" - most MKO users

Now with the announcement of KP2 look where we're at.

If MKO has finally gotten sick of this, then things must be going in a bad way. With everyone claiming now that we should've had more post-MK4 era characters, I can't help but firmly agree. This KP2 announcement was a major disappointment all around. I love Alien but the design of it was terrible (even if preliminary). Tri-borg is decent in concept, and despite what MKO users are saying, this is something A LOT of people wanted. Bo Rai Cho was a good addition. Leatherface...F that noise.

I think we can probably agree on this little chart below here.

[existing character] > [character that should replace it]

Goro's roster spot >>> Rain
Liu Kang >>> Reiko
Kung Lao >>> Havik
Kitana >>> Tanya
Jax >>> Frost
Kombat Kid >>> Sareena
Kombat Kid >>> Fujin

KP1:
Bo Rai Cho
Ashrah
Taven or Daegon
Goro

KP2:
Cyrax or Sektor
Nitara
Taven or Daegon
Revenant Shao Kahn


Dream rosters are redundant, but w/e.



Awesome man! I would've totally bought those KPs.

I've always said that they should have went with more 3d characters
Avatar
KenshiMaster16
12/05/2015 07:11 PM (UTC)
0
redman Wrote:
I read (on reddit, I think) that the original actor who plays Leatherface was also close friends with Boon although I don't know how true that is. Anywho, I'm pretty excited for Bo' Rai Cho as others have been saying, and just thinking about him and the Smoke variation for Tri-Borg are making it easier on me. I am really excited to find new tech for Bo and to actually play the game again. Really curious about the Cyrax variation as well.

I will NEVER buy Leatherface or the Xenomorph though. No matter how awesome they make their gameplay, they're not going to be getting a cent from me for those two fuck ups.


This. Bo' Rai Cho (who I've wanted in this game since Day One) and The Pit are the things I'll be buying 100%. As long as they don't over-do it with the fart gags, I think his drunken style (as Boon confirmed it'll be returning) is gonna be the most fun thing about him. Tri-borg depends on how nerfed each entity is because of variation limitations but I would be open to purchasing him if it's not too terrible. The guests I refuse to purchase though no matter how good they are solely because of principle at this point.
Avatar
QueenAhnka
Avatar
About Me

Rebel. Outsider. Fan Of The Obscure. Politically Incorrect. Spitfire!

12/05/2015 07:23 PM (UTC)
0
kamouniyak Wrote:
frabn Wrote:
AJBlue Wrote:
So many thoughts.

I'll start with this: Most of the people complaining are getting exactly what they deserve. The slippery slope started with Freddy's inclusion last game, but the majority of people were OK with having him in there. Those of us who complained were shouted down and told "It's DLC, no one is forcing you to buy it." That was your rallying cry and I'm glad it's being thrown back in your faces now. You don't like Leatherface? Well then don't buy him .

This is a business based on making money. Who was the biggest seller for DLC last game? Freddy. So now WB and NRS have a blueprint for profit and you can't be surprised that they ran with it.

Second, people absolutely were calling for Leatherface's inclusion. On this very board no less. Now I'm not saying it was a lot of posters, but I remember it well because I strained my eyes rolling them so much. People wanted a Horror/Halloween Pack and all because of the Pandora's box including Freddy Krueger unleashed. Maybe if more people complained and didn't buy Freddy we wouldn't be getting all the guest characters now.

Third, you can't please everybody and that's probably how NRS is approaching things now. There are people who love Rain and people who hate Rain. How do you appease both groups? You can't. There is always going to be some group who says "Why is so and so in the game and not this character?" I'll bet NRS is tired of the broken record they get every time they release a game.

Finally, and I have Mortal Kombat (2011) to thank for this, I've picked up the practice of not buying games until long after they're released. This way I can 1) save money, 2) see what DLC there is, and 3) wait for a potential Game of the Year/Complete edition. I was in no hurry to play this game (back log is too big admittedly) and when the price drops/"Komplete" edition comes out, I will have spent a fraction of the price compared to buying everything new. More importantly, I'll have experienced no disappointment or rage because I'll know exactly what I'm getting.


This is, and always has been, my stance. In true MKO fashion, I always got dragged through the coals over it. And now with KP2 people realize how true it rings.

"Enough with the guest characters. It's too much and we should get either more originals or 3d era characters" - frabn
"SHUT UP FRABN. FUCK YOU. GUEST CHARACTERS 4 LYFE!" - most MKO users

Now with the announcement of KP2 look where we're at.

If MKO has finally gotten sick of this, then things must be going in a bad way. With everyone claiming now that we should've had more post-MK4 era characters, I can't help but firmly agree. This KP2 announcement was a major disappointment all around. I love Alien but the design of it was terrible (even if preliminary). Tri-borg is decent in concept, and despite what MKO users are saying, this is something A LOT of people wanted. Bo Rai Cho was a good addition. Leatherface...F that noise.

I think we can probably agree on this little chart below here.

[existing character] > [character that should replace it]

Goro's roster spot >>> Rain
Liu Kang >>> Reiko
Kung Lao >>> Havik
Kitana >>> Tanya
Jax >>> Frost
Kombat Kid >>> Sareena
Kombat Kid >>> Fujin

KP1:
Bo Rai Cho
Ashrah
Taven or Daegon
Goro

KP2:
Cyrax or Sektor
Nitara
Taven or Daegon
Revenant Shao Kahn


Dream rosters are redundant, but w/e.



Awesome man! I would've totally bought those KPs.

I've always said that they should have went with more 3d characters


PERFECT, though instead of Taven and Daegon I'd have Sindel/Baraka to take their spots. But great roster, makes much better sense.
Avatar
QueenAhnka
Avatar
About Me

Rebel. Outsider. Fan Of The Obscure. Politically Incorrect. Spitfire!

12/05/2015 07:25 PM (UTC)
0
What pisses me off is some people are actually talking about buying every character EXCEPT Bo Rai Cho...


You know...the actual MK character...

ugh
Avatar
.
12/05/2015 07:54 PM (UTC)
0
Okay, I usually don't post here anymore, but I just have to point out the serious issues here, all of which show a significant decline in NRS's attentiveness to the series roster.

1. Baraka was literally replaced with a guest character.

2. The "new" character is literally a mashed clone of three existing characters.

3. There are two guest characters, one of which was never requested.

4. Of the four characters, only one is a veteran member of the series roster.


It is clear; merit is no longer their concern.
Avatar
DarkKard4
12/05/2015 08:17 PM (UTC)
0
what kills me most about these guest characters is the cool special moves they have could be given to some real MK characters. Especially the "lame" ones they didn't put much effort in from the past games.

Then again, i also could see them recycling the guest character's special moves in the future. Then said MK character who will receive those moves will be branded a "rip off". Same old Kira cycle.

well at least they didn't make anything new for Alien since supposedly hes just a clone of Baraka gameplay wise (i have no clue if its true or not, so feel free to correct me)
Avatar
etuisee
12/05/2015 08:17 PM (UTC)
0
Riyakou Wrote:
Okay, I usually don't post here anymore, but I just have to point out the serious issues here, all of which show a significant decline in NRS's attentiveness to the series roster.

1. Baraka was literally replaced with a guest character.

2. The "new" character is literally a mashed clone of three existing characters.

3. There are two guest characters, one of which was never requested.

4. Of the four characters, only one is a veteran member of the series roster.


It is clear; merit is no longer their concern.


Perfect summary of my emotions that i was unable to properly express because I'm still baffled by the reveal.
Avatar
Blade4693
12/05/2015 08:30 PM (UTC)
0
Actually, even though the movie its self was a joke, Texas Chainsaw 3D was a financial success.

I also am interested to know how everyone here seems to know that nobody asked for Leatherface? Hell I am a fan and I didn't, but if you guys think just because people on MKO, TYM, and TRMK weren't clamoring for him means nobody else did...c'mon, you know we don't represent the majority lol
Avatar
MKDennis1980
12/05/2015 08:37 PM (UTC)
0
Zero_Jade Wrote:
This is beyond disappointing - worse than my most pessimistic prediction...

Whilst I'm pleased to see Bo returning, two more guests is a joke when they've had so many requests for Fujin for TWO games now, as well as lots of requests for the likes of Rain, Baraka, Li Mei, Sareena etc.

Wow NRS, you really picked a cash grab over what your fans wanted. I'll be getting Bo but I won't touch the others, the same as how I only got Tanya in the last pack. The cyborg looks okay but honestly I'd rather have had one of the actual cyborgs returning. Way to troll Sektor and Baraka fans with that trailer, honestly don't know what they were thinking. I hope they know how much they've disappointed us all.

With 8 characters as DLC how is it only 2 of them are returning MK characters!? Then there are 2 semi-newbies and 4 guests... When the guest characters outnumber the characters from your actual franchise it doesn't suggest they have much faith in their fans who have supported them for years.


Damn good reaction totaly agreesmilegrin (page15)
Avatar
Demon_0
Avatar
About Me

Avatar is part of fanart created by Esau13

12/05/2015 08:45 PM (UTC)
0
Whats really sad is that they obviously have no faith in their own characters.
Avatar
Ninja_Mime
12/05/2015 09:21 PM (UTC)
0
Demon_0 Wrote:
Whats really sad is that they obviously have no faith in their own characters.


Brian Chard made it pretty clear on Twitter that the guest characters were WB's decision. NRS answers to them, and they seem to be trying their best to please everyone. Tri-Borg being what he is and Bo' Rai Cho of all characters making the cut is evidence of this.
Avatar
DarkKard4
12/05/2015 09:39 PM (UTC)
0
Demon_0 Wrote:
Whats really sad is that they obviously have no faith in their own characters.


Pretty much.

so much so that the only "new" characters were descendants of the classic characters. The lack of returning characters that weren't in MK9 says it all really. Tanya and Bo Rai Cho shouldn't have been DLC in the first place because they don't have enough exposure with the mainstream/casual audience for new players to want to buy them or try them out. Seriously, does NRS not use logic at all?? Give those DLC spots to Kitana, Liu Kang, or Kung lao who were merely revenants in this game anyways.

the starting roster was a MESS and it only became messier when they went into DLC. NRS are missing a big opportunity to revamp their under-developed characters from the 3D era and instead are giving guests all these cool move ideas and development. Not to mention, putting moves of shafted classic characters in the game on OTHER characters (Kitana - Jade / Xenomorph - Baraka) is a slap in the face to their fans.

at this point they should call the game MK vs. Hollywood. Its clear that real Mortal Kombat characters have officially taken a back seat.
Avatar
lastfighter89
12/05/2015 09:47 PM (UTC)
0
DarkKard4 Wrote:
Demon_0 Wrote:
Whats really sad is that they obviously have no faith in their own characters.


Pretty much.

so much so that the only "new" characters were descendants of the classic characters. The lack of returning characters that weren't in MK9 pretty much says it all really. Tanya and Bo Rai Cho shouldn't have been DLC in the first place because they don't have enough exposure with the mainstream/casual audience in the first place for new players to want to buy them or try them out. Give those DLC spots to Kitana, Liu Kang, or Kung lao who were merely revenants in this game anyways.

the starting roster was a MESS and it only became messier when they went into DLC. NRS are missing a big opportunity to revamp their under-developed characters from the 3D era and instead are giving guests all these cool move ideas and development. Not to mention, putting moves of shafted classic characters in the game on OTHER characters (Kitana - Jade / Xenomorph - Baraka) is a slap in the face to their fans.

at this point they should call the game MK vs. Hollywood. Its clear that real Mortal Kombat characters have officially taken a back seat.



While I do agree with you on this, Mournful Kitana was a necessary evil, exactly like stunt double cage and shirai ryu Takeda. Heck, even demolition Sonya reminds me of Stryker.

Nrs couldn't find three unique character variation for everyone, but the idea was cool, so they had to give partial moveset to other characters.

Mournful Kitana, SD Cage and others are not even "canon" in the story.
Have you noticed that cage uses ONLY the A-list variation in story mode?
Kitana sticks to her Assassin the whole time?

Some variations are non-canon, story mode made it quite frank of it.


Sometimes, gameplay has to have priority over story.

Of course, giving Alien some of Baraka's moves is plain stupid and quite offensive/provocative towards the average MK fan.
Avatar
Demon_0
Avatar
About Me

Avatar is part of fanart created by Esau13

12/05/2015 09:48 PM (UTC)
0
Ninja_Mime Wrote:
Demon_0 Wrote:
Whats really sad is that they obviously have no faith in their own characters.


Brian Chard made it pretty clear on Twitter that the guest characters were WB's decision. NRS answers to them, and they seem to be trying their best to please everyone. Tri-Borg being what he is and Bo' Rai Cho of all characters making the cut is evidence of this.


You know, I just read his tweets and its indeed clear to me now that WB has a lot to say on the matter, more than I was willing to admit. Its a darn shame, though, cause they seem to be making all decisions in favor of the casuals which is strange at this point.

I mean, KP1 made sense. It was released not long after the game and it contained characters that would appeal to the casual gamer. But, as someone already mentioned, the casuals shouldn't have the upper hand at this point given that the majority of these players have most likely dropped the game. One more guest character would have been fine, but two? I mean, in a roster of 33 characters, 4 are guests. Thats just too much.

Also, why BRC over Fujin? Is it just me or did Fujin win every poll over BRC?
Avatar
redman
12/05/2015 10:12 PM (UTC)
0
Demon_0 Wrote:
Ninja_Mime Wrote:
Demon_0 Wrote:
Whats really sad is that they obviously have no faith in their own characters.


Brian Chard made it pretty clear on Twitter that the guest characters were WB's decision. NRS answers to them, and they seem to be trying their best to please everyone. Tri-Borg being what he is and Bo' Rai Cho of all characters making the cut is evidence of this.


You know, I just read his tweets and its indeed clear to me now that WB has a lot to say on the matter, more than I was willing to admit. Its a darn shame, though, cause they seem to be making all decisions in favor of the casuals which is strange at this point.

I mean, KP1 made sense. It was released not long after the game and it contained characters that would appeal to the casual gamer. But, as someone already mentioned, the casuals shouldn't have the upper hand at this point given that the majority of these players have most likely dropped the game. One more guest character would have been fine, but two? I mean, in a roster of 33 characters, 4 are guests. Thats just too much.

Also, why BRC over Fujin? Is it just me or did Fujin win every poll over BRC?


Well, yeah, Fujin was undoubtedly in the top 3 of most requested, but BRC seems more like they're taking a chance with him. Most fans hate him although a lot of the hardcore fans like him, he wasn't really expected to make it imo. He's a very odd choice but I have to applaud them for at least giving him a chance to shine in this game. Like others are saying, maybe they actually are saving Fujin and others for MK11, or maybe they just don't like Fujin and BRC seems like something they would be able to work with better. Still, I feel like they should have taken the leap and just excluded guests out of KP2.
Avatar
.
12/06/2015 12:19 AM (UTC)
0
Demon_0 Wrote:
Ninja_Mime Wrote:
Demon_0 Wrote:
Whats really sad is that they obviously have no faith in their own characters.


Brian Chard made it pretty clear on Twitter that the guest characters were WB's decision. NRS answers to them, and they seem to be trying their best to please everyone. Tri-Borg being what he is and Bo' Rai Cho of all characters making the cut is evidence of this.


You know, I just read his tweets and its indeed clear to me now that WB has a lot to say on the matter, more than I was willing to admit. Its a darn shame, though, cause they seem to be making all decisions in favor of the casuals which is strange at this point.

I mean, KP1 made sense. It was released not long after the game and it contained characters that would appeal to the casual gamer. But, as someone already mentioned, the casuals shouldn't have the upper hand at this point given that the majority of these players have most likely dropped the game. One more guest character would have been fine, but two? I mean, in a roster of 33 characters, 4 are guests. Thats just too much.

Also, why BRC over Fujin? Is it just me or did Fujin win every poll over BRC?


This has gone far beyond the casuals. They are trying to attract the unfamiliar.

Most casual MK players are still longtime fans, like myself. They know the game through and through and expect certain things. Thus, most casual players would not care for so many guests, if any. The unfamiliar, however, those who don't know much about MK beyond Scorpion and Sub-Zero, are the ones who will fall for the guests.

WB has chosen to forsake the fans, both casual and otherwise, because they know there are more unfamiliar people than fans. The problem here is NRS agreeing to go through with it.
Avatar
QueenAhnka
Avatar
About Me

Rebel. Outsider. Fan Of The Obscure. Politically Incorrect. Spitfire!

12/06/2015 01:18 AM (UTC)
0
Blade4693 Wrote:
Actually, even though the movie its self was a joke, Texas Chainsaw 3D was a financial success.



Meh, it did double its budget which is good but it wasn't exactly a money machine like Friday The 13th (2009) and Nightmare On Elm Street (2010) which both made $92 Million and $110 Million on simelar budgets.

TC3D made its costs back and then some, but it was in no way a giant hit- which is why its been almost three years with no sequel (Though a new one filmed earlier this year and will probably be released later in 2016 but theres no official release date or anything new) and before that the series was dead for seven straight years.

My point is I believe the story of Gunner Hansen (who portrayed Leatherface in the original film) was very close friends with Boon and they decided to include him as a tribute to Gunner who recently passed. I buy that more than WB randomly pushing for Leatherface when they had so many other bankable options at their disposal (Terminator, Mad Max character, Batman or other DC characters, or hell even fucking Annabelle lol) all of which would've sold more than Leatherface.
Avatar
Uppercut Editions
Avatar
About Me

Uppercut Editions - Mortal Kombat Encyclopedia Project Creator and Manager - Join Our Fight and Like the Mortal Kombat Encyclopedia Project on Facebook and Twitter -

12/06/2015 01:25 AM (UTC)
0
Not always true about the WB/NRS relationship.

When we were doing the Kombatpedia thing and talking with DK Books, they and Warner Bros were VERY clear that the head of the MK IP (NRS/ Boon) had veto power over most decisions, including publications. This could be the same with the game decisions/ character choices.

I'm pretty sure Ed wanted Alien and Leatherface - Ed loves these guest characters, because guest characters mean $$$.
Avatar
Blade4693
12/06/2015 02:11 AM (UTC)
0
ProfesserAhnka Wrote:
Blade4693 Wrote:
Actually, even though the movie its self was a joke, Texas Chainsaw 3D was a financial success.



Meh, it did double its budget which is good but it wasn't exactly a money machine like Friday The 13th (2009) and Nightmare On Elm Street (2010) which both made $92 Million and $110 Million on simelar budgets.

TC3D made its costs back and then some, but it was in no way a giant hit- which is why its been almost three years with no sequel (Though a new one filmed earlier this year and will probably be released later in 2016 but theres no official release date or anything new) and before that the series was dead for seven straight years.

My point is I believe the story of Gunner Hansen (who portrayed Leatherface in the original film) was very close friends with Boon and they decided to include him as a tribute to Gunner who recently passed. I buy that more than WB randomly pushing for Leatherface when they had so many other bankable options at their disposal (Terminator, Mad Max character, Batman or other DC characters, or hell even fucking Annabelle lol) all of which would've sold more than Leatherface.


Well yeah its not gonna make as much as FT13th or ANOES, TCM has kind of fallen behind those two (and Halloween) over the years. Think about it though, even though FT13th and ANOES made more, they came out before TCM3D and ANOES is not getting a sequel we know of yet, and Friday is getting another one but its postponed atm for some reason.

I have never heard of the thing about Hansen (R.I.P) being friends with Boon though, but if that was the real reason they included him (The one in the game does look to be modeled after Hansen's original portrayal) that would be really cool, I like that a lot better than WB making them include him because of Leatherface is in the works lol

Maybe somebody with a twitter could ask Boon about the Gunnar Hansen thing so we can get some sort of confirmation lol
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
© 1998-2024 Shadow Knight Media, LLC. All rights reserved. Read our Privacy Policy.
Mortal Kombat, the dragon logo and all character names are trademarks and copyright of Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.