Can someone tell me Why they didn`t pick -men over dc?
Can someone tell me Why they didn`t pick -men over dc?
0
posted06/08/2008 12:46 AM (UTC)by

About Me
http://gametalk.netforums.us Join the greatest website ever Obama Or Fatality!
Member Since
06/01/2007 10:00 PM (UTC)
I wonder.Why they didn`t decide to have x-men.
These are the x-mens who can win in their battles againts mk.
1.Storm
2.Cyclops
3.Havok
4.Magneto
5.Wolverine
6.Mystique
7.Dark Phoneix
8.Jean Grey
9.Rogue
10.Iceman
11.Emma Frost
12.Forge
13.Nightcrawler
These are the x-mens who can win in their battles againts mk.
1.Storm
2.Cyclops
3.Havok
4.Magneto
5.Wolverine
6.Mystique
7.Dark Phoneix
8.Jean Grey
9.Rogue
10.Iceman
11.Emma Frost
12.Forge
13.Nightcrawler
0
Probably because Marvel is used the most for Crossovers and you don't see too much of DC fighting in a crossover. Plus, you have 3 too many.
CHEERS!
CHEERS!
About Me
What do you like? Hit the Toasty thumbs up on articles and forum posts for a quick response!
0
tonshaad1230 Wrote:
Can someone tell me Why they didn`t pick -men over dc?
Can someone tell me Why they didn`t pick -men over dc?
Pikmin would definitely be a better opponent!

0
Considering Capcom used Marvel characters for their games, I figure MK wanted to try something different. Besides, we don't know what went down behind the scenes...maybe they wanted to do something with Marvel, but couldn't come to an agreement. A lot of what we see has tons of politics around it...it's not as simple as just saying "let's do this because it would be cool."
About Me
What do you like? Hit the Toasty thumbs up on articles and forum posts for a quick response!
0
Kombat_Vet Wrote:
A lot of what we see has tons of politics around it...it's not as simple as just saying "let's do this because it would be cool."
A lot of what we see has tons of politics around it...it's not as simple as just saying "let's do this because it would be cool."
Spoilers: (Highlight to reveal)
Most companies didn't want to slum it with MK.
Most companies didn't want to slum it with MK.
0
And they have a good reason almost all fighting games are superior to MK tekken, virtua fighter, Soul calibur the list goes on and on I mean the new DBZ game looks cooler than MK.
Why would they want to lose their fan base just like the geniuses at MIDWAY did. Also boon says he is a fan of all the other fighting games I bet none of those devolpers would even think of playing MK. I mean everybody got what they wanted except us MK fans street fighter game tekken 6 etc.
Why would they want to lose their fan base just like the geniuses at MIDWAY did. Also boon says he is a fan of all the other fighting games I bet none of those devolpers would even think of playing MK. I mean everybody got what they wanted except us MK fans street fighter game tekken 6 etc.


0
mafiahajeri Wrote:
And they have a good reason almost all fighting games are superior to MK tekken, virtua fighter, Soul calibur the list goes on and on I mean the new DBZ game looks cooler than MK.
Why would they want to lose their fan base just like the geniuses at MIDWAY did. Also boon says he is a fan of all the other fighting games I bet none of those devolpers would even think of playing MK. I mean everybody got what they wanted except us MK fans street fighter game tekken 6 etc.
And they have a good reason almost all fighting games are superior to MK tekken, virtua fighter, Soul calibur the list goes on and on I mean the new DBZ game looks cooler than MK.
Why would they want to lose their fan base just like the geniuses at MIDWAY did. Also boon says he is a fan of all the other fighting games I bet none of those devolpers would even think of playing MK. I mean everybody got what they wanted except us MK fans street fighter game tekken 6 etc.
Every DBZ game looks the same there's nothing new all they do is add a character here or there but the story and everything else is the same.
0
Yeah but al least their loyal to the fans but this new one is different its really smooth and FUN to play thats the important thing also have you tried it????
firesnake Wrote:
Every DBZ game looks the same there's nothing new all they do is add a character here or there but the story and everything else is the same.
Every DBZ game looks the same there's nothing new all they do is add a character here or there but the story and everything else is the same.
Unlike MK, each new DBZ game improves the gameplay from the previous game. And it is actually fun to play. Heck, you even have more freedom when it comes to creating combos. And that with just one punch and kick button.
So the Story may always be the same, but the gameplay is actually good. Which is ultimately the important thing in a fighting game.


0
Nathan Wrote:
Unlike MK, each new DBZ game improves the gameplay from the previous game. And it is actually fun to play. Heck, you even have more freedom when it comes to creating combos. And that with just one punch and kick button.
Unlike MK, each new DBZ game improves the gameplay from the previous game. And it is actually fun to play. Heck, you even have more freedom when it comes to creating combos. And that with just one punch and kick button.
I dare say Tenkaichi was a step or two down from Budokai 3, actually.


About Me
Save a life; Kill a necromorph
0
Dragon Balls Z SUCKS. that is all i have to say about it.
Well, as much as Atari wants to sell it that way, the Budokai Tenkaichi games have nothing to do with the previous 3 Budokai games that came before it.
The normal Budokai series were developed by Dimps and the Tenkaichi games were developed by Spike and were supposed to be more like DBZ simulators than traditional fighting games.
Games developed by Dimps.
- Budokai
- Budokai 2
- Budokai 3
- Shin Budokai
- Shin Budokai 2
- Budokai Burst Limit
So, with every new game released by Dimps the gameplay improved more and more.
The normal Budokai series were developed by Dimps and the Tenkaichi games were developed by Spike and were supposed to be more like DBZ simulators than traditional fighting games.
Games developed by Dimps.
- Budokai
- Budokai 2
- Budokai 3
- Shin Budokai
- Shin Budokai 2
- Budokai Burst Limit
So, with every new game released by Dimps the gameplay improved more and more.
0
I hate DBZ. it's not fun to play, and yes I have played it.
0
Well thats your opininon but its much more funner than RECENT MK games well anything is except SM whitch you cant really compared but I really like SM. Did you try the burst limit DEMO the new one???? its much more different.
0
How many times must we see the same ranting threads on here?
lol
Ohh yeah but what Subfrost said.
Marvel's been there, done that while MK and DC are two franchises yet to have a crossover...
lol
Ohh yeah but what Subfrost said.
0
Your opinion. I actually liked the recent MK games. They're not the best games but I find them enjoyable.


0
mafiahajeri Wrote:
And they have a good reason almost all fighting games are superior to MK tekken, virtua fighter, Soul calibur the list goes on and on I mean the new DBZ game looks cooler than MK.
Very true BUT none of these franchises take the risks that Mortal Kombat has and thats why this franchise is still around.
And they have a good reason almost all fighting games are superior to MK tekken, virtua fighter, Soul calibur the list goes on and on I mean the new DBZ game looks cooler than MK.
Very true BUT none of these franchises take the risks that Mortal Kombat has and thats why this franchise is still around.


About Me
http://gametalk.netforums.us Join the greatest website ever Obama Or Fatality!
0
I know X-men had their time for a crossover with streetfighter.But,When i was playing Xmen legends 1 and 2 acoplyoese,It gave me a thrill.Next time if mk does have a crossover(which ill doubt it),maybe picking xmen next time. 
0
Risk what risks?? the only risks I see that they have taken is releasing crap games,lol.
0
DBZ games better then MK? ok someones smoking some strong shit lol...
SC 3 sucked and just in case some haven't noticed is taking shit from MK now with "finishers" please...
SC 3 sucked and just in case some haven't noticed is taking shit from MK now with "finishers" please...
About Me
I need a new sig, something with Kabal from UMK3 would be sweet. Just imagine that here
0
Mick-Lucifer Wrote:
Pikmin would definitely be a better opponent!
tonshaad1230 Wrote:
Can someone tell me Why they didn`t pick -men over dc?
Can someone tell me Why they didn`t pick -men over dc?
Pikmin would definitely be a better opponent!
Damn! you beat me to that joke!
0
Recent MK games have failed to deliver good and FUN gameplay its the stiffest fighting game out there and its NOT fun to play well thats only if you are a fanboy and your blinded by the characters and story and dont care about how crap the gameplay is.
mkflegend Wrote:
DBZ games better then MK? ok someones smoking some strong shit lol...
DBZ games better then MK? ok someones smoking some strong shit lol...
Oh, believe it. Just because it's an Anime based game, it shouldn't be looked down upon.
SC 3 sucked and just in case some haven't noticed is taking shit from MK now with "finishers" please...
I don't know what it is that makes people live in denial. I like the Mortal Kombat mythology and it's characters as much as the next person, but I can admit that it can't compete with the majority of other fighters out there.
And as far as finishers go, I'd laugh, it'd be sad but I'd laugh, when SCVI manags to do a better job with the Finishers than Mortal Kombat does.
0
The gameplay needs work in the past few MKD's but MKA was actually a lot better believe it not, trust me I'm a high level player that plays online constantly..I know.
MKD had tons of glitches, it wasn't that playable. MKA has some problems but it's not nearly as bad as MKD's. And factually MK:DA was the best balance and glitch wise, so to say all 3 are all bad is not true.
Not as good as the older MK's, that's true but they're not "ultra horrible" like some people make them out to be either...
I've played those games, they all suck except GT and the one for Wii was alright. The newer one looks not bad, but I'm talking overall as a series...MK is much better overall then DBZ is. Nobody even talks about those games, heck lol I see more people talking about KI a series that died years ago then DBZ on here and in general.
Actually, MK CAN compete...you see people forget that MK2 and UMK3 besides the newer games, those two mainly are always stilled played online in the competition world. Again, believe me I'm one of them and always play the "more competitive MK's out there" online whenever I can. SC series isn't all that, the second one was very good and the earlier once were fun but SC3 wasn't very good. It disappointed many fans, had no online play, a crappy KAK system and was PS2 exclusive only....
lol, SC4 won't do a better job then MK with it...I've seen the pics and read the article....they even admit they were inspired or stole the idea from MK's fatalities and SF's "supers".....I guess when you're struggling to get new creative ideas, you steal from other games. It's a one hit kill which will be abused....and then there's the gimmick of adding Vader and Yoda to try to get that "SC2 flare" again since it worked with Link and Spawn...

MKD had tons of glitches, it wasn't that playable. MKA has some problems but it's not nearly as bad as MKD's. And factually MK:DA was the best balance and glitch wise, so to say all 3 are all bad is not true.
Not as good as the older MK's, that's true but they're not "ultra horrible" like some people make them out to be either...
Nathan Wrote:
Oh, believe it. Just because it's an Anime based game, it shouldn't be looked down upon.
I don't know what it is that makes people live in denial. I like the Mortal Kombat mythology and it's characters as much as the next person, but I can admit that it can't compete with the majority of other fighters out there.
And as far as finishers go, I'd laugh, it'd be sad but I'd laugh, when SCVI manags to do a better job with the Finishers than Mortal Kombat does.
mkflegend Wrote:
DBZ games better then MK? ok someones smoking some strong shit lol...
DBZ games better then MK? ok someones smoking some strong shit lol...
Oh, believe it. Just because it's an Anime based game, it shouldn't be looked down upon.
SC 3 sucked and just in case some haven't noticed is taking shit from MK now with "finishers" please...
I don't know what it is that makes people live in denial. I like the Mortal Kombat mythology and it's characters as much as the next person, but I can admit that it can't compete with the majority of other fighters out there.
And as far as finishers go, I'd laugh, it'd be sad but I'd laugh, when SCVI manags to do a better job with the Finishers than Mortal Kombat does.
I've played those games, they all suck except GT and the one for Wii was alright. The newer one looks not bad, but I'm talking overall as a series...MK is much better overall then DBZ is. Nobody even talks about those games, heck lol I see more people talking about KI a series that died years ago then DBZ on here and in general.
Actually, MK CAN compete...you see people forget that MK2 and UMK3 besides the newer games, those two mainly are always stilled played online in the competition world. Again, believe me I'm one of them and always play the "more competitive MK's out there" online whenever I can. SC series isn't all that, the second one was very good and the earlier once were fun but SC3 wasn't very good. It disappointed many fans, had no online play, a crappy KAK system and was PS2 exclusive only....
lol, SC4 won't do a better job then MK with it...I've seen the pics and read the article....they even admit they were inspired or stole the idea from MK's fatalities and SF's "supers".....I guess when you're struggling to get new creative ideas, you steal from other games. It's a one hit kill which will be abused....and then there's the gimmick of adding Vader and Yoda to try to get that "SC2 flare" again since it worked with Link and Spawn...
© 1998-2025 Shadow Knight Media, LLC. All rights reserved. Mortal Kombat, the dragon logo and all character names are trademarks and copyright of Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.