Should Sub-zero be immune to supermans Ice Breath? Ed Boon is thinking about it.
0
posted10/14/2008 01:09 PM (UTC)by
Avatar
rdthelegend1
Avatar
Member Since
04/25/2008 05:23 AM (UTC)
I'm not sure if some one broth this up already, but i was just asking because ed boon was thinking about it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XOpcz1OSFXw
Avatar
Joe-Von-Zombie
Avatar
About Me

Sig by MINION

10/10/2008 06:43 PM (UTC)
0
for balance reasons, no he shouldn't be.
Avatar
rdthelegend1
10/10/2008 07:17 PM (UTC)
0
yeah i agree. that sub shouldn't be immune.
Avatar
Nathan
Avatar
About Me

10/10/2008 07:25 PM (UTC)
0
Yes, for balance reasons probably not totally immune, but I always thought certain characters should be more resistant against attacks that are of the same element as the attacks they use. Or like Scorpion who's practically a hellspawn, should laugh, or at least shrug it off, when someone tries to use fire on him.

So for example, if someone uses a fire move on Scorpion, he should take reduced damage, but be immune to effects caused by the fire. Like getting knocked off balance, stuns, attack interuption or whatever it's called. In short, he should be able to keep attacking while taking the damage.

For Sub-Zero, I'd give him reduced damage against ice attacks and reduced stun time. So he doesn't remain frozen for as long as the other characters.
Avatar
T-rex
Avatar
About Me

10/10/2008 07:48 PM (UTC)
0
You know what was awesome in MKDA and onwards? How Kenshi was immune to Sonya and Kira's blinding dust,which is great because it makes total sense.

As for Sub,eh,it could go both ways.
Avatar
LittleDudeNT5
10/10/2008 08:35 PM (UTC)
0
No he shouldn't be Immune. Was he immune to Frost's attacks?
Avatar
Shinomune
10/10/2008 08:44 PM (UTC)
0
Or female characters to Johnny Cage's nutpunch grin
he should.


makes things more strategic and interesting.
Avatar
TheAdder
10/11/2008 02:24 AM (UTC)
0
Only if Superman takes reduced damage from being punched or kicked and the opponent suffers recoil.

I mean, hey, if we're going with things they should be immune to we should go all the way. Superman's invulnerability super power can be negated by magic, but he's still a Kryptonian and, as such, his body is naturally 10x denser than any human's.

And while we're at it, let's make Raiden immune to lightning.

And let's make Captain Marvel immune to everything BUT lightning.

And let's make Flash impossible to actually hit.

If you can't tell, I am being facetious and feel making Sub-z immune to freezing is stupid as he has never been shown to be immune to it before.
Avatar
Mick-Lucifer
Avatar
About Me

What do you like? Hit the Toasty thumbs up on articles and forum posts for a quick response!
10/11/2008 02:45 AM (UTC)
0
rdthelegend1 Wrote:
Sould Sub-zero be immune to supermans Ice Breath?

Too much of the game is built on the concessions of game mechanic.
If they're going to introduce a sense of realism uniquely logical to each character, then they need to do it across the board. With the misgivings most have about the balance of MK games, this would probably create a lot more trouble than it's worth.

If Sub-Zero's immune to ice (perfectly logical), then Raiden should be immune to electricity (and maybe more), Superman should be super-strong and have a long health bar, Batman should to interact with environments more freely and be more nimble, Flash should be able to move at super-speeds in all of his actions...

It's a pandoras box that could only work with broad commitment.


Soft mechanics that fit into the basic structure aren't bad though.
Sub-Zero's immunity gives him a singular advantage not attached to any mechanic. I appreciated some of the dabbling they did in MKDA with character logics like Nitara and Shang Tsung (health stealing), and the impale moves. All designed within the structure of a special move -- the conceit of the game mechanics.
Avatar
Icebaby
10/11/2008 03:07 AM (UTC)
0
It would make perfect sense, but yet again, then you'll have characters that will be immune to others as what Mick stated. Then it'll be no fun anymore when majority of the characters are immuned to something else. What fun would that be? But it does make sense, but think about it, for some reason I can't put it in words too clearly but this subject brought up about Frost and Sub-Zero's medallion.

But yet again, that's a whole different story and she couldn't contain it's power and it froze her, but something tells me that this litlte story plays something in how to decifier if Sub-Zero should be immune. I'm probably not making any sense right now, so I'm probably gonna end it right here.
Avatar
rdthelegend1
10/11/2008 03:13 AM (UTC)
0
Icebaby Wrote:
I'm probably not making any sense right now, so I'm probably gonna end it right here.


i understand what you are saying.
Avatar
Mick-Lucifer
Avatar
About Me

What do you like? Hit the Toasty thumbs up on articles and forum posts for a quick response!
10/11/2008 03:14 AM (UTC)
0
Icebaby Wrote:
It would make perfect sense, but yet again, then you'll have characters that will be immune to others as what Mick stated. Then it'll be no fun anymore when majority of the characters are immuned to something else. What fun would that be?

Yeah, it'd be fantastic if they were doing it with everyone!
I mean, that's half the fun of the superhero environment.

Superman could beat the shit out of half these guys, but Lex Luthor (and Batman) have a habit of carrying Kryptonite around and could take him out, even though Lex would get beaten by a host of other characters (ie; Captain Marvel).

The character/plot driven dynamics are why there are far fewer complaints from fanboys about the similarities between Superman and Captain Marvel. They're used to thinking with their heads, rather than their thumbs.

Most games - fighters included - definitely seem to be heading toward some sort of hyper realism and this would be a great step! It would just need to be part of the thinking process from the very beginning, rather than something slapped on for one or two favourite characters.

Given how comfortable most MK fans seem to be with the clunky simplicity of uniform fight styles, it might also be too much of a risk if they're relying on moderate successes from every game. I don't know. It might be soft enough a change to sneak through, as opposed to say, the example of removing the HUD.
Avatar
Vash_15
Avatar
About Me
10/11/2008 04:28 AM (UTC)
0
Honestly, that's like saying Sub-Zero shouldn't be able to freeze himself if it's Sub vs Sub
Avatar
Shibata
10/11/2008 07:25 AM (UTC)
0
Good call on the Sub Zero vs Zub Zero thing. Wassupwitdat.

I'm not opposed to the idea, but I think you know, you can't really just do it for one character. If you're going to do something like that you need to apply the concept to every character. Which I think would be really cool, but potentially gamebreaking. Given who's working on this game I don't really want it attempted. Basics first.
Avatar
PapaRoachFan
10/11/2008 01:07 PM (UTC)
0
And Al Gore was thinking about running for president this election.
Avatar
Zentile
10/11/2008 01:32 PM (UTC)
0
Scorpion should be immune to Green Lantern's powers.
Avatar
Mick-Lucifer
Avatar
About Me

What do you like? Hit the Toasty thumbs up on articles and forum posts for a quick response!
10/11/2008 03:28 PM (UTC)
0
Zentile Wrote:
Scorpion should be immune to Green Lantern's powers.

Fifteen years ago, chief!

Vash_15 Wrote:
Honestly, that's like saying Sub-Zero shouldn't be able to freeze himself if it's Sub vs Sub

That's right.
This is a problem why, exactly?
Avatar
VenomMelendez
10/11/2008 03:30 PM (UTC)
0
Joe-Von-Zombie Wrote:
for balance reasons, no he shouldn't be.




Agreed.


otherwise, wouldn't he be immune to himself in a Sub-Zero vs Sub-Zero fight?
Avatar
wilkins36
Avatar
About Me

Here We Go Brownies!

10/11/2008 04:18 PM (UTC)
0
To make this game complete this kind of detail is needed. It makes sense, Forget the balance Sub-Zero and Superman are unlikely to meet often enough to make this a serious balance issue. Superman has many moves I would love to see this addition.
Avatar
DigitalAssassin
10/11/2008 04:26 PM (UTC)
0
I think he should. Wouldnt be the 1st... lol obviously johnny cage couldnt do the nut breaker on the female fighters and kenshi wasnt affected by sonyas kiss off death
Avatar
Medusa
10/13/2008 12:35 AM (UTC)
0
T-rex Wrote:
You know what was awesome in MKDA and onwards? How Kenshi was immune to Sonya and Kira's blinding dust,which is great because it makes total sense.






Agreed.
It would be logical for immunity or complete resistance.
Avatar
Mick-Lucifer
Avatar
About Me

What do you like? Hit the Toasty thumbs up on articles and forum posts for a quick response!
10/13/2008 01:55 AM (UTC)
0
Medusa Wrote:
It would be logical for immunity or complete resistance.

Or for the moves to have no effect!
Avatar
ThePredator151
Avatar
About Me
The Ultimate Mortal Kombat Experience
- Lead Graphic Designer - Mortal Kombat Online -


:G-play

:Story

:F-Design

:Cutout

:Get Sig

:Raiden

:Fans [1] [2]

:#LegendaryArts

10/13/2008 02:16 AM (UTC)
0
Defensive Ice shaker instead of offensive. You'd have to be on your game to do it in the event that Superman tried to freeze you. Like Nightwolf's projectile deflector.
--
Or he could have a reversal of the ice breathe of Superman. He'd just throw it back. Similar in principal to Nightwolf's projectile deflector.
--
Or it could translate as a fake freeze, or a clone that is provoked by Supermans ice breathe. In this game, Sub-Zero already has a deceptive clone move....have that trigger when he gets frozen.

--
Or, he could just not be affected at all.
Avatar
ArmyofErmac
10/13/2008 08:52 AM (UTC)
0
Shinomune Wrote:
Or female characters to Johnny Cage's nutpunch grin


Hahah. i was going to say the samething. but yeah i think Sub-zero should be immune or maybe just take damage from the ice and not get frozen.
Pages: 2
Discord
Twitch
Twitter
YouTube
Facebook
Privacy Policy
© 1998-2025 Shadow Knight Media, LLC. All rights reserved. Mortal Kombat, the dragon logo and all character names are trademarks and copyright of Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.